FIDELITY D & D BANCORP INC quarterly report, Q2 FY2014

Fidelity D & D Bancorp, Inc. — 2014 Q2 Form 10-Q

Business context and period. Pennsylvania community bank holding company serving Lackawanna and Luzerne Counties through its subsidiary, The Fidelity Deposit and Discount Bank. This unaudited filing covers the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014; balance-sheet comparisons are with December 31, 2013. Dollar amounts below are in millions unless noted.

Financial results and condition

MetricQ2 2014Q2 2013Six months 2014Six months 2013
Net interest income$5.424$5.180$10.719$10.413
Provision for loan losses$0.300$0.600$0.600$1.150
Other income$1.821$2.051$3.559$4.119
Other expenses$4.761$4.606$9.546$9.487
Net income$1.627$1.513$3.083$2.907
Diluted EPS$0.67$0.64$1.28$1.24
  • Net income rose 8% in Q2 and 6% year to date. Management attributed the gains primarily to higher net interest income and lower loan-loss provisions, partly offset by reduced non-interest income and higher expenses.
  • Q2 net interest margin and spread, on a fully taxable-equivalent basis, were 3.79% and 3.62%, respectively, each down 5 basis points year over year. Cost of funds was 0.50%, down 4 basis points. Reported ROA was 1.01% for Q2 and 0.96% for the first half; ROE was 9.47% and 9.14%, respectively.
  • At June 30, assets were $650.3, up 4% from year-end; net loans and leases were $486.5, deposits $538.5, and shareholders’ equity $69.9. Gross loans grew to $495.6 from $478.2, led by consumer lending and commercial real estate.
  • Cash and cash equivalents were $14.4. First-half cash flows were $3.6 provided by operations, $23.7 used in investing, and $21.4 provided by financing; cash increased $1.2.
  • Short-term borrowings rose to $21.9 from $8.6; long-term debt remained $16.0. Total deposits increased $8.8. Management reported $356.3 of identified liquidity sources, equal to 55% of assets, including cash, available-for-sale securities and loans held for sale, and borrowing capacity.
  • Allowance for loan losses was $9.0, or 1.82% of gross loans. Non-performing loans were $4.1, down 30% from year-end; non-performing assets were $7.0, or 1.08% of assets, versus $9.0 and 1.44% at year-end.

Material changes versus comparable periods

  • For the first half, net interest income increased $0.3, while other income fell $0.6, mainly as mortgage loan sale gains declined with lower refinance and origination activity. Loans sold were $14.4 versus $50.2 in the first half of 2013; gains on loan sales were $0.3 versus $0.9.
  • The first-half provision declined $0.6 year over year, and net charge-offs fell to $0.5 from $1.8. Non-accrual loans decreased to $4.1 from $5.7 at year-end; troubled debt restructurings declined to $1.7 from $2.0.
  • Net unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities, after tax, increased to $2.6 from $1.2 at year-end, contributing $1.3 to first-half other comprehensive income.
  • Operating cash flow was $3.6 versus $12.3 in the first half of 2013, while net cash used in investing was $23.7 versus $31.4. The filing cites loan growth and changes in mortgage loan origination and sale activity among the cash-flow drivers.

Outlook, commentary and risks

  • Management expected 2014 net interest income to stabilize or improve marginally as earning-asset growth offsets low rates; continued margin pressure was possible until longer-term rates rise. Management expected the federal funds rate to remain unchanged well into 2015.
  • The bank planned continued commercial and consumer loan growth, a diverse investment portfolio, and efforts to grow low-cost deposits. It expected C&I lending growth to be flat to nominal, continued consumer lending focus, moderate deposit growth, and anticipated public-deposit growth from negotiated contracts.
  • Management described the Northeastern Pennsylvania economy as lagging the national recovery, with persistent housing and real-estate weakness and regional unemployment of 6.9% at June 30. It said credit quality remained a principal consideration in growth decisions.
  • Interest-rate risk is significant: a modeled immediate 200-basis-point increase raised projected 12-month net interest income 4.9%, while a 200-basis-point decrease reduced it 2.5%. Economic value of equity was projected to decline 9.9% and 15.7%, respectively. These are model estimates dependent on assumptions.
  • Management identified risks including borrower repayment capacity, local economic and property-value conditions, allowance estimates, interest-rate and securities-market movements, deposit competition and runoff, regulatory and Basel III changes, litigation, and operational or natural-disaster disruptions. Basel III provisions were scheduled to begin phasing in for the company in 2015.
  • Management reported no identified impairment of investment securities at June 30, 2014, attributing unrealized losses to interest rates and market conditions rather than credit deterioration. It cautioned that rising rates could reduce securities values. A $1.0 million foreclosed commercial property was transferred to bank premises for potential future expansion.
  • The company said disclosure controls were effective, there were no material changes in internal control over financial reporting during the quarter, and no material litigation was pending. It reported no material changes to risk factors from its 2013 Form 10-K.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether loan growth, especially consumer and commercial real estate growth, is sustainable without weakening underwriting or asset quality.
  • Whether non-performing loans and charge-offs continue to improve, and whether the $9.0 million allowance remains adequate given local economic and collateral risks.
  • How increased short-term borrowings and seasonal public-deposit volatility affect funding costs and liquidity; confirm the availability and terms of stated borrowing capacity.
  • Whether net interest margin stabilizes as management expects, given rate sensitivity, deposit competition, and modeled interest-rate scenarios.
  • Whether lower mortgage originations and loan-sale gains persist, and how the investment portfolio responds to interest-rate changes.