FIRST CAPITAL INC quarterly report, Q1 FY2017

First Capital, Inc. — Q1 2017 Form 10-Q

Period and business: Unaudited results for the three months ended March 31, 2017, compared with Q1 2016; balance sheet comparisons are to December 31, 2016. First Capital is a savings and loan holding company whose principal subsidiary is First Harrison Bank. Amounts below are in U.S. dollars; financial statement amounts are generally shown in millions.

Key financial results

MetricQ1 2017 / March 31, 2017Comparable period / prior date
Interest income$6.343 million$6.346 million in Q1 2016
Net interest income$5.984 million$5.846 million in Q1 2016
Net interest income after loan-loss provision$5.773 million$5.771 million in Q1 2016
Noninterest income$1.453 million$1.368 million in Q1 2016
Noninterest expense$5.155 million$4.990 million in Q1 2016
Net income attributable to First Capital$1.553 million; $0.46 per share$1.582 million; $0.47 per share
Cash flow from operations$4.825 million$2.893 million in Q1 2016
Total assets$761.9 million$743.7 million at Dec. 31, 2016
Net loans$385.1 million$381.2 million at Dec. 31, 2016
Total deposits$681.7 million$664.7 million at Dec. 31, 2016
Cash and cash equivalents$47.7 million$45.8 million at Dec. 31, 2016
Available-for-sale securities$272.2 million$255.8 million at Dec. 31, 2016
Stockholders’ equity attributable to First Capital$77.1 million$75.7 million at Dec. 31, 2016

Performance, changes, and financial condition

  • Net income attributable to First Capital declined about 1.8% year over year. Net interest income rose $138,000, primarily from a larger average balance of interest-earning assets, partly offset by a lower interest-rate spread.
  • The reported interest-rate spread was 3.44%, versus 3.49% in Q1 2016. Average interest-earning assets were $704.4 million with a 3.70% tax-equivalent yield, compared with $671.3 million and 3.88%. The filing does not provide a clear net interest margin value.
  • Interest expense fell $141,000 as the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities declined from 0.39% to 0.26%; the average balance of those liabilities increased from $514.2 million to $546.7 million. Acquired-loan accretion income fell to $35,000 from $284,000.
  • Noninterest income increased $85,000, mainly from higher deposit service charges. Noninterest expense rose $165,000, principally due to a $161,000 increase in net losses on foreclosed real estate and a $111,000 increase in data-processing costs.
  • The provision for loan losses increased to $211,000 from $75,000, which management attributed primarily to loan growth. Net charge-offs were $179,000 versus $171,000. The allowance was $3.418 million, compared with $3.386 million at year-end.
  • Nonperforming loans rose to $3.210 million from $3.024 million at year-end; this included $143,000 of loans at least 90 days past due that continued to accrue interest. Foreclosed real estate was $4.417 million. Foreclosed-property write-downs were $228,000 in Q1 2017 versus $83,000 in Q1 2016.
  • Deposits increased 2.6%. Noninterest-bearing deposits rose $16.9 million; interest-bearing demand and savings balances increased $2.7 million, while time deposits decreased $2.5 million. Management cited new accounts and customers shifting away from longer-term deposits in the low-rate environment.
  • Operating cash flow was $4.825 million; investing activities used $19.311 million, and financing activities provided $16.308 million, including a $17.009 million net increase in deposits. Cash and cash equivalents increased $1.822 million during the quarter.
  • The balance sheet reports deposits and other accrued liabilities but no separate borrowing balance; a total debt figure is not clearly provided. Management says the Bank can access additional borrowing capacity from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis and collateral for repurchase agreements.
  • The Bank was reported well-capitalized and compliant with regulatory requirements: Tier 1 leverage 9.3%, Tier 1 risk-based 14.1%, common equity Tier 1 risk-based 14.1%, and total risk-based capital 14.8%.

Outlook, risks, and unusual items

  • The filing gives no specific earnings, revenue, or growth guidance. Management cautions that interim results are not necessarily indicative of full-year performance.
  • Management describes interest-rate risk as a key exposure. Its one-year net-interest-income simulation estimated a 7.11% increase under an immediate, sustained 300-basis-point rate rise and a 3.55% decline under a 100-basis-point fall. These are model outputs, not forecasts or guarantees.
  • Economic-value-of-equity modeling estimated a 0.99% decline under a 300-basis-point rate rise and a 0.77% increase under a 100-basis-point decline at March 31, 2017. Changes versus year-end primarily reflected updated deposit-duration assumptions and the yield curve.
  • Credit risk is concentrated in real-estate lending, with a substantial portion of mortgage loans in the Louisville, Kentucky metropolitan area. Management warns that economic or collateral deterioration could require additional loan-loss provisions; actual losses may exceed estimates.
  • Available-for-sale securities had $3.882 million of gross unrealized losses. Management attributed these mainly to interest rates and did not consider them other-than-temporary, while noting that further market or economic deterioration could adversely affect credit quality.
  • The expected-credit-loss accounting standard (CECL) was not yet effective; management was assessing its impact and expected a one-time cumulative adjustment to the allowance when adopted.
  • The Company reported no material legal proceedings, no material changes to previously disclosed risk factors, and no off-balance-sheet transactions during the quarter reasonably likely to materially affect its financial condition, results, or cash flows. Ordinary-course loan commitments and letters of credit remain.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether the increase in nonperforming loans and foreclosed-property losses continues, and how collateral values and allowance assumptions evolve.
  • Whether loan growth and deposit mix sustain net interest income as the spread narrows and acquired-loan accretion declines.
  • The level and composition of classified loans, including the increase in doubtful balances, and the effect on future provisions and charge-offs.
  • How rate movements, deposit behavior, and the assumptions underlying the company’s interest-rate models affect earnings and economic value.
  • The eventual CECL adoption impact, including the size of any opening allowance adjustment.