STIFEL FINANCIAL CORP quarterly report, Q3 FY2011

Stifel Financial Corp. — Q3 2011 Form 10-Q

Reporting period: Quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2011. Amounts are in U.S. dollars; financial statement amounts are in millions unless stated otherwise. Stifel operates wealth management and brokerage, institutional sales and trading, investment banking, and banking businesses.

Financial performance and position

MetricQ3 2011Q3 2010Nine months 2011Nine months 2010
Total revenue$340.5$344.1$1,078.6$988.8
Net revenue$334.2$340.4$1,059.7$980.4
Net income/(loss)$22.3$(84.3)$57.1$(39.5)
Diluted EPS$0.35$(1.65)$0.90$(0.82)
Pre-tax margin on net revenue11.7%(41.9)%8.8%(6.8)%
  • Revenue mix: Q3 commissions rose 47.7% to $143.2 million; principal transactions fell 37.8% to $76.7 million; investment banking fell 27.1% to $37.7 million. Nine-month net revenue rose 8.1%, supported by commissions, asset management fees, investment banking, and net interest income.
  • Expenses and margins: Non-interest expense was $295.2 million in Q3 and $966.1 million for nine months. Compensation equaled 63.0% and 63.4% of net revenue, respectively. Nine-month other operating expense rose 62.9% to $127.3 million, principally due to OPEB-related litigation and regulatory costs.
  • Cash flow: Operating activities used $129.3 million and investing activities used $620.4 million in the first nine months; financing activities provided $712.1 million. Cash and cash equivalents declined $38.9 million to $214.6 million.
  • Balance sheet and liquidity: Total assets were $4.94 billion and shareholders’ equity was $1.26 billion at September 30, 2011. Bank deposits were $2.12 billion, up from $1.62 billion at year-end 2010. Stifel reported $310.6 million of short-term bank borrowings on the balance sheet; the borrowings note separately reports $259.7 million of bank borrowings and $119.5 million of stock-loan balances. Reconcile these reported amounts when assessing funding.
  • Credit and capital: Bank loans, net of allowance, were $568.3 million, up from $389.7 million; approximately 98.7% of the loan portfolio was collateralized. The allowance for loan losses was $3.8 million. Stifel Nicolaus reported $190.2 million in net capital, $177.8 million above its minimum. Stifel Financial and Stifel Bank reported capital ratios above minimum requirements.

Material changes versus comparable periods

  • Q3 net revenue declined 1.8%, while nine-month net revenue increased 8.1%. Q3 institutional activity was pressured by market volatility and lower fixed-income trading volumes; wealth management commissions and fees grew.
  • Profit comparisons are heavily affected by Q3 2010’s $181.1 million non-cash charge from accelerating deferred compensation after a plan modification, along with other TWPG merger-related expenses. TWPG had been acquired in July 2010, so the nine-month comparisons also reflect different periods of acquired-business contribution.
  • Nine-month assets grew 17.3% from year-end 2010. Bank deposits, securities portfolios, and bank loans expanded, while cash declined.
  • Stifel repurchased 1.7 million shares for $48.5 million during the first nine months. The board authorized an additional 3.0 million shares on November 7, 2011.

Outlook, risks, contingencies, and unusual items

  • Management emphasized revenue growth, advisor recruitment and retention, and client relationships; the filing provides no quantified earnings or revenue guidance. Management cautioned that results depend on market activity, asset values, financing and underwriting volumes, and interest rates.
  • Management described difficult municipal markets, weak demand for longer-dated municipal securities, and investor concern about European debt, U.S. economic data, and budget uncertainty. The company also cited regulatory change, including the Dodd-Frank Act, as a potential source of cost and business-model risk.
  • OPEB litigation: The SEC sued Stifel in August 2011 over CDO sales to five Wisconsin school districts. The districts’ related state-court case concerns $200 million of investments and seeks unspecified, potentially substantial damages; dismissal motions had been denied. Stifel purchased approximately $162.5 million face value of Depfa notes at a substantial discount and recorded related provisions, but the filing does not give a clear amount for those provisions. The company intends to defend the claims.
  • ARS commitments: Stifel estimated $45.3 million par value of client auction-rate securities remained for repurchase by December 31, 2011 under its regulatory agreement, assuming no issuer redemptions. Separate TWP customer agreements could involve up to $38.6 million par value over five years, also assuming no redemptions. Estimated liabilities depend on redemptions and fair values.
  • Other risks include market and counterparty exposure, short-sale losses, liquidity and subsidiary-distribution constraints, and legal or regulatory claims. Derivative agreements had a $26.9 million termination value in a net liability position; $32.9 million of collateral had been posted. Stifel reported no goodwill impairment in its July 2011 annual test.
  • Stone & Youngberg was acquired on October 1, 2011, after quarter-end; consideration included cash and stock plus a contingent earn-out. The filing reports a $0.2 million FINRA fine for TWP, subject to the stated appeal process.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Reconcile the balance-sheet short-term borrowing figure with the borrowing and securities-lending balances described in the notes.
  • Review the size, timing, and potential range of OPEB-related provisions and litigation exposure; the filing does not provide a clear quantified total.
  • Track completion and cash cost of the remaining ARS repurchases, including the separate TWP customer agreements and possible issuer redemptions.
  • Assess whether growth in bank assets and deposits, increased interest costs, and the reported operating cash outflow remain sustainable.
  • Separate underlying operating performance from the unusually large 2010 deferred-compensation charge and the differing TWPG comparison periods.
  • Monitor the post-quarter Stone & Youngberg acquisition, including contingent earn-out obligations, and the effect of the expanded share-repurchase authorization.