Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc. quarterly report, Q1 FY2014

Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc. — Q1 2014 Form 10-Q

Business context and reporting period. The unaudited consolidated filing covers the three months ended March 31, 2014, compared with Q1 2013 for operating results and December 31, 2013 for balance-sheet changes. The company operates through commercial banking and investment management and trust services. The 2014 results include the Oldham County acquisition, completed April 30, 2013, so year-over-year comparisons include acquired operations only in the current period. Shareholders approved changing the holding company’s name from S.Y. Bancorp, Inc. to Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc. on April 23, 2014.

Financial performance and condition

  • Revenue and earnings: Net interest income was $20.2 million, up 9.6% year over year; non-interest income was $9.5 million, up 2.7%. Net income rose 20.8% to $8.18 million, and diluted EPS increased to $0.56 from $0.49. The effective tax rate was 30.8% in both periods.
  • Margins and returns: Net interest margin was 3.76%, down from 3.83%; management reported core margin of 3.72%, including adjustments for fair-value accretion and other items. Annualized return on average assets was 1.41% versus 1.30%; return on average equity was 14.14% versus 13.18%. The efficiency ratio was 56.00% versus 55.76%.
  • Credit: Provision for loan losses declined to $350,000 from $2.325 million; net charge-offs were $281,000 versus $2.184 million. Allowance coverage was 1.65% of period-end loans versus 2.00% a year earlier. Nonperforming loans were $20.46 million, or 1.18% of loans, versus $22.94 million, or 1.33%, at year-end 2013. One borrower relationship represented $6.7 million, or 53%, of non-accrual loans; management estimated minimal loss exposure after considering collateral.
  • Cash flow: Operating activities provided $7.2 million, compared with $22.2 million in Q1 2013. Investing activities provided $48.3 million, primarily reflecting net maturities of securities; financing activities used $43.3 million, mainly from lower short-term borrowings. Cash and cash equivalents ended the quarter at $83.0 million, up from $70.8 million at year-end.
  • Balance sheet and liquidity: Total assets were $2.354 billion, down 1.5% from year-end, chiefly as securities declined $49.8 million; loans increased $7.3 million to $1.729 billion. Deposits totaled $1.987 billion, up $6.5 million. Cash, federal funds sold and available-for-sale securities totaled substantial liquid resources; $238.7 million of securities were unpledged. Core deposits were $1.644 billion, or 83% of deposits. Available FHLB credit was $370.4 million, with $85 million of correspondent-bank federal funds lines.
  • Debt and capital: FHLB advances were $34.3 million; repurchase-agreement borrowings and federal funds purchased totaled $71.2 million, down from $117.9 million at year-end. The company redeemed $30 million of 10% subordinated debentures in Q4 2013, contributing to lower interest expense. Stockholders’ equity was $237.0 million. The bank’s total risk-based capital ratio was 13.24%, Tier 1 ratio 11.99%, and leverage ratio 9.61%; it met regulatory requirements and was well capitalized. Tangible common equity to tangible assets, a non-GAAP measure, was 9.96%.

Material changes and management commentary

  • Management attributed higher earnings primarily to the sharply lower loan-loss provision, higher net interest income and modestly higher non-interest income. Interest expense fell substantially after the subordinated-debt redemption and with lower deposit costs.
  • Trust and investment management revenue rose 17.6% to $4.57 million; assets under management were $2.28 billion versus $2.01 billion a year earlier. Mortgage banking revenue fell 50.2% to $588,000, reflecting an 88% decline in refinance volume and weaker purchase activity during severe winter weather.
  • Non-interest expense increased 12.6% to $17.54 million, including higher salaries and benefits, occupancy and data-processing costs. Staffing was 522 full-time equivalents versus 488 a year earlier. A $343,000 gain on sale of foreclosed assets benefited Q1 2014 results, compared with a $35,000 gain in Q1 2013.
  • Management said it expects margin compression to diminish during 2014 and intends to maintain historically high capital ratios while economic conditions improve and Basel III rules become definitive. The filing provides no earnings or revenue guidance.

Outlook, risks and contingencies

  • Interest-rate simulation indicated lower net interest income under modeled immediate rate changes: down 4.03% with a 100-basis-point increase, 5.72% with a 200-basis-point increase, and 2.11% with a 100-basis-point decrease over the modeled one-year period. Management cautioned that the model indicates trends, not actual expected results.
  • Management identified economic conditions, competition, regulation, interest rates, customer liquidity and credit conditions as risks. It considers the loan-loss allowance adequate but notes estimates depend on borrower conditions, historical losses and qualitative judgments and may be adjusted by regulators.
  • Credit commitments, including standby letters of credit, totaled $459.2 million; management anticipated no significant losses. Pending legal proceedings were not expected to have a material adverse effect. The IRS was examining the 2011 corporate return; management did not expect a material effect.
  • Other notable exposures include $7.3 million of troubled-debt restructurings and one $790,000 TDR loan that had defaulted within the prior 12 months. Unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities were $5.0 million; management attributed them mainly to interest-rate changes and did not consider the securities other-than-temporarily impaired.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether the lower credit-loss provision and improving nonperforming-loan metrics persist, particularly given the $6.7 million non-accrual borrower concentration.
  • Whether core net interest margin stabilizes as management expects, and how changing rates affect loan yields, deposit costs and securities values.
  • Whether growth in trust revenue offsets weaker mortgage-banking and brokerage activity, and whether elevated personnel and operating expenses continue.
  • How acquired Oldham operations affect year-over-year comparability, and whether reported earnings include material nonrecurring items such as the OREO gain.
  • Whether deposit balances, available borrowing capacity and capital remain adequate if seasonal or broader funding conditions change.