Recon Technology, Ltd quarterly report, Q2 FY2013

Recon Technology, Ltd. — Form 10-Q Summary

Business context and reporting period. Recon provides oilfield equipment, automation and software, and production-enhancement services in China through consolidated variable-interest entities (VIEs). This unaudited report covers the three and six months ended December 31, 2012—fiscal Q2 and first half of FY2013—with comparisons to the same periods of 2011. Amounts below are in RMB unless otherwise noted.

Key financial metrics

MetricThree months ended Dec. 31, 2012Six months ended Dec. 31, 2012
Revenue45.98 million, up 49.1%55.03 million, up 53.8%
Gross profit / margin14.02 million / 30.5% (29.6% prior year)16.47 million / 29.9% (32.4% prior year)
Operating income (loss)5.68 million (2.09 million prior year)3.34 million (1.14 million loss prior year)
Net income (loss)5.89 million (1.58 million prior year)3.55 million (1.82 million loss prior year)
Net income (loss) attributable to ordinary shareholders5.29 million2.94 million
Operating cash flowNot separately presented for the quarter5.21 million, versus 2.02 million used in prior-year period
Cash and cash equivalents at period end2.07 million
Working capital at period end81.86 million
Current liabilities at period end64.61 million

At December 31, current assets were 146.47 million and total assets were 155.33 million. Short-term obligations included 16.00 million of bank loans, 1.90 million of other short-term borrowings, and 5.69 million borrowed from related parties. Total equity was 90.72 million. Adjusted EBITDA for the six-month period was 6.10 million, compared with a loss of 0.64 million a year earlier; this is a non-GAAP measure defined by the company.

Material changes versus the prior comparable periods

  • Service revenue rose to 20.50 million from 3.56 million in both the quarter and six-month comparison, primarily reflecting fracturing work under contracts with Sinopec Zhongyuan Oilfield totaling 30 million. The company said most of the contracted work was completed and corresponding revenue recognized by December 31.
  • For the quarter, hardware revenue declined year over year, mainly due to lower furnace sales; for the six months, non-related-party hardware revenue increased 14.9%. Related-party hardware revenue declined in both comparisons, partly because one customer was no longer classified as related.
  • Quarterly gross margin increased to 30.5%, supported by a greater contribution from higher-margin service and software sales. First-half gross margin fell to 29.9%, which management attributed mainly to a larger share of lower-margin furnace sales, higher material and labor costs, and follow-on project costs.
  • First-half operating results turned positive as revenue grew and general and administrative expenses fell. R&D expense increased 23.1% for the half and 72.5% for the quarter, primarily for furnaces and fracturing services.
  • Receivables remained a significant balance: net third-party accounts receivable was 82.97 million and net related-party receivables were 16.25 million. Management said 58% of receivables outstanding at June 30, 2012 had been collected by December 31.

Outlook, commentary, and risks

  • Management provided no quantified earnings or revenue guidance. It expressed expectations for additional fracturing contracts, furnace and burner demand, oilfield automation work, and revenue from a newer down-hole tools line in FY2013. Overseas opportunities in Turkmenistan were being pursued, but bidding for the anticipated next project phase had not commenced.
  • Management believed working capital would cover operating liquidity needs for the next 12 months, relying in part on collection of receivables. Cash declined 1.46 million during the half: operating cash flow of 5.21 million was more than offset by 6.56 million of financing outflows and 0.40 million of investing outflows. The company repaid 12.00 million of bank loans and obtained a 5.00 million bank loan guaranteed by a shareholder.
  • Customer concentration was material. CNPC and Sinopec together represented approximately 71.4% of quarterly revenue and 79.3% of first-half revenue in 2012. One supplier accounted for 23% of purchases in the quarter and 27% for the half.
  • The company is a holding company whose operations are conducted through PRC VIEs. Its ability to receive distributions depends on VIE profits and PRC statutory reserve and dividend restrictions. VIE assets are not available to satisfy claims against the parent’s general assets.
  • Disclosure controls and procedures were concluded to be ineffective at timely alerting management to information required in SEC filings. Management described control-documentation and review remediation, but reported no material control changes in the quarter beyond those disclosed.
  • An estimated 1.2 million of potential employee severance payments was not recorded in the financial statements. The company reported no legal proceedings and no material guarantees or other off-balance-sheet arrangements; it also reported no long-lived asset impairments.
  • Other relevant exposures include short-term loan maturities in 2013, related-party borrowings and payables, and uninsured PRC bank balances. A high-technology tax certification for BHD was awaiting final approval for extension; loss of the preferential tax treatment could affect taxes.

Most important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether the large receivables balance—especially third-party and related-party amounts—is being collected on schedule and whether the allowance for doubtful accounts remains adequate.
  • Whether fracturing revenue and margins are repeatable after completion of the major Sinopec Zhongyuan contracts, and whether the expected new work has been contracted.
  • Customer and supplier concentration, including the sustainability of CNPC and Sinopec activity and the company’s reliance on its largest supplier.
  • Near-term debt maturities, refinancing capacity, related-party funding terms, and the effects of shareholder guarantees.
  • Progress in remediating ineffective disclosure controls, and the status and potential financial treatment of the unrecorded severance estimate.
  • VIE contractual arrangements and restrictions on moving cash from PRC operating entities to the Cayman Islands parent. The filing also includes an exhibit description referring to a February 2012 press release titled “Second Quarter 2013 Financial Results”; verify the exhibit date and title against the filing record.