ENERGY FUELS INC annual report, FY2021

Energy Fuels Inc. — FY2021 Form 10-K

Reporting period: Fiscal year ended December 31, 2021. This is an annual filing, not a standalone fourth-quarter report. Financial amounts are U.S. dollars unless stated otherwise.

Business context

Energy Fuels is a U.S.-focused uranium producer and processor, operating the White Mesa Mill in Utah and holding conventional and in-situ recovery (ISR) projects, most of which were on standby. In 2021, the company began commercial-scale production of rare earth carbonate from third-party monazite sands and continued evaluating recovery of medical radioisotopes. It also produces vanadium when market conditions warrant.

Key financial metrics

MetricFY2021FY2020
Revenue$3.18 million$1.66 million
Gross profit$1.37 million$0.01 million
Operating loss$35.43 million$24.63 million
Net income (loss)$1.45 million($27.87 million)
Cash used in operating activities$29.29 million$32.18 million
Cash and cash equivalents at year-end$112.52 million$20.17 million
Working capital at year-end$143.19 millionNot stated here
Total debtNoneNone

Revenue comprised $1.39 million from rare earth concentrates, $1.73 million from alternate-feed-material processing and other sources, and $0.07 million from vanadium concentrates. No uranium concentrate sales were recorded. Gross margin was approximately 43% of revenue, based on reported gross profit.

FY2021 net income included a $35.73 million gain on the sale of non-core assets to Consolidated Uranium Inc. (CUR). Excluding that gain, the company remained loss-making at the operating level. Other income included fair-value gains on investments, offset in part by an $8.08 million increase in warrant-liability expense.

Year-end total assets were $315.45 million, including $38.54 million of investments accounted for at fair value and $30.77 million of current inventories. Total liabilities were $19.92 million; shareholders’ equity was $291.58 million. Asset retirement obligations were $13.69 million recorded, with $41.34 million of undiscounted decommissioning liabilities; $20.31 million of restricted cash was posted as collateral.

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash increased by $91.84 million to $132.82 million. Financing provided $117.94 million, principally $106.21 million net proceeds from ATM share sales, plus $9.84 million from warrant exercises. The increase in liquidity was therefore primarily equity-funded, while operating activities used cash.

Material changes versus FY2020

  • Revenue rose to $3.18 million from $1.66 million, chiefly as rare earth carbonate sales began; reported rare earth revenue was $1.39 million.
  • The company moved from a $27.87 million net loss to $1.45 million net income, largely because of the $35.73 million disposal gain—not an improvement in operating performance. Operating loss widened by $10.80 million.
  • Development, permitting and land-holding costs increased to $10.75 million from $4.33 million; standby costs rose to $9.46 million from $4.02 million.
  • Cash and cash equivalents rose substantially, primarily through ATM issuance. Shares outstanding increased from 134.3 million to 156.3 million during the year.
  • The company sold non-core uranium properties to CUR for $2 million cash at closing, CUR shares representing a 19.9% interest immediately after closing, deferred cash payments and production payments. Its CUR investment was valued at $32.23 million at year-end.

Outlook, risks and unusual items

  • 2022 operating expectations: Recover 100,000–120,000 pounds of uranium at the Mill and produce 650–1,000 tonnes of mixed rare earth carbonate containing 300–450 tonnes of total rare earth oxide, subject to sufficient monazite supply. No material uranium output was planned from Nichols Ranch; Alta Mesa and conventional mines were expected to remain on standby. No vanadium production was planned, though the company was evaluating a campaign.
  • Uranium sales: No 2022 uranium sales commitments had been entered into as of the filing. Production could be added to inventory or sold on the spot market; management was seeking term contracts at prices that support production. The proposed U.S. Uranium Reserve was not established, and its timing and benefit to the company were uncertain.
  • Rare earths: Production was ramping up with limited throughput and underutilized-capacity costs. Chemours was the only current monazite supplier; supply, product sales, economics, permitting and financing for a U.S. separation facility remain key uncertainties. Management said it expected profits from the initiative to remain minimal during ramp-up.
  • Liquidity and capital: Management said available cash and potential inventory sales were expected to fund the business plan for at least 12 months. Continued low commodity prices or unsuccessful new initiatives could require additional financing or other measures. The company had shelf and ATM capacity, creating potential dilution.
  • Legal, environmental and project risks: Mill groundwater remediation scope and cost remain undetermined and could be significant; tribal and environmental challenges to Mill permits were pending or stayed. The Ninth Circuit ruled in the company’s favor in the Pinyon Plain litigation in February 2022, but further appeals were possible. Roca Honda remained subject to permitting, and Sheep Mountain’s processing approach was unresolved.
  • Other material exposure: Commodity prices, foreign-government-supported supply, permitting delays, mineral-resource estimation, reclamation costs, and the technical and commercial success of rare-earth and radioisotope initiatives could materially affect results. Only Sheep Mountain had disclosed mineral reserves under the filing’s stated standards.
  • Audit and controls: KPMG issued an unqualified audit opinion on the financial statements and internal controls; management reported effective controls and no material weaknesses. The auditor identified asset-retirement-obligation assumptions, including discount and inflation rates, as a critical audit matter.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • How much of FY2021’s reported profit reflects the CUR asset-sale gain and investment fair-value movements, versus recurring operations.
  • Whether rare-earth feed supply, output, recoveries, sales and margins meet the 2022 expectations, and what capital and licensing a separation facility would require.
  • Whether the company secures uranium term contracts or government purchases at prices sufficient to justify restarting standby assets.
  • Cash burn, planned development spending, ATM usage and resulting share dilution; also confirm the distinction between unrestricted cash and restricted collateral.
  • Potential cost and timing of Mill remediation, reclamation obligations and surety collateral, along with the status of permit challenges and project appeals.
  • Resource and reserve assumptions, including the substantial uncertainty that the filing says applies to mineral resources and projects without declared reserves.