Compared to Estimates, Match Group (MTCH) Q4 Earnings: A Look at Key Metrics
Match Group (MTCH) reported $878.01 million in revenue for the quarter ended December 2025, representing a year-over-year increase of 2.1%. EPS of $1.06 for the same period compares to $0.82 a year ago.
The reported revenue represents a surprise of +0.74% over the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $871.59 million. With the consensus EPS estimate being $1.01, the EPS surprise was +5.37%.
While investors scrutinize revenue and earnings changes year-over-year and how they compare with Wall Street expectations to determine their next move, some key metrics always offer a more accurate picture of a company's financial health.
As these metrics influence top- and bottom-line performance, comparing them to the year-ago numbers and what analysts estimated helps investors project a stock's price performance more accurately.
Here is how Match Group performed in the just reported quarter in terms of the metrics most widely monitored and projected by Wall Street analysts: Payers - Tinder: 8.77 million versus 8.82 million estimated by five analysts on average. Revenue Per Payer (RPP) - Total: $20.72 versus $20.33 estimated by five analysts on average. Payers - Total: 13.84 million versus the five-analyst average estimate of 14.02 million. Revenue Per Payer (RPP) - Tinder: $17.63 versus $17.25 estimated by four analysts on average. Revenue Per Payer (RPP) - Hinge: $32.96 versus $33.26 estimated by four analysts on average. Revenue Per Payer (RPP) - MG Asia: $20.91 compared to the $19.28 average estimate based on four analysts. Revenue- Direct Revenue- Tinder: $464 million versus $457.11 million estimated by five analysts on average. Compared to the year-ago quarter, this number represents a -2.5% change. Revenue- Indirect Revenue: $18 million versus $16.2 million estimated by four analysts on average. Compared to the year-ago quarter, this number represents a +20% change. Revenue- Direct Revenue- Evergreen and Emerging: $145 million versus the four-analyst average estimate of $143.06 million. The reported number represents a year-over-year change of -6.5%. Revenue- Direct Revenue- Hinge: $186 million compared to the $192.2 million average estimate based on four analysts. The reported number represents a change of +25.7% year over year. Revenue- Direct Revenue- MG Asia: $66 million versus $62.74 million estimated by four analysts on average. Compared to the year-ago quarter, this number represents a -1.5% change. Revenue- Total Direct Revenue: $860 million compared to the $854.26 million average estimate based on four analysts. The reported number represents a change of +1.8% year over year.View all Key Company Metrics for Match Group here>>>
Shares of Match Group have returned -2.8% over the past month versus the Zacks S&P 500 composite's +1.8% change. The stock currently has a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold), indicating that it could perform in line with the broader market in the near term.Radical New Technology Could Hand Investors Huge Gains
Quantum Computing is the next technological revolution, and it could be even more advanced than AI.
While some believed the technology was years away, it is already present and moving fast. Large hyperscalers, such as Microsoft, Google, Amazon, Oracle, and even Meta and Tesla, are scrambling to integrate quantum computing into their infrastructure.
Senior Stock Strategist Kevin Cook reveals 7 carefully selected stocks poised to dominate the quantum computing landscape in his report, Beyond AI: The Quantum Leap in Computing Power .
Kevin was among the early experts who recognized NVIDIA's enormous potential back in 2016. Now, he has keyed in on what could be "the next big thing" in quantum computing supremacy. Today, you have a rare chance to position your portfolio at the forefront of this opportunity.
See Top Quantum Stocks Now >>Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report
Match Group Inc. (MTCH): Free Stock Analysis Report
This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research (zacks.com).
