Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. quarterly report, Q3 FY2017

Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. — Q3 2017 Form 10-Q

Reporting period: Quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2017. Dollar amounts are in millions unless noted.

Business context and comparability

Knight-Swift provides truckload, intermodal, brokerage and logistics services. The merger of Knight and Swift closed September 8, 2017; Knight was the accounting acquirer. Accordingly, 2017 reported results include Swift only from September 8 onward, while 2016 comparatives reflect Knight alone. Reported year-over-year comparisons are therefore not like-for-like.

Key financial results

MetricQ3 2017Q3 2016YTD 2017YTD 2016
Total revenue$521.6$280.5$1,066.0$828.9
Operating income$5.8$36.9$56.9$113.7
Net income attributable to Knight-Swift$3.9$23.8$36.7$71.7
Diluted EPS$0.04$0.29$0.41$0.88
GAAP operating ratio98.9%86.8%94.7%86.3%
Adjusted operating ratio (non-GAAP)90.6%85.6%89.7%85.1%

Reported Q3 revenue increased 85.9%, largely reflecting Swift’s inclusion after the merger, not solely underlying growth. Management reported Q3 adjusted net income of $25.5 million and adjusted EPS of $0.25, excluding specified merger, impairment and acquired-intangible amortization items; these are non-GAAP measures.

YTD operating cash flow was $132.3 million, versus $191.7 million in 2016. Investing cash flow was $(22.6) million and financing cash flow was $18.7 million. Net capital expenditures, after equipment sales, were $62.4 million. Cash and equivalents were $136.4 million at quarter-end; an additional $62.7 million was restricted, principally for insurance claims.

Quarter-end working capital was $227.3 million. Unrestricted liquidity was $751.6 million, comprising cash, $590.2 million available on the revolving credit facility and $25.0 million available under Swift’s receivables securitization. Total debt and capital lease obligations were approximately $959.9 million, including $769.7 million of debt excluding capital leases.

Material changes and unusual items

  • Q3 GAAP operating income and net income fell sharply versus Knight-only Q3 2016. Management cited the $16.7 million non-cash impairment of Swift’s terminated ERP implementation and merger-related costs, including $12.3 million of legal and professional fees, $5.6 million of bonuses and accelerated stock compensation, and other merger expenses.
  • Swift contributed $242.8 million of revenue and a $5.5 million net loss from the merger closing through quarter-end. Swift’s reported loss included the ERP impairment and acquired-intangible amortization.
  • The preliminary purchase-price allocation recorded $2.94 billion of merger-related goodwill and $1.29 billion of identifiable intangible assets. The company cautioned that the allocation may change; goodwill is not tax deductible.
  • On September 29, the company entered a new $1.2 billion unsecured credit facility: an $800 million revolver, with $85 million drawn, and a $400 million term loan. The term loan matures in October 2020 and the revolver in October 2022. Borrowings carry variable rates and are subject to leverage and interest-coverage covenants. Swift’s $285 million receivables securitization remained outstanding.

Management outlook, risks and contingencies

  • Management said the freight market strengthened during the quarter and indicated it was supportive of improved rates and utilization. It identified driver recruitment and retention, network disruptions, lower tractor utilization, maintenance inflation and insurance costs as headwinds. No specific numerical earnings or revenue guidance was provided.
  • The company expected to refresh Knight and Swift tractor fleets in coming quarters, with maintenance costs potentially easing over time but depreciation increasing. Management also planned continued investment in logistics technology and to improve Swift Intermodal efficiency.
  • Fuel prices rose year over year. Fuel surcharges recover only part of fuel costs, apply principally to loaded miles and may lag cost changes. A 1% increase in applicable interest rates would reduce annualized pretax earnings by approximately $7.4 million, based on quarter-end borrowings.
  • Recorded accruals for outstanding legal proceedings were approximately $126.2 million. The filing describes probable losses in independent-contractor and wage-related matters; some proceedings could result in material additional liabilities, and outcomes or amounts are uncertain.
  • Principal risks include integration and retention challenges following the merger, driver shortages and wage pressure, claims and insurance exposure, fuel and interest-rate volatility, used-equipment values, debt covenants, customer concentration, regulation and litigation. Management reported disclosure controls were effective, but expected year-end internal-control reporting and auditor attestation to exclude Swift’s controls due to the timing and complexity of integration.

For additional context, unaudited pro forma results assuming the merger had occurred January 1, 2016 showed YTD revenue of $3.78 billion and net income of $83.7 million in 2017, compared with $3.82 billion and $165.6 million in 2016. These figures include pro forma adjustments, exclude certain merger costs and are not forecasts.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • How Swift performs over full reporting periods and whether merger synergies offset integration costs and operating pressures.
  • Underlying operating trends apart from merger effects and one-time adjustments; compare GAAP results with management’s non-GAAP reconciliations.
  • Progress on driver recruiting, tractor utilization, fleet renewal, maintenance expense and Swift Intermodal performance.
  • Final purchase-price allocation, goodwill and intangible-asset assumptions, and any subsequent impairment or tax effects.
  • Debt covenant headroom, variable-rate exposure, receivables-facility availability and cash needed for capital expenditures and leases.
  • Developments in legal matters, insurance reserves and self-insured claims, including whether existing accruals prove adequate.