FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORP quarterly report, Q3 FY2012

First Commonwealth Financial Corporation — Q3 2012 Form 10-Q

Reporting period: Quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2012. Unaudited consolidated results; dollar amounts below are in millions unless stated otherwise.

Business context and key financial results

The company is a bank holding company. Results improved year over year, primarily as lower credit costs and higher noninterest income more than offset pressure on net interest income and increased expenses.

MetricQ3 2012Q3 2011Nine months 2012Nine months 2011
Net income$9.8$8.3$33.2$21.0
Diluted EPS$0.09$0.08$0.32$0.20
Net interest income, GAAP$46.7$47.5$141.7$142.2
Net interest income, fully taxable equivalent$47.7$48.8$145.1$146.5
Net interest margin, fully taxable equivalent3.54%3.81%3.63%3.81%
Provision for credit losses$6.8$7.0$14.8$29.9
Noninterest income$17.9$10.8$51.3$42.2
Noninterest expense$44.8$41.1$133.4$128.3

Financial position, cash flow and liquidity

  • At September 30, assets were $5.964 billion, up from $5.841 billion at December 31, 2011. Portfolio loans were $4.214 billion, up 4% from year-end; deposits were $4.494 billion, slightly below $4.505 billion.
  • Cash and cash equivalents were $89.1 million at quarter-end. For the first nine months, operating cash flow was $54.6 million; investing activities used $135.2 million, largely reflecting $185.0 million of net loan growth; financing activities provided $91.2 million.
  • Short-term borrowings rose to $461.8 million from $312.8 million at year-end. Long-term debt was $74.7 million and subordinated debentures were $105.8 million. Management cited available borrowing capacity through the Federal Reserve, FHLB and other sources.
  • Shareholders’ equity was $773.9 million. The company and its bank subsidiary met applicable regulatory capital requirements; the bank’s total risk-based, Tier I risk-based and Tier I leverage ratios were 14.3%, 13.1% and 11.2%, respectively.

Material changes and credit quality

  • Nine-month net income rose 58% year over year. The provision for credit losses fell by $15.1 million, while noninterest income increased $9.1 million. Net interest income on a fully taxable equivalent basis declined $1.4 million.
  • Management attributed margin pressure to the low-rate environment and runoff of higher-yielding assets. It reported that approximately $2.9 billion of interest-sensitive assets would reprice or mature over the next 12 months.
  • Net charge-offs were $12.0 million for the first nine months, compared with $29.0 million a year earlier. The allowance was $64.1 million, or 1.52% of loans, versus $61.2 million, or 1.51%, at year-end.
  • Nonperforming loans were $93.9 million, or 2.23% of loans, versus $112.2 million, or 2.76%, at year-end. Criticized loans declined $23.0 million, or 8%, from year-end, but nonaccrual loans excluding loans held for sale increased $8.3 million. Commercial real estate represented the largest share of nonperforming loans.
  • Other real estate owned fell to $16.0 million from $30.0 million at year-end. The company completed sales of previously nonperforming loans held for sale, recognizing a $2.9 million gain.

Outlook, unusual items and risks

  • No specific earnings or full-year financial guidance is provided. Management expects continued net interest margin challenges, citing low rates and asset repricing.
  • Q3 included a $1.9 million fee from termination of a mortgage-banking joint venture. The company said it was exploring strategic options for residential mortgage originations.
  • A third-quarter external fraud involving fraudulent wire transfers through a commercial client’s compromised computer system resulted in a $3.5 million loss. The company filed an insurance claim subject to up to a $0.5 million deductible, but had not recognized a recovery; it was pursuing other recovery strategies and enhanced security procedures.
  • A class action concerning an IRA account interest-rate promise was dismissed on summary judgment in August 2012; plaintiffs appealed. Management stated that other material legal proceedings were not expected to have a material adverse effect.
  • Other disclosed risks include credit deterioration, real estate values, interest-rate and securities valuation exposure, regulatory changes, competition, and cybercrime. Pooled trust-preferred securities had a $52.7 million book value and $23.1 million fair value; their valuations depend on modeled cash flows and other significant unobservable assumptions. No credit-related impairment charge was recorded in the first nine months.

Key facts for investors to verify

  • Whether the improvement in earnings persists without the joint-venture termination fee, loan-sale gains and favorable derivative valuation changes.
  • Trends in net interest margin and funding mix, including higher short-term borrowings and upcoming asset and certificate-of-deposit repricing.
  • Credit performance in commercial real estate and construction, nonaccrual loans, troubled restructurings, and adequacy of the allowance.
  • Outcome of the insurance claim and other recovery efforts related to the $3.5 million fraud loss.
  • Appeal status of the IRA class action and potential effects of valuation assumptions for pooled trust-preferred securities.