EXPAND ENERGY Corp quarterly report, Q2 FY2016

Business context and reporting period

The supplied filing is Chesapeake Energy Corporation’s unaudited Form 10-Q for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2016, filed August 4, 2016. This does not match the request metadata naming EXPAND ENERGY Corp; verify the issuer before relying on this summary. Chesapeake is a U.S. oil and gas producer with marketing, gathering and compression operations.

Financial and operating performance

Amounts are in millions of dollars unless otherwise indicated.

MetricQ2 2016Q2 2015Six months 2016Six months 2015
Total revenue$1,622$3,521$3,575$6,739
Loss from operations$(1,757)$(5,507)$(2,709)$(10,547)
Net loss$(1,750)$(4,090)$(2,671)$(7,810)
Net loss per diluted common share$(2.48)$(6.27)$(3.97)$(11.99)
Cash from (used in) operating activitiesNot provided quarterlyNot provided quarterly$(326)$737
  • Q2 production was 60 million barrels of oil equivalent (mmboe), or about 657 thousand boe per day, down 7% from Q1. Six-month production was 121 mmboe, down 4% year over year. Oil and NGL volumes declined; natural gas volumes were broadly stable.
  • Q2 oil, gas and NGL sales before derivative effects were $884 million, down $380 million year over year, reflecting lower prices and volumes. The average realized price excluding derivatives was $14.76/boe, versus $19.77/boe.
  • Oil and gas property impairment was $1.045 billion in Q2 and $1.898 billion for the six months, compared with $5.015 billion and $9.991 billion in the comparable 2015 periods. These noncash write-downs were the principal driver of reported losses.
  • Q2 marketing, gathering and compression operations recorded a $25 million loss before depreciation, versus a $209 million margin in Q2 2015; six-month results were a $7 million loss versus a $184 million margin.
  • At June 30, cash was $4 million; current assets were $1.204 billion and current liabilities $3.777 billion, a $2.573 billion working-capital deficit. Total assets were $13.487 billion and total equity $229 million; Chesapeake stockholders’ equity was a $32 million deficit.
  • Debt principal was $8.679 billion ($9.649 billion net carrying amount). The company reported $100 million drawn on its $4.0 billion revolving facility, $813 million utilized for letters of credit, and $3.087 billion of available borrowing capacity. It was in compliance with credit-facility financial covenants at quarter-end.

Material changes versus the prior comparable period

  • Six-month revenue fell 47% year over year, while the net loss narrowed substantially, mainly because the prior-year period included much larger property impairments and a $2.878 billion income-tax benefit that was absent in 2016.
  • Operating cash flow shifted from $737 million provided to $326 million used. Management attributed the deterioration chiefly to lower realized commodity prices.
  • Cash declined from $825 million at December 31, 2015 to $4 million at June 30, 2016. Six-month investing cash use was $99 million, versus $2.512 billion in 2015, while financing cash use was $396 million.
  • Six-month capital investment, including capitalized interest, was approximately $820 million, down 66% from approximately $2.4 billion. Average operated rigs fell to nine from 40.
  • The company received $964 million in net proceeds from noncore asset sales and recorded $168 million of gains from debt repurchases and exchanges. Debt exchanges and conversions also increased common shares issued to 776.7 million from 664.8 million at year-end 2015.

Outlook, risks and unusual items

  • Management forecast 2016 capital expenditures, including capitalized interest, of $1.3–$1.8 billion, funded through operating cash flow, cash, asset-sale proceeds and the revolving credit facility. It stated it expected to meet planned spending, debt service and other obligations over the next 12 months, while warning that persistent low prices could impair covenant compliance and scheduled debt payments in 2017.
  • The company expected another oil and gas property write-down in Q3 2016; the amount could be affected by commodity prices, reserve revisions and anticipated divestitures. It also expected negative price-related proved-reserve revisions of about 2.5% at September 30, based on then-current assumptions.
  • Debt maturities or holder put rights totaled $1.382 billion in 2017, including $730 million of contingent convertible notes puttable in May, and $846 million in 2018. The April credit amendment reaffirmed the $4.0 billion borrowing base, postponed redetermination until June 2017 and provided temporary covenant relief, but also pledged substantial assets and imposed a minimum-liquidity requirement.
  • Credit-rating downgrades led to collateral requests. As of August 1, the company reported approximately $274 million posted and potential additional requests of approximately $664 million. A $439 million judgment related to the 2019 notes redemption litigation was accrued; a $461 million supersedeas bond used credit-facility capacity during appeal.
  • Preferred dividends were suspended in January 2016; $85 million was in arrears at June 30. Common dividends were also suspended. Commodity hedges provided downside protection but created material mark-to-market volatility; commodity derivative fair value was a net liability of $292 million at quarter-end.
  • Legal and regulatory exposures include royalty and antitrust claims, investigations, shareholder and noteholder litigation, and environmental matters. The filing says some potential losses are not estimable. A Texas royalty MDL settlement covering plaintiffs representing over 97% of affected hydrocarbons involved approximately $29 million cash and a $10 million promissory note, with further claims possible.
  • Other significant commitments include $13.461 billion of undiscounted gathering, processing and transportation obligations, plus minimum future drilling and pressure-pumping payments of approximately $177 million and $155 million, respectively.

Key facts investors should verify

  1. Confirm the issuer: the provided filing identifies Chesapeake Energy Corporation, not EXPAND ENERGY Corp.
  2. Review liquidity runway, asset-sale assumptions, collateral demands and the full terms and covenant tests of the amended revolving credit facility.
  3. Check the timing and amount of 2017 maturities and put rights, especially the May 2017 contingent-note put, and the company’s refinancing capacity.
  4. Track commodity prices, hedge settlements and mark-to-market effects, reserve revisions, and subsequent full-cost ceiling impairments.
  5. Assess outcomes and potential additional costs from the 2019 notes judgment, royalty and antitrust proceedings, and other contingencies.
  6. Validate the 2016 capital-spending outlook against actual operating cash flow, divestiture proceeds and production trends.