Vital Farms, Inc. quarterly report, Q2 FY2020

Vital Farms, Inc. — Q2 2020 Form 10-Q

Reporting period: 13 weeks ended June 28, 2020; comparative quarter ended June 30, 2019. Year-to-date figures cover 26 weeks. Amounts are in millions of dollars unless otherwise indicated.

Business context

Vital Farms packages and sells pasture-raised eggs, butter and related products, sourcing primarily through a network of about 200 small family farms. Eggs accounted for approximately 92% of revenue in both the quarter and first half. The filing reports strong retail-driven growth, while foodservice remained a small channel.

Financial performance

MetricQ2 2020Q2 2019First half 2020First half 2019
Revenue$59.3$32.3$106.9$65.2
Gross profit$22.7$11.0$38.6$22.5
Gross margin38%34%36%35%
Operating income$9.1$3.9$12.0$8.2
Net income$5.9$2.8$7.9$6.8
Net income attributable to Vital Farms common stockholders$6.0$2.8$7.9$5.9
Adjusted EBITDA$9.3$4.4$13.1$9.2

Quarterly revenue rose 84% year over year; first-half revenue rose 64%. Management attributed growth mainly to higher egg and butter sales volumes, including increased purchases of staples during COVID-19 stay-at-home conditions. Gross margin improved by 4 percentage points in Q2 and 1 point in the first half. The company said Q2 improvement reflected higher volume associated with pandemic trends and lower warehousing and transportation costs; first-half improvement also reflected operating leverage.

SG&A increased 110% to $10.0 million in Q2 and 98% to $19.6 million in the first half, driven by staffing, marketing, commissions and public-company-related costs. Shipping and distribution expense rose with sales volume, though as a share of revenue declined to 6% from 7% in both comparisons.

Cash, debt and liquidity

  • Cash and cash equivalents were $17.1 million at June 28, 2020, versus $1.3 million at December 29, 2019. Current assets were $46.2 million and current liabilities $25.4 million.
  • First-half operating cash flow was $17.7 million, compared with $2.0 million a year earlier. Capital expenditures were $5.4 million, versus $1.5 million; reported investing cash outflow was $5.4 million.
  • Debt carrying value was approximately $9.8 million, including $1.5 million current and $8.3 million long-term, net of issuance costs. The facility is secured by company assets; the company reported covenant compliance at quarter end. Net assets were restricted in use under facility terms.
  • The company received a $2.6 million PPP loan in April and repaid it in full that month without using the proceeds. It repaid the revolving-line balance in April; the equipment-loan balance was repaid in September 2020.
  • After quarter end, the August 2020 IPO generated approximately $99.5 million in net proceeds to the company. All outstanding preferred shares converted into common shares upon the IPO. Management said available cash, operating cash flow, IPO proceeds and credit-facility availability were expected to fund operations and planned investment for at least 12 months.

Changes, outlook and notable items

  • Revenue growth was partly offset by higher customer sales incentives. Q2 included a $0.6 million reduction in incentives settled during the quarter but related to prior-year sales.
  • First-half 2020 other expense of $0.4 million compared with other income of $1.2 million in the prior-year period, which included a one-time Ovabrite litigation-settlement gain. Q2 other expense included a $0.2 million write-off of software implementation costs.
  • Management gave no numerical revenue or earnings guidance. It expected adequate egg supply and processing capacity for anticipated fiscal 2020 demand, but said pandemic-related disruption could affect supply, operations and demand. Recent stay-at-home buying trends contributed to growth, and management cautioned that their duration was uncertain.
  • Milk-supply disruptions had caused supplier losses; management reported no then-current effect on ability to fill butter or ghee orders but expected the disruptions to continue. The company also cited packaging availability and quality issues, using recycled plastic packaging for a small number of egg products.
  • Key risks include reliance on a small number of distributors and product suppliers, concentration of shell-egg processing at Egg Central Station, commodity and feed-cost volatility, seasonality, food safety and quality, and continued dependence on premium consumer demand. One major hard-boiled-egg co-manufacturer had recalled product in December 2019 and temporarily constrained supply in early 2020.
  • The company reported disclosure controls were effective as of June 28, 2020. It said two previously identified internal-control material weaknesses had been remediated in 2019; management’s assessment of internal control was not required in this quarterly report.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether pandemic-driven purchasing and the associated gross-margin benefit persisted after Q2, and how much of revenue growth reflected durable demand versus temporary pantry loading.
  • Customer and distributor concentration: several distributors each represented significant portions of revenue, and the distributor serving Whole Foods changed during 2020.
  • Whether egg and milk supply, packaging availability, co-manufacturer capacity and Egg Central Station expansion can support continued growth without quality or fulfillment issues.
  • Debt and liquidity after the IPO, including the effect of facility covenants, repayment of equipment debt and planned capital investment.
  • Underlying profitability and cash generation after separating one-time items, stock-based compensation, public-company costs and the non-GAAP adjustments used in Adjusted EBITDA.