Home Federal Bancorp, Inc. Of Louisiana quarterly report, Q1 FY2018

Business context and reporting period

Home Federal Bancorp, Inc. of Louisiana is the holding company for Home Federal Bank, a community savings and loan institution serving northwest Louisiana, principally the Shreveport-Bossier City area. The filing covers the three months ended September 30, 2017—the company’s fiscal 2018 first quarter, although the request labels it 2017 Q1. Financial statement amounts below are in millions of dollars unless noted.

Financial performance and condition

  • Profitability: Net income was $1.008 million, up 0.6% from $1.002 million a year earlier. Basic and diluted EPS were $0.55 and $0.53, respectively, unchanged year over year. Dividends declared increased to $0.12 per share from $0.09.
  • Revenue and interest results: Net interest income rose 8.2% to $3.742 million. Total interest income increased 12.2% to $4.593 million, while interest expense rose 33.4% to $0.851 million. Non-interest income fell 13.4% to $0.968 million; the $0.605 million gain on loan sales was lower than the prior-year $0.798 million, partly offset by a $0.094 million securities-sale gain and higher deposit service charges.
  • Margins: Management reports a 3.48% interest-rate spread and 3.69% net interest margin for the quarter. The filing gives conflicting prior-year comparisons: narrative disclosures cite 3.60% spread and 3.78% margin, while the average-balance table shows 3.68% and 3.83%, respectively. Verify the comparable-period figures.
  • Expenses and taxes: Non-interest expense increased 2.0% to $2.831 million, including higher legal and other expenses. Income tax expense was $0.571 million, with a 36.2% effective tax rate, versus $0.498 million and 33.2% a year earlier.
  • Assets and lending: Total assets declined 2.0% from June 30, 2017 to $418.0 million. Net loans increased 2.7% to $321.2 million, while loans held for sale fell 41.4% to $8.0 million and total securities declined to $58.4 million. Residential, multifamily, construction, and commercial real estate lending contributed to loan growth.
  • Credit quality: The loan-loss provision was $0.300 million, unchanged year over year. The allowance declined to $3.231 million from $3.729 million after $0.802 million in charge-offs, compared with $0.014 million in the prior-year quarter. Loans graded substandard totaled $7.358 million, up from $3.311 million at June 30. The company reported $3.3 million of non-performing assets at quarter-end, versus $3.6 million at June 30.
  • Cash flow: Operating cash flow was $7.715 million, investing cash flow was negative $1.734 million, and financing cash flow was negative $10.339 million. Cash and cash equivalents decreased $4.358 million to $7.547 million; management attributed the decline in part to funding loan growth.
  • Funding and capital: Deposits increased 1.4% to $333.5 million. FHLB advances declined $14.1 million to $34.8 million. Stockholders’ equity was $46.4 million. The Bank reported regulatory capital ratios of 10.86% tangible, 15.99% common equity Tier 1, 10.86% core, and 17.11% risk-based, and stated that it exceeded minimum requirements.

Material changes versus the prior comparable period

  • Net income was nearly flat: higher net interest income was largely offset by lower non-interest income, higher expenses, and higher income taxes.
  • Interest costs grew faster than interest income, and the reported spread and net interest margin were lower than in the prior year, subject to the filing’s inconsistent comparisons noted above.
  • Loan growth supported higher interest income, while loan-sale volume and gains were lower. Securities sales and repayments also reduced the investment portfolio.
  • Credit indicators warrant attention: charge-offs increased materially, substandard loans rose from June 30, and non-performing loans included a commercial borrower in bankruptcy proceedings.

Outlook, risks, contingencies, and unusual items

  • No quantified earnings or financial guidance is provided. Management said it intends to use liquidity to support lending and may sell available-for-sale securities if additional funds are needed.
  • At September 30, the Bank had $149.5 million of additional FHLB borrowing capacity and a $15.5 million federal-funds purchase facility with no outstanding balance. It also had $41.9 million in loan-origination commitments and $10.1 million in unused-line commitments. Certificates of deposit totaling $67.4 million were due within one year; management noted renewal costs could rise in a higher-rate environment.
  • Management considers the allowance adequate but cautions that loan-loss estimates are judgmental and future losses could exceed the allowance. The filing describes a $1.7 million non-accrual commercial exposure to a borrower in Chapter 11 and a new $4.7 million commercial TDR that was current on interest payments, with no losses expected at that time. No additional lending commitments to TDR borrowers were reported.
  • Other real estate owned increased by $0.143 million following foreclosure on a one-to-four-family mortgage loan. Securities unrealized losses were attributed to interest-rate changes; management said it had the ability and intent to hold the affected securities until recovery and did not consider them other-than-temporarily impaired.
  • The company repurchased 26,013 shares during August at an average $27.25 per share. Routine legal proceedings were described as immaterial; the filing says there were no material changes in internal control and that disclosure controls were effective.

Important facts for investors to verify

  1. Reconcile the prior-year interest-rate spread and net interest margin: the narrative and average-balance table report different values.
  2. Reconcile the filing’s varying descriptions of non-performing loans and non-performing assets, including whether the reported $3.3 million refers to loans alone or loans plus $0.683 million of other real estate owned.
  3. Review the $0.802 million of quarterly charge-offs, the rise in substandard loans, and the reserve implications for the commercial borrower and TDRs.
  4. Assess deposit-renewal pricing, loan commitments, available liquidity, and reliance on FHLB capacity as lending grows.
  5. Confirm the sustainability of earnings given higher funding costs, lower loan-sale gains, and the quarter’s securities-sale gain.