Marcus & Millichap, Inc. annual report, FY2020

Marcus & Millichap, Inc. — FY2020 Form 10-K

Reporting period: Fiscal year ended December 31, 2020. The filing was signed March 1, 2021. This is an annual report, not a standalone Q4 filing; quarterly results are noted below.

Business context

Marcus & Millichap provides commercial real estate investment sales brokerage, financing, research, and advisory services in the U.S. and Canada. At year-end it had 84 offices and 2,097 investment sales and financing professionals, primarily commission-based independent contractors. Brokerage commissions generated 88% of FY2020 revenue, financing fees 10%, and other services 2%. The company completed four acquisitions during 2020; none was individually material to the financial statements.

Financial performance and liquidity

MetricFY2020FY2019Change
Revenue$716.9 million$806.4 millionDown 11.1%
Operating income$53.6 million$96.4 millionDown 44.4%
Operating margin7.5%12.0%Down 4.5 percentage points
Net income$42.8 million$76.9 millionDown 44.3%
Diluted EPS$1.08$1.95Down 44.6%
Adjusted EBITDA$75.7 million$115.6 millionDown 34.5%
Cash from operations$38.1 million$25.3 millionUp $12.8 million

Net margin was 6.0%, versus 9.5% in 2019. The filing identifies adjusted EBITDA as a non-GAAP measure and cautions it should not replace GAAP results.

  • Brokerage commissions fell 13.2% to $633.2 million as brokerage sales volume declined 13.0%. Brokerage transactions decreased 10.7%; average transaction size fell 2.6%. The average commission rate was comparable year over year.
  • Financing fees rose 6.4% to $70.5 million, with financing volume up 6.9%; other revenue increased 22.5% to $13.2 million. Total closed transactions declined 7.9% to 8,954 and total sales volume fell to $43.4 billion from $49.7 billion.
  • Cash and cash equivalents were $243.2 million; available-for-sale marketable debt securities totaled $206.0 million. Management reported $401.6 million of cash and core-cash investments and $59.5 million of available borrowing capacity.
  • Total assets were $779.1 million, total liabilities $232.3 million, and stockholders’ equity $546.8 million. The $60 million revolving credit facility had no borrowings at year-end; notes payable to former stockholders were fully repaid in April 2020. The company reported $78.6 million in present-value operating lease liabilities.
  • Cash from investing activities was negative $17.2 million, mainly reflecting acquisitions and marketable-security activity; cash used in financing activities was $10.3 million. Year-end cash increased $10.5 million from 2019.

Material changes and quarterly pattern

COVID-19 disruption, particularly from the second quarter, delayed transactions, made asset pricing more difficult, and constrained financing for some borrowers. Activity began recovering in the second half, supported in part by low interest rates and the return of delayed deals. Operating expenses declined only 6.6% while revenue fell 11.1%; SG&A rose 0.7%, and cost of services increased as a share of revenue from 61.9% to 62.5%, contributing to margin compression.

Q4 2020 revenue was $250.2 million versus $237.9 million in Q4 2019; operating income was $30.1 million versus $27.1 million, and net income was $23.6 million versus $20.7 million. Q2 2020 had an operating loss of $2.6 million and net income of $0.1 million. Results are seasonal, typically stronger in the second half, especially Q4.

Outlook, risks, and contingencies

  • Management expected revenue to remain negatively affected for at least the first half of 2021 and stated that the pandemic’s overall effects could not be reliably predicted. Management considered existing liquidity sufficient for operating requirements for at least 12 months.
  • Management described improving investor activity late in 2020, but flagged continued uncertainty around the pandemic, recovery pace, property values, financing availability, tax policy, and demand across property types. Hotels and parts of retail were particularly challenged; performance varied by asset type and market.
  • Key risks include economic and commercial real estate cycles, transaction volume and property values, recruiting and retaining productive professionals, competition, reliance on transaction-based revenue, and California concentration (31% of 2020 revenue). Independent-contractor classification, cyber and technology disruption, and potential changes to tax rules including like-kind exchanges are also disclosed risks.
  • The company implemented expense reductions during the disruption, including compensation reductions, reduced travel and events, layoffs, and suspension of 401(k) matching contributions from May 2020. It recalled some furloughed employees and restored employee compensation reductions, except for the CEO’s voluntarily extended reduction.
  • Contractual obligations totaled $191.8 million, including operating leases, deferred commissions, SARs, and acquisition consideration. The company reported no off-balance-sheet arrangements. It is involved in ordinary-course legal matters and said it did not expect their final outcomes to materially adversely affect its financial position, results, or cash flows.
  • The independent auditor gave an unqualified opinion on the financial statements and internal controls; management also concluded internal controls were effective at year-end.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether transaction volumes, brokerage revenue, and margins recovered after the filing’s stated first-half 2021 headwinds.
  • How the company’s property-type and geographic mix—especially California and challenged retail and hospitality markets—affected results and transaction pipelines.
  • Whether financing-fee growth continued and whether acquisition-related costs, contingent consideration, and advances to professionals developed as expected.
  • Liquidity and investment portfolio values, revolver availability and covenant compliance, and the timing of lease, deferred commission, and SARs payments.
  • Whether the company retained and recruited productive professionals, and whether its independent-contractor model remains legally and operationally sustainable.