WEC ENERGY GROUP, INC. quarterly report, Q3 FY2011

Business context and reporting period

Wisconsin Energy Corporation’s unaudited Form 10-Q covers the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2011. The company operates regulated electric, gas and steam utilities and a non-utility energy business, primarily We Power, which leases generating assets to Wisconsin Electric. All figures below are in millions of dollars unless noted.

Financial performance and position

MetricQ3 2011Q3 2010Nine months 2011Nine months 2010
Operating revenue$1,052.8$973.2$3,373.2$3,112.7
Operating income$224.3$203.0$694.3$594.7
Continuing-operations income$129.8$112.3$398.7$328.8
Net income$129.8$112.2$410.2$330.6
Diluted EPS$0.55$0.47$1.74$1.40
Operating cash flowNot presented quarterlyNot presented quarterly$827.6$653.7
  • Quarterly revenue grew 8.2%; nine-month revenue grew 8.4%. Operating income increased 10.5% for the quarter and 16.7% year to date. Reported operating margins were approximately 21.3% and 20.6%, respectively.
  • Reported year-over-year income comparisons are affected by Point Beach sale-gain amortization: $55.2 in Q3 2010 and $151.8 in the first nine months of 2010, versus none in 2011. The company says customer bill credits associated with that gain were fully applied by the end of 2010.
  • Q3 utility-segment operating income was $135.6, up $1.4; non-utility operating income was $89.8, up $20.8. The non-utility increase principally reflects Oak Creek expansion lease revenue, including a full quarter for OC 2, which entered service in January 2011.
  • For the first nine months, operating cash flow was $827.6, capital expenditures were $612.2, and cash used in investing activities was $650.3. Cash and cash equivalents were $15.1 at September 30, compared with $24.5 at year-end 2010; restricted cash was $45.5.
  • At September 30, long-term debt was $4,618.9, current maturities $31.8, and short-term debt $496.7. Total debt was $5,147.4; debt to total capitalization was 56.5% (53.7% on the company’s adjusted, non-GAAP basis for rating-agency treatment of junior notes). Available undrawn bank credit was approximately $1.2 billion.
  • Capital spending was higher year over year, driven in part by Oak Creek environmental controls and Glacier Hills Wind Park. Management estimated 2011 consolidated capital expenditures of approximately $900.

Changes, outlook and significant developments

  • Quarterly diluted EPS from continuing operations rose to $0.55 from $0.47; nine-month diluted EPS from continuing operations rose to $1.69 from $1.39. Nine-month net income also included $11.5 from discontinued operations, mainly from a favorable resolution of tax positions related to a discontinued manufacturing business.
  • Revenue growth included reduced Point Beach customer bill credits, rate increases, increased energy sales into the MISO market and, for gas, colder weather in the first half. Weaker-than-prior-year cooling weather reduced electric revenue; electric sales volumes overall were also influenced by increased sales to two iron ore mines.
  • Net interest expense increased to $56.8 in Q3 and $177.6 for nine months, principally because less interest was capitalized after OC 2 entered service. Wisconsin Electric issued $300 of 2.95% debentures due 2021 in September; the company also issued $420 of long-term notes in January and retired $450 of debt at maturity in April.
  • Cash provided by operations benefited from higher earnings, deferred tax benefits and the absence of prior-year Point Beach gain amortization, but was reduced by $257.4 of qualified benefit-plan contributions. Management expected the operating-cash-flow trend to continue through year-end.
  • Management forecast a 2011 annual effective tax rate of 34%–35%. No full-year earnings guidance is stated in the supplied filing text.
  • The PSCW approved the utilities’ proposed 2012 Wisconsin rate-case alternative on October 6, 2011: no 2012 base-rate increase, with specified regulatory-cost and project-cost treatment and a 2013 rate proceeding. The final written order was pending when reported. A $50 fuel-cost rate request was filed, with new fuel rates expected in January 2012; a separate $26 DOE settlement refund to customers was expected to partly offset it. Wisconsin Electric also sought a $17.5 Michigan rate increase and expected to self-implement $7.7 subject to refund.
  • The board authorized up to $300 of share repurchases through 2013; approximately $75 had been repurchased under the program through September 30. For 2012–2015, the company targeted a dividend payout ratio trending to 60% of earnings and management intended to recommend a 13%–15% dividend increase for 2012.
  • Material uncertainties include evolving air- and water-quality regulations and potential compliance costs, particularly at Presque Isle and Valley; a pending ERISA cash-balance pension-plan lawsuit, for which the company could not predict the outcome; and a new stray-voltage lawsuit, which the company said it would defend. Manufactured-gas-plant remediation costs were estimated at $35–$65 over ten years, with $45.1 reserved. Management said known environmental contingencies beyond recorded or disclosed amounts were not expected to be material overall.
  • Management reported adequate funding capacity through internal cash generation, borrowing facilities and capital-market access, while noting exposure to credit ratings, market access, construction execution, regulation, weather, fuel costs, outages and litigation. There were no material changes in market-risk disclosures or risk factors; disclosure controls were assessed as effective.

Most important facts for investors to verify

  • How much earnings growth persists after separating the prior-year Point Beach gain amortization effect and the 2011 tax-resolution benefit.
  • Whether the 2012 Wisconsin and Michigan rate outcomes and fuel-cost recovery requests provide timely recovery of generation, environmental and other costs.
  • Actual capital spending, construction progress and eventual costs for Oak Creek environmental controls, Glacier Hills Wind Park and the biomass project.
  • Debt, liquidity and cash-flow trends, including the impact of benefit-plan contributions, dividends, repurchases and planned financing.
  • Final outcomes and financial exposure from the pension-plan litigation and environmental rules, especially requirements affecting Presque Isle and Valley.