AMERICAN COASTAL INSURANCE Corp quarterly report, Q2 FY2011

Business context and reporting period

United Insurance Holdings Corp. (the registrant named in the filing) filed this unaudited Form 10-Q for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2011. It writes and services property and casualty insurance, primarily homeowners, in Florida and South Carolina; a new Cayman Islands subsidiary, UPC Re, began providing reinsurance protection to its insurance subsidiary. The filing identifies the company as United Insurance Holdings Corp., not American Coastal Insurance Corp. Unless stated otherwise, financial amounts below are in thousands of dollars.

Financial performance and position

  • Second-quarter revenue and earnings: Total revenue was $23.995 million, up from $19.369 million a year earlier. Net premiums earned rose to $22.299 million from $16.300 million. Net income was $89,000, or $0.01 per diluted share, versus $195,000, or $0.02 per share.
  • First-half revenue and earnings: Total revenue was $44.463 million, compared with $36.317 million. Net income was $1.213 million, or $0.12 per share, compared with a $3.504 million net loss, or $0.33 per share.
  • Losses and expenses: Second-quarter losses and loss adjustment expenses (LAE) rose to $12.601 million from $8.546 million. First-half losses and LAE were nearly flat at $20.985 million versus $21.015 million. Losses and LAE were 56.5% of net premiums earned in Q2, versus 52.4% a year earlier; for the first half, the ratio was 50.7%, versus 67.8%. These are calculated ratios, not company-reported measures.
  • Cash flow and liquidity: Operating cash flow for the first half was $49.575 million, up from $23.879 million. Cash and cash equivalents fell to $46.960 million from $71.644 million at year-end, chiefly as investment purchases exceeded sales and maturities. The company said available capital and operating cash should meet currently anticipated working-capital needs, while cautioning that this is not assured.
  • Investments and equity: Investments were $131.523 million, up from $54.598 million at year-end. Stockholders’ equity was $46.638 million, versus $45.293 million. Net unrealized investment gains were $565,000 before tax, compared with net unrealized losses of $352,000 at year-end.
  • Debt: Notes payable totaled $17.647 million, down from $18.235 million at year-end; the variable interest rate was 3.47% at June 30. The company reported compliance with debt covenants.

Material changes and management commentary

  • Gross premiums written increased 17% in Q2 to $65.296 million and 27% in the first half to $116.071 million. Management attributed growth to more policies in Florida, new South Carolina business, and rate increases.
  • A 15.9% average rate increase on Florida homeowners policies took effect in May 2011. Management noted that rate increases may take up to two years to fully affect net income and expected continued improvement in the current accident-year loss ratio as the year progressed.
  • Net investment income declined to $700,000 in Q2 from $968,000 and to $1.234 million for the first half from $2.016 million. Management attributed the decline to replacing higher-yield corporate bonds sold in late 2010 with lower-yield government and agency securities.
  • First-half operating cash flow benefited from premium collections and the timing of reinsurance payments. The company recorded an $85.703 million payable for 2011–2012 reinsurance premiums; it expected to pay $30.492 million in Q3, $38.824 million in Q4, and $16.387 million in the first four months of 2012.

Outlook, risks, contingencies, and unusual items

  • The company gave no specific numerical earnings or revenue guidance. It was preparing to begin writing policies in Massachusetts in Q4 2011 and had license applications pending in three other states.
  • Catastrophe exposure and reinsurance are significant risks. For the 2011–2012 program, the company retains the first $15 million of hurricane losses and the first $25 million of non-hurricane catastrophe losses per event; losses beyond reinsurance limits remain its responsibility. It also remains liable if reinsurers fail to pay.
  • Commutation of the 2005 Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund contract resulted in $892,000 of catastrophe losses related to Hurricane Wilma. The company recorded a $12.738 million receivable expected in Q3 2011, but future losses from the 2005 contract year beyond amounts reported by June 1 are not covered by that contract.
  • Other risks cited include reserve-estimation uncertainty, severe weather, reinsurance costs and recoverability, regulatory and rate-approval changes, competition, investment-market and interest-rate changes, litigation, and compliance with financial covenants. Ordinary-course claims-related litigation is disclosed; no specific material litigation amount is provided.
  • UPC reported statutory policyholders’ surplus of $47.679 million at June 30 and met applicable regulatory requirements. However, its statutory net loss was $4.814 million for the first half, despite consolidated GAAP net income. Insurance-subsidiary dividends are restricted by regulation.
  • Unusual items included the $892,000 Wilma-related commutation loss and a $302,000 charge that reduced a related-party limited partnership interest to zero. The filing states there were no subsequent events requiring disclosure and no material changes to previously disclosed risk factors.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Confirm the issuer identity: this filing is for United Insurance Holdings Corp.; reconcile that with the requested American Coastal Insurance Corp. name.
  • Track catastrophe losses, reserve development, and whether reinsurance recoverables—including the $12.738 million FHCF receivable—are collected as expected.
  • Monitor the timing and payment of the $85.703 million reinsurance payable and the effect on cash and liquidity.
  • Assess whether premium growth and the Florida rate increases translate into sustained underwriting profitability, given Q2 losses and LAE growth.
  • Review statutory surplus, regulatory dividend restrictions, and ongoing compliance with the SBA note’s surplus and premium-writing covenants.