CSP INC quarterly report, Q3 FY2016

CSP Inc. — Form 10-Q Summary

Reporting period: Fiscal third quarter and nine months ended June 30, 2016; comparative periods ended June 30, 2015. Amounts below are in U.S. dollars. CSP develops and markets IT integration solutions and high-performance cluster computer systems through its High Performance Products (HPP) and Technology Solutions (TS) segments. Financial statements are unaudited.

Financial performance

MetricThree months 2016Three months 2015Nine months 2016Nine months 2015
Revenue$26.9 million$22.3 million$77.7 million$61.6 million
Gross profit / margin$7.2 million / 27%$5.3 million / 24%$18.7 million / 24%$13.3 million / 22%
Operating income (loss)$1.9 million$0.7 million$3.1 million$(0.9) million
Net income (loss)$1.3 million$0.2 million$2.0 million$(0.9) million
Diluted EPS$0.32$0.07$0.52$(0.25)

For the quarter, revenue grew 21%; TS contributed $21.3 million and HPP $5.6 million. For the nine-month period, revenue rose 26%; TS contributed $65.9 million and HPP $11.9 million. HPP’s nine-month revenue included $3.2 million of royalties, versus $2.0 million in the prior-year period.

Cash, liquidity and balance sheet

  • Nine-month operating cash flow was $2.5 million, compared with cash used of $3.5 million a year earlier. Investing activities used $0.6 million and financing activities used $1.2 million, including $1.25 million of dividends. Cash increased $0.4 million to $11.6 million from September 30, 2015.
  • At June 30, 2016, current assets were $41.4 million and current liabilities $18.1 million. Total liabilities were $27.5 million; pension and retirement plan liabilities totaled $10.1 million. The balance sheet does not show a borrowing balance; the filing does not provide a clear debt balance or line-of-credit capacity.
  • Foreign subsidiaries held approximately $6.8 million of cash, which management considers permanently reinvested abroad. Management said cash, operating cash generation and available credit lines should cover foreseeable working-capital and capital-expenditure needs.
  • The company paid dividends of $0.33 per share during the nine-month period. Accounts receivable rose $1.4 million from September 2015, while deferred revenue rose $0.7 million.

Material changes and operating drivers

  • Quarterly revenue gains came from both segments, with TS up $3.0 million and HPP up $1.7 million. Nine-month gains were led by TS, up $13.5 million, while HPP increased $2.6 million.
  • Gross margin improved in both periods. HPP benefited from higher-margin Multicomputer product mix; TS benefited from improved product margins and service margins, including better U.K. contract performance. Some U.S. TS product orders had above-average margins that management characterized as favorable one-time events.
  • Nine-month operating results improved from a loss to income, primarily on higher gross profit; higher SG&A partly offset the improvement. SG&A rose 12% year over year for the nine-month period.
  • Quarterly customer concentration was notable: three customers accounted for 13%, 11% and 10% of revenue, respectively. For the nine-month period, two customers represented 15% and 14% of revenue.

Outlook, risks and controls

  • Management expected to recognize royalties associated with one aircraft in fiscal Q4 2016. The filing gives no broader revenue or earnings guidance.
  • Management cited dependence on a small number of customers, substantial reliance on U.S. federal government contracts, possible single-source component supply, intense competition, and rapid technology change and short product life cycles as risks.
  • Disclosure controls and procedures were concluded to be ineffective as of June 30, 2016. A previously identified material weakness in revenue-recognition monitoring had not been determined to be remediated. It involved verifying revenue recognition criteria, assessing gross-versus-net presentation, and balance-sheet reconciliations. The company described enhanced corporate review and accounting staffing changes as remediation measures but said it could not yet conclude remediation was complete.
  • Management’s estimates involve areas including receivable and inventory reserves, revenue recognition, taxes, retirement plans and contingencies; actual results may differ. The company was evaluating the potential effects of new accounting standards, including revenue recognition and leases.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether the Q4 royalty recognition occurred as expected and how much revenue it generated.
  • Whether quarterly margin gains, especially the TS one-time favorable orders, are repeatable.
  • Customer and government-contract concentration, and the potential impact of changes in major customer demand.
  • Progress in remediating the revenue-recognition material weakness and whether controls are subsequently deemed effective.
  • Availability and terms of credit lines, since the filing does not specify their capacity, and the practical availability of cash held overseas.
  • Potential exposure from pension obligations, inventory obsolescence reserves, and other commitments or contingencies; the filing text provides no specific quantified contingency amount.