SHORE BANCSHARES INC quarterly report, Q3 FY2013

Shore Bancshares, Inc. — Form 10-Q Summary

Reporting period: Quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2013. Shore Bancshares is a Maryland-based financial holding company operating community banks and insurance businesses on the Eastern Shore of Maryland and Delaware. Figures below are in U.S. dollars; financial statement amounts are generally in millions unless noted.

Financial results and position

MetricQ3 2013Q3 2012Nine months 2013Nine months 2012
Net interest income$8.8$8.7$26.3$27.0
Provision for credit losses$22.5$6.2$27.3$18.1
Noninterest income$4.8$4.0$13.2$13.2
Noninterest expense$10.0$9.7$30.2$29.9
Net loss$11.4$1.8$10.8$4.6
Diluted loss per share$1.35$0.22$1.28$0.54
  • Margins: Tax-equivalent net interest margin was 3.54% in Q3 2013 versus 3.15% a year earlier; nine-month margin was 3.48% versus 3.31%. The nine-month tax-equivalent net interest income was $26.4 million, down 2.6% year over year.
  • Balance sheet at September 30: Total assets were $1.051 billion, down from $1.186 billion at December 31, 2012. Loans were $718.6 million, down 8.5%; deposits were $930.4 million, down 11.3%. Stockholders’ equity was $102.0 million, versus $114.0 million at year-end.
  • Credit quality: Allowance for credit losses was $11.3 million, compared with $16.0 million at year-end. Nine-month net charge-offs were $32.0 million versus $19.4 million in 2012. Reported nonperforming assets, excluding nonaccrual loans held for sale, declined to $23.3 million from $44.6 million; including those held-for-sale loans, they were $30.6 million.
  • Cash flow, first nine months: Operating activities provided $10.4 million and investing activities provided $17.5 million; financing activities used $121.1 million. Cash and cash equivalents decreased $93.3 million to $106.9 million.
  • Debt and liquidity: Short-term borrowings were $11.5 million, all repurchase agreements; the filing reports no long-term debt at September 30. Banks had $15.5 million of correspondent-bank credit lines and approximately $53.7 million of FHLB credit availability. The company suspended cash dividends in 2012 and paid none in the first nine months of 2013.

Material changes and unusual items

  • The principal driver of the Q3 loss was a planned sale of problem assets. On October 28, 2013, the Bank agreed to sell assets with a reported book value of $45.0 million for $25.2 million. The portfolio included loans and other real estate owned. The company recorded $19.6 million of loan charge-offs and an additional $19.6 million provision to replenish the allowance, plus a $182,000 write-down of other real estate owned.
  • The 10-Q revised the accounting and presentation of the asset-sale losses from the October 28 press release: the losses were reflected through loan charge-offs, provision and other-real-estate write-downs rather than as a single noninterest-income loss. The change did not affect reported net loss. Loans held for sale totaled $23.6 million at quarter-end; the filing says $10.7 million were sold on November 8 and the remaining assets were then scheduled for sale in mid-December, subject to closing conditions.
  • Management said the asset sale was intended to reduce problem assets and portfolio risk and allow greater focus on healthy new lending. It described regional real-estate values as beginning to stabilize, but noted that soft local economic conditions and limited high-quality loan opportunities continued to weigh on performance.
  • Net interest margin improved as funding costs fell, including after the company exited the Insured Network Deposits Program and terminated associated interest-rate caps. Terminating the caps also resulted in a $1.3 million second-quarter loss on the ineffective portion of the hedge.

Capital, risks and outlook

  • Regulatory order: Talbot Bank is subject to a consent order effective May 24, 2013. The order requires minimum leverage and total risk-based capital ratios of 8% and 12%, respectively. At September 30, Talbot Bank reported 6.59% and 9.70%, was below both requirements, and had notified regulators. It was developing a plan to restore capital, including possible operating earnings, parent-company capital support and other capital-raising alternatives. The order restricts dividends or fees to the parent without prior regulatory consent.
  • Distinguish bank from parent ratios: The filing reports consolidated company ratios of 8.25% leverage, 12.44% total risk-based capital and 11.21% Tier 1 risk-based capital. These were above the stated general regulatory minimums, but do not remove Talbot Bank’s separate consent-order shortfall.
  • Credit risk is material: construction and commercial real estate represented 51.8% of loans at September 30. Management cautioned that local real-estate and construction conditions affect loan performance and collateral values, and that actual credit losses may differ from allowance estimates.
  • No earnings or revenue guidance is provided. Management expects to continue working through remaining problem loans and to charge off nonperforming assets as rapidly as possible. Forward-looking results remain subject to economic, interest-rate, competitive and regulatory risks.
  • The company stated that disclosure controls were effective at a reasonable assurance level and that there was no material change in internal control over financial reporting during the quarter. It reported no legal proceedings it believed would materially adversely affect financial condition or earnings.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether the remaining asset-sale transactions closed on the expected terms and how the sale affected subsequent credit metrics and earnings.
  • Talbot Bank’s progress toward the consent-order capital requirements, the timing and source of any capital support, and any regulatory response.
  • Whether lower nonperforming-asset balances persist after separating assets transferred to or held for sale from the remaining portfolio.
  • Future charge-offs, allowance adequacy and trends in delinquent, nonaccrual and restructured loans, particularly construction and commercial real estate.
  • Deposit trends, available liquidity and the effects of reduced deposits and loan balances on net interest income and margins.