FOX FACTORY HOLDING CORP quarterly report, Q3 FY2017

Fox Factory Holding Corp. — Form 10-Q Summary

Period clarification: The request metadata says 2016 Q3, but the filing is for the quarter ended September 29, 2017, with comparisons to the quarter ended September 30, 2016. The interim financial statements are unaudited; each quarter comprised 13 weeks.

Business context

Fox designs and manufactures performance ride-dynamics products for bicycles and powered vehicles, selling to OEMs and through aftermarket retailers and distributors. It reports one operating and reportable segment.

Financial results

MetricQ3 2017Q3 2016First nine months 2017First nine months 2016
Sales$127.4 million$109.0 million$354.5 million$291.5 million
Gross profit / margin$42.6 million / 33.4%$34.9 million / 32.0%$115.4 million / 32.5%$92.3 million / 31.7%
Operating income / margin$20.4 million / 16.0%$15.1 million / 13.8%$51.0 million / 14.4%$32.1 million / 11.0%
Net income$16.1 million$13.7 million$40.3 million$25.9 million
Diluted EPS$0.41$0.36$1.04$0.69
  • Q3 sales rose 16.9%; powered-vehicle products increased 27.3% and bike products 8.8%. Management attributed powered-vehicle growth to higher on- and off-road suspension demand, including OEM sales; bike growth reflected product-line performance and favorable OEM specifications.
  • For the first nine months, sales grew 21.6%, led by powered-vehicle products, up 39.9%; bike products rose 8.5%. Operating income increased 58.9% and net income 55.6% year over year.
  • Management cited favorable product/customer mix and manufacturing efficiencies for Q3 gross-margin expansion; nine-month margin improvement was attributed primarily to manufacturing efficiencies. Operating expenses were 17.4% of Q3 sales versus 18.2% a year earlier, and 18.1% for nine months versus 20.7%.
  • Q3 effective tax rate was 19.5%, compared with 9.0%; the nine-month rates were 17.7% and 14.3%. 2017 benefited from lower foreign tax rates and excess stock-compensation deductions; higher income and non-creditable foreign withholding taxes contributed to the year-over-year rate increase.

Cash flow, debt and liquidity

  • For the first nine months, operating cash flow was $22.0 million, versus $11.2 million in 2016; investing cash outflow was $10.2 million, primarily capital spending of $10.1 million. Approximate operating cash flow less property/equipment purchases was $11.9 million.
  • Cash increased $1.5 million to $36.8 million. Working capital absorbed cash, notably a $19.8 million inventory increase; management said inventory was built to shorten order-fulfillment times. Receivables increased $6.5 million, partly offset by higher payables.
  • Debt was $64.0 million, including $4.6 million current and $59.4 million long-term, net of issuance costs. Cash less reported debt was approximately $27.2 million. The $100 million revolving facility had no borrowings and was fully available. The term facility matures May 11, 2021; weighted-average borrowing rate was 2.83%. The company reported compliance with financial covenants.
  • Financing cash outflow was $11.0 million, including $5.4 million of contingent-consideration payments and $2.8 million of term-debt repayments. Cash and cash equivalents included $11.8 million held outside the U.S. under an indefinite-reinvestment assertion.

Outlook, risks and unusual items

  • The filing provides no numerical full-year guidance. Management stated it believed U.S. cash and future domestic operating cash flows were sufficient for U.S. operating needs and debt repayments for the foreseeable future. It also noted that results are seasonal and quarterly performance may not indicate full-year results.
  • Management identified growth in performance products, new-product development, aftermarket and international expansion, manufacturing and supply-chain efficiency, and selective acquisitions as business priorities. Risks include discretionary consumer demand, competition, OEM/customer concentration, product mix, foreign exchange, supplier and manufacturing disruptions, and execution of the Taiwan manufacturing transition.
  • SRAM patent and Lanham Act litigation remained unresolved. The company was defending lawsuits and pursuing its own patent claims; its U.S. lawsuits were stayed pending patent-review proceedings. No loss estimate or accrual was recorded, and management said an unfavorable outcome could materially harm results or financial condition.
  • The filing cites recalls, including a voluntary recall of certain Float X2 shocks and a recall of approximately 2,460 Harley-Davidson-specific aftermarket motorcycle shocks. Warranty expense was $4.0 million for the first nine months, and the warranty liability was $5.1 million at quarter-end.
  • General and administrative expense included $3.2 million of patent-litigation costs for the first nine months, compared with $1.9 million in the prior-year period. Acquisition-related compensation arrangements concluded during Q1 2017; no such expense was recorded in Q3, compared with $0.8 million in Q3 2016.
  • The company was preparing for the new revenue-recognition standard, effective for it in fiscal 2018, and had not selected a transition method. Management was assessing potential effects on revenue timing, pricing provisions, and customer reimbursements; the impact was not yet determined.

Most important facts to verify

  • Confirm the intended reporting period: this filing covers Q3 2017, not Q3 2016.
  • Assess whether powered-vehicle growth, OEM demand and favorable bike specifications are sustainable, and how customer and product mix may affect margins.
  • Review inventory growth and cash conversion, including whether the inventory build supports fulfillment without creating excess-stock risk.
  • Track the SRAM litigation and the product recalls, warranty claims and any resulting costs or customer effects.
  • Evaluate the sustainability of the low effective tax rate, including stock-based compensation benefits, foreign earnings and potential tax-audit outcomes.