Southern California Edison Company — Q2 2010 Form 10-Q
Reporting period: Quarter and six months ended June 30, 2010. SCE is a rate-regulated electric utility and a wholly owned subsidiary of Edison International. Financial statements are unaudited.
Financial performance and position
| Metric | Q2 2010 | Q2 2009 | Six months 2010 | Six months 2009 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating revenue | $2.247 billion | $2.273 billion | $4.406 billion | $4.462 billion |
| Operating income | $404 million | $423 million | $784 million | $862 million |
| Net income | $314 million | $534 million | $491 million | $766 million |
| Net income available for common stock | $301 million | $499 million | $465 million | $707 million |
| Core earnings, non-GAAP | $248 million | $199 million | $451 million | $407 million |
- Calculated operating margin was approximately 18.0% in Q2 2010 versus 18.6% a year earlier, and 17.8% for the first half versus 19.3%.
- First-half operating cash flow was $1.095 billion, down from $2.054 billion. Capital expenditures were $1.757 billion, compared with $1.402 billion; cash and equivalents fell to $85 million from $462 million at year-end 2009.
- At June 30, SCE reported $7.129 billion of long-term debt and $215 million of short-term debt. It had $2.668 billion available under credit facilities, plus $6 million of short-term investments. Its debt-to-total-capitalization ratio was 0.46, below the 0.65 covenant limit.
- Total assets were $34.213 billion and total equity was $8.836 billion. Regulatory assets rose to $5.396 billion from $4.259 billion at year-end.
Changes versus the comparable period
- GAAP common earnings declined $198 million in Q2 and $242 million for the first half. The comparison is heavily affected by discrete tax items: the 2009 periods included a $300 million benefit from the federal tax settlement, while 2010 included a $53 million state tax-settlement benefit and a $40 million tax-method benefit. First-half 2010 also included a $39 million noncash charge from health-care legislation.
- Excluding identified non-core items, management-reported core earnings increased $49 million in Q2 and $44 million year to date. Management attributed the improvement mainly to authorized revenue supporting rate-base growth, lower tax expense, and, year to date, higher allowance for funds used during construction (AFUDC); higher operating costs partly offset the gains.
- Retail billed and unbilled revenue, excluding wholesale sales and balancing-account over/undercollections, increased $57 million in Q2 and $201 million year to date. Higher rates were partly offset by lower sales volume, attributed to milder weather and economic conditions. SCE’s decoupling mechanism limits its volumetric revenue exposure.
- Operating cash flow fell substantially, primarily because 2009 included an $875 million net tax-allocation receipt from Edison International related to the Global Settlement, alongside working-capital timing and lower pretax income.
- Comparability is also affected by SCE’s January 2010 deconsolidation of four qualifying-facility projects under new variable-interest-entity accounting; management reported no gain or loss on deconsolidation.
Outlook, management commentary, and risks
- SCE projected 2010 capital investment of $3.3–$4.0 billion and 2010–2014 spending of $18–$21.5 billion. First-half capital investments, including accruals, were approximately $1.5 billion. Management expected to fund obligations and investment with operating cash, debt and preferred-equity issuance, and available credit facilities.
- SCE’s July 2010 notice of intent for its 2012 general rate case proposed a $6.3 billion base-rate revenue requirement, $903 million above projected 2011 base revenue, and additional proposed increases for 2013 and 2014. These are requests, not approved rates; a final decision was anticipated by year-end 2011.
- The 2010 FERC rate proposal would raise SCE’s FERC revenue requirement by $107 million, or 24%, and was being litigated. Rates were effective subject to refund; a final decision was expected in the second half of 2011. CWIP collections and certain transmission incentives also remained subject to FERC proceedings and potential refund.
- Significant operational and regulatory exposures include possible substantial San Onofre costs or operating effects from once-through-cooling requirements; nuclear-plant performance and regulatory issues; renewable procurement and transmission build-out; and environmental regulation. SCE cautioned that cost recovery from customers is not assured in all cases.
- Environmental remediation liabilities were recorded at a $38 million minimum for 23 identified sites; reasonably possible costs could exceed the recorded amount by up to $223 million. SCE said it expects customer-rate recovery for most remediation costs.
- The Navajo Nation litigation seeks at least $600 million in damages plus interest and at least $1 billion in punitive damages; SCE said it could not predict the outcome. Separately, a court awarded SCE approximately $142 million for DOE spent-fuel delays through 2005, subject to DOE appeal; any recovery is for ratepayer benefit.
- Derivative and collateral exposure bears monitoring: SCE reported a $1.092 billion net derivative liability, largely subject to regulatory recovery or refund mechanisms. Posted collateral was $22 million; a downgrade below investment grade could require an additional $180 million, with further market-related exposure possible.
Most important facts for investors to verify
- Whether earnings comparisons are assessed using GAAP results or management’s non-GAAP core earnings, and how the tax-related items affect each period.
- Progress and final outcomes of the 2012 CPUC rate case, the 2010 FERC rate case, and refund exposure on interim rates and CWIP collections.
- Capital-spending execution, financing needs, and whether operating cash flow can support the announced investment program.
- San Onofre outage, compliance, cooling-retrofit, and steam-generator cost recovery developments.
- Changes in environmental remediation estimates, Navajo litigation, DOE appeal, and derivative/collateral requirements.