Cocrystal Pharma, Inc. quarterly report, Q1 FY2013

Business context and reporting period

The supplied filing is BioZone Pharmaceuticals, Inc.’s unaudited Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2013—not a filing in the name of Cocrystal Pharma, Inc. The company’s operations included contract manufacturing and marketing of OTC drugs, cosmetics and supplements, as well as development of proprietary drug-delivery technology. The filing states that results are seasonal, with about two-thirds of annual revenue generated in the second half of the year.

Key financial results

MetricQ1 2013Q1 2012
Sales$2.03 million$3.51 million
Gross profit / margin$592,083 / 29%$1.45 million / 41%
Operating expenses$1.61 million$2.04 million
Operating loss$1.02 million$591,383
Net loss$1.48 million$3.65 million
Basic and diluted loss per share$0.02$0.06
Operating cash flow$95,377 provided$1.94 million used

At March 31, 2013, cash was $92,123; current assets were $2.52 million and current liabilities were $9.21 million, producing a reported working-capital deficit of $6.69 million. Total assets were $7.11 million and shareholders’ deficiency was $5.06 million. Debt and debt-like balances included $1.82 million of convertible notes net of discount, $1.10 million due to a shareholder, and $3.16 million of long-term debt including its current portion. Accrued interest was $364,183 and derivative liabilities were $900,292.

Changes versus the prior comparable period

  • Sales fell 42.2%, primarily due to lower customer orders and end-user demand. Gross profit declined 59.0%; management attributed the margin contraction to fixed costs weighing more heavily on lower sales and higher raw-material costs that could not be passed to customers.
  • Operating expenses decreased $424,534, including lower professional fees and lower R&D costs after closure of the Princeton research facility.
  • Net loss narrowed by $2.17 million, but the comparison was substantially affected by noncash financing-related interest expense: Q1 2012 included warrant/derivative-related expense that was not repeated at the same level in Q1 2013. The operating loss itself worsened.
  • Operating cash flow improved, but included a $730,813 increase in accounts payable; cash remained very limited. Cash increased by $29,827 during the quarter.

Outlook, risks and unusual items

  • Going concern: Management reported recurring operating losses, negative working capital, accumulated deficit of $15.60 million, debt in default, and substantial doubt about the company’s ability to continue as a going concern. It said existing cash would not meet working-capital and capital-expenditure needs for the next 12 months and external financing may be required; availability and terms were uncertain.
  • Financing: A March 2013 factoring agreement provided for up to $1.5 million of discretionary receivables financing, with significant fees and potential chargebacks. The company and an affiliate guaranteed obligations and pledged assets; certain noteholders subordinated security interests. The filing does not establish how much funding was actually drawn.
  • Subsequent equity raise: In April 2013, the company sold 3.8 million shares and issued 1.9 million warrants for $950,000 gross proceeds, before fees. It also issued 2,518,356 shares to prior investors as an inducement/for dilution, plus placement-agent warrants. The filing reports 69,461,325 common shares outstanding as of May 10, 2013.
  • Legal matters: A former executive’s action seeking $23 million was settled on April 19, 2013; the company agreed to honor specified employment and stock-purchase agreement consideration, but full settlement terms were not yet disclosed. A related company lawsuit was dismissed. A separate customer lawsuit remained pending, with no estimate of reasonably possible losses provided.
  • Controls: Management concluded disclosure controls were ineffective, citing a material weakness related to inadequate segregation of duties and limited accounting staff.
  • No formal revenue or earnings guidance is provided. Management described plans to grow contract manufacturing and proprietary-brand sales, reduce costs and review sales efforts, but warned that financing may not be available on acceptable terms.

Important facts for investors to verify

  1. Confirm the issuer and filing identity: the supplied document names BioZone Pharmaceuticals, Inc., while the request metadata names Cocrystal Pharma, Inc.
  2. Check the status, amount drawn, effective cost and collateral consequences of the Midland factoring and purchase-money facilities, and the reported debt default.
  3. Review subsequent filings for the complete Fisher settlement terms, related share or other consideration, and the outcome of the remaining litigation.
  4. Assess whether the April financing and later funding were sufficient to address liquidity needs, and track share-count and warrant dilution.
  5. Monitor customer demand, gross margins, customer concentration and remediation of the disclosed internal-control weakness.