FOX FACTORY HOLDING CORP annual report, FY2013

Fox Factory Holding Corp. — FY 2013 Form 10-K

Reporting-period note: The filing is the annual report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, not a 2012 Q4 filing. It includes unaudited quarterly results, including fourth-quarter 2013 and 2012.

Business context

Fox designs, manufactures and markets premium suspension products for mountain bikes and powered vehicles. It operates as one reportable segment. In 2013, 66% of sales were from mountain-bike products and 34% from powered-vehicle products; 81% of sales were to OEMs and 19% through aftermarket dealers and distributors. International shipments represented 65% of sales. Fox completed its IPO in August 2013.

Financial performance and liquidity

MetricFY 2013FY 2012Change
Sales$272.7 million$235.9 million+15.6%
Gross profit / margin$80.1 million / 29.4%$62.8 million / 26.6%Margin +2.8 percentage points
Operating income / margin$38.8 million / 14.2%$26.2 million / 11.1%Operating income +48.3%
Net income$24.1 million$14.2 million+69.6%
Diluted EPS$0.68$0.44—
Operating cash flow$22.6 million$17.4 million—
Capital expenditures$3.9 million$4.9 million—

Cash and cash equivalents were $1.7 million at year-end, inventory was $42.8 million, working capital was $39.9 million, and total assets were $157.7 million. Debt was $8.0 million, down from $59.3 million at year-end 2012; $52.0 million remained available under the $60 million revolving facility. Stockholders’ equity rose to $92.3 million from $29.6 million, reflecting the IPO and earnings. Operating cash flow was partly absorbed by higher receivables and inventory, which increased by $8.5 million and $7.4 million, respectively.

Fourth-quarter 2013 sales were $65.3 million and net income was $4.9 million, compared with $56.6 million and $1.8 million, respectively, in Q4 2012.

Material changes versus prior periods

  • Sales grew 15.6%, driven mainly by OEM sales, which increased $30.0 million to $219.9 million as Fox gained product specification positions; aftermarket sales also increased.
  • Gross margin improved from 26.6% to 29.4%. Management attributed 1.6 percentage points of improvement to operating-efficiency initiatives and 1.2 points to the nonrecurrence of elevated 2012 warranty and related costs.
  • 2012 margin had been pressured by $2.8 million in damper-related warranty and upgrade costs, $1.7 million in expedited inbound freight, and additional facility and Taiwan expansion costs.
  • Interest expense rose to $4.1 million from $3.5 million, including a $1.4 million noncash write-off of unamortized fees when the related-party credit facility was terminated.
  • 2013 included $2.5 million of net IPO proceeds reported in the cash-flow statement as stock-based compensation? No: IPO net proceeds were approximately $36.1 million to the company, while total stock-based compensation was $2.5 million. The IPO proceeds and refinancing helped reduce related-party debt; the 2013 credit facility replaced the prior facility.

Outlook, risks and unusual items

  • Management expected cash on hand, operating cash flow and available credit to fund operations for at least 18 months from the report date. Estimated 2014 capital expenditures were $5.8 million to $6.8 million.
  • Fox expected its 2014 effective tax rate to be slightly above 2013’s 30.5%; the medium-term estimate was approximately 34%–36%. Management anticipated a roughly $1.6 million tax benefit in 2014 from an expected statute-of-limitations expiration, subject to tax outcomes.
  • The company was moving most mountain-bike manufacturing to Taiwan, with completion planned for 2015. Management expected longer-term efficiency, lead-time and cost benefits, but cautioned that transition costs, disruption, quality, delivery and brand-perception risks could arise.
  • A voluntary 2013 recall covered certain model-year 2013 Evolution Series forks with specified open-cartridge dampers. The filing says the final recall costs could exceed the reserve; the reserve’s sufficiency was uncertain.
  • Customer concentration is significant: the ten largest OEM customers represented 57% of sales, and sales to Giant were 17%. Supplier concentration also warrants attention: ten vendors supplied 48% of product components in 2013, and Miyaki was the sole source for the specific Kashima coating.
  • Other key risks include discretionary consumer demand, seasonality (Q1 typically lowest, Q3 highest), competition, product warranties and liability, foreign exchange exposure, variable-rate debt and credit-facility covenants. The company reported compliance with its credit covenants at year-end.
  • Fox reported no material accrued legal loss contingencies and no material off-balance-sheet arrangements. It paid no dividend in 2013 and did not expect to pay dividends in the foreseeable future.
  • After year-end, Fox agreed to acquire Sport Truck USA for approximately $44 million at closing, financed with debt, plus a potential earn-out of up to $29.3 million. Closing was expected by the end of March 2014, subject to approvals and customary conditions.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Confirm the intended period: this filing reports FY 2013, although the request metadata specifies 2012 Q4.
  • Review whether rising receivables and inventory convert into cash and whether the improved gross margin is sustainable after 2012’s unusual warranty costs faded.
  • Track the Taiwan manufacturing transition, including execution costs, product quality, delivery performance and realized savings.
  • Assess the financial impact and completion terms of the Sport Truck acquisition, including debt funding and earn-out conditions.
  • Monitor recall and warranty claims, key OEM and supplier concentration, and compliance with the revolving credit facility’s covenants.