KULR Technology Group, Inc. quarterly report, Q3 FY2017

Business Context and Reporting Period

KT High-Tech Marketing, Inc. (with subsidiary KULR Technology Corporation; identified in the request as KULR Technology Group) filed this unaudited Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2017. On June 19, 2017, KT High-Tech completed a share exchange that made KULR its wholly owned subsidiary. The transaction was accounted for as a reverse recapitalization: pre-transaction operating results reflect KULR, while KT High-Tech’s assets and liabilities were consolidated from the closing date.

KULR develops carbon-fiber-based thermal-management products and passive thermal-protection solutions for lithium-ion batteries. The interim results are not necessarily indicative of full-year results.

Financial Performance and Position

MetricThree months ended September 30Nine months ended September 30
Revenue$15,106 (2016: $0)$26,006 (2016: $6,900)
Gross loss$37,278 (2016: $0)$82,573 (2016: $849)
Operating expenses$801,916 (2016: $198,091)$1,666,563 (2016: $600,198)
Net loss$839,252 (2016: $197,535)$1,757,850 (2016: $600,221)
Net loss per share, basic and diluted$0.01 (2016: $0.00)$0.03 (2016: $0.01)

Gross margin was negative in both 2017 periods; the filing reports gross losses rather than margin percentages. Cost of revenue exceeded revenue, partly because research and development costs attributable to a sales agreement were included in cost of revenue.

  • Cash flow: Nine-month operating cash use was $263,585, compared with $553,453 in 2016. Investing activities provided $1,907,990, primarily reflecting $1,859,261 of cash acquired in the share exchange and collection of an $85,000 related-party note, partly offset by $36,271 of equipment purchases. There were no financing cash flows in the 2017 period.
  • Liquidity: September 30 cash was $1,653,492 and working capital was $1,050,984. Current liabilities were $806,767; total assets were $1,891,110. Management said cash was sufficient to sustain operations for at least one year from the filing date.
  • Capital and obligations: Stockholders’ equity was $1,084,343, versus a deficiency of $267,161 at December 31, 2016. The balance sheet lists accrued liabilities, including $507,041 owed to related parties, but no separate debt balance is presented.
  • Other metrics: Accumulated deficit was $3,691,660. Stock-based compensation was $411,181 for the nine months; $464,846 remained unrecognized, including an amount subject to remeasurement.

Material Changes Versus the Prior Comparable Period

  • Nine-month revenue rose $19,106, or 277%, from a small prior-year base, but remained modest and below cost of revenue.
  • Nine-month R&D expense increased to $207,504 from $16,173; related-party R&D expense increased to $439,824 from $285,701. Management attributed changes to consulting and service agreements, while noting lower related-party work in the third quarter as more R&D shifted in-house.
  • Nine-month general and administrative expense increased to $1,019,235 from $298,324, reflecting higher stock compensation, payroll, marketing, professional fees, and share-exchange/public-company costs.
  • Cash increased substantially from $9,087 at December 31, 2016, chiefly due to cash acquired in the share exchange. Common shares outstanding rose from 50,000,000 to 77,440,000, including 27,440,000 shares associated with the reverse recapitalization.

Outlook, Risks, and Unusual Items

  • Management expected research and development expenses to continue increasing. The filing provides no quantified revenue, earnings, or cash-flow guidance.
  • Revenue was concentrated among three customers: for the nine months, Customers C, B, and A generated 44%, 42%, and 14%, respectively. The filing also reports $1,225,642 of cash above FDIC insurance limits at September 30.
  • Related-party R&D accruals included $110,000 owed to the CTO and $397,041 to Energy Science Laboratories, a company controlled by the CTO.
  • The company reported ongoing losses and limited revenue. Management’s one-year liquidity assessment depends in part on cash obtained through the share exchange.
  • The filing says disclosure controls were effective, while also citing inadequate recording of certain transactions and communication to personnel involved in disclosure procedures. This qualification warrants attention. Management reported no material changes in internal control over financial reporting.
  • The reverse recapitalization and related stock-based compensation materially affected reported capital and expenses. The filing reported no legal proceedings, defaults upon senior securities, or off-balance-sheet arrangements.

Important Facts for Investors to Verify

  1. Whether customer concentration has changed and whether the company can convert product development into recurring, higher-margin sales.
  2. How R&D spending, related-party consulting, and accrued related-party obligations are governed and funded.
  3. Whether cash levels and operating cash burn support management’s stated liquidity runway, particularly given uninsured deposits.
  4. The nature and remediation of the transaction-recording and disclosure-communication weaknesses described alongside management’s conclusion that controls were effective.
  5. The effects of the reverse recapitalization, share issuance, and remaining stock-based compensation on comparability and dilution.