FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS INC quarterly report, Q2 FY2018

Financial Institutions, Inc. — Q2 2018 Form 10-Q

Business context and reporting period. The company is a New York-based financial holding company operating Five Star Bank, insurance agency SDN, and investment-advisory businesses Courier Capital and HNP Capital. This unaudited filing covers the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2018; balance-sheet comparisons are with December 31, 2017.

Key financial metrics

MetricQ2 2018Q2 2017Six months 2018Six months 2017
Net interest income$30.1 million$27.4 million$59.7 million$54.4 million
Provision for loan losses$40 thousand$3.8 million$3.0 million$6.6 million
Noninterest income$8.5 million$9.3 million$17.5 million$17.2 million
Noninterest expense$23.4 million$23.9 million$47.6 million$44.9 million
Net income$12.2 million$6.2 million$21.5 million$14.2 million
Diluted EPS$0.74$0.40$1.30$0.92
Tax-equivalent net interest margin3.17%3.18%3.18%3.20%
  • Q2 return on average common equity was 12.90%, versus 7.38%; return on average assets was 1.18%, versus 0.65%. The six-month efficiency ratio was 60.99%, versus 61.66%.
  • At June 30, total assets were $4.19 billion, net loans $2.87 billion, deposits $3.26 billion, total borrowings $512.0 million, and shareholders’ equity $386.9 million. Cash and due from banks was $89.1 million.
  • Loans grew $165.2 million from year-end to $2.90 billion gross. Deposits rose $52.0 million. Total borrowings increased $26.6 million; short-term borrowings were $472.8 million and long-term borrowings $39.2 million.
  • For the first six months, operating cash flow was $30.3 million, investing cash outflow $111.1 million, financing cash inflow $70.7 million, and cash declined $10.1 million.
  • Regulatory capital ratios at June 30 included CET1 of 9.82%, Tier 1 risk-based capital of 10.37%, total risk-based capital of 12.66%, and Tier 1 leverage of 8.10%. Management said the company remained well-capitalized.

Material changes versus comparable periods

  • Q2 net income rose 95% year over year. Higher interest income, led by loan growth and improved loan yields, and a much lower loan-loss provision were key contributors.
  • Q2 taxable-equivalent net interest income increased $2.2 million. Average earning assets grew 8%, including average loans up $381.9 million, while the margin edged down one basis point. Funding costs rose: the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities increased to 0.90% from 0.56%.
  • Q2 noninterest income declined $0.8 million, primarily because Q2 2017 included a $1.2 million noncash gain from a contingent-consideration liability adjustment. Q2 2017 noninterest expense also included a $1.6 million noncash goodwill impairment charge; its absence helped reduce reported expense in 2018.
  • Six-month net charge-offs declined to $3.7 million from $4.4 million. Nonperforming assets fell to $10.0 million from $12.7 million at year-end; nonperforming loans were 0.34% of total loans versus 0.46%.
  • Accumulated other comprehensive loss widened to $20.3 million from $11.9 million, mainly reflecting increased unrealized losses on securities. Management attributed most securities losses to market interest-rate changes and reported no other-than-temporary impairment.

Outlook, commentary, risks, and unusual items

  • The filing gives no specific earnings, revenue, or margin guidance. Management described ongoing organic loan and deposit growth efforts; it also cited growth in investment advisory income from acquisitions and assets under management.
  • On June 1, 2018, the company acquired HNP Capital for $5.1 million cash. HNP had approximately $344 million in assets under management; the company recorded $2.6 million of goodwill and $2.5 million of other intangible assets. Management said the acquisition was not material to consolidated results.
  • Management cited lower historical net charge-offs, increased collateral values supporting impaired loans, and improved qualitative credit factors as reasons for the reduced provision. The allowance was $34.0 million, or 1.17% of total loans; management considered it adequate but noted estimates may change and regulators may require adjustments.
  • Liquidity sources included core deposits, borrowing facilities, and securities. The company reported approximately $648.9 million of secured FRB borrowing capacity, $145.0 million of unsecured federal funds lines (with $23.5 million drawn), and $125.9 million of unencumbered liquid securities. Immediate FHLB credit capacity was approximately $5.0 million.
  • Interest-rate sensitivity modeling described net interest income as relatively neutral. Estimated 12-month net interest income changes ranged from a $2.4 million decline under a 100-basis-point rate decrease to a $261 thousand increase under a 100-basis-point increase; larger increases produced estimated declines. These are scenario estimates, not forecasts.
  • Disclosed risks include credit losses, geographic and commercial-lending concentration, deposit withdrawals and funding costs, interest-rate exposure, regulatory and legal matters, cybersecurity, competition, and acquisition integration. The company reported no material legal-proceeding developments and no material subsequent events. Management concluded disclosure controls were effective and reported no material quarterly change in internal control over financial reporting.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether continued loan growth can sustain earnings as deposit and borrowing costs rise and net interest margin remains under pressure.
  • Credit quality and reserve adequacy, particularly commercial and indirect consumer exposures, nonperforming loans, charge-offs, and the $13.1 million of accruing substandard loans.
  • The trajectory of securities valuations and accumulated other comprehensive loss, including the effect of interest rates and any future liquidity-driven sales.
  • HNP Capital integration, realized growth in advisory revenue and assets under management, and the returns on acquisition-related goodwill and intangibles.
  • Liquidity and funding resilience given wholesale borrowings, seasonality in municipal deposits, and the disclosed contingent terms on certain derivatives.
  • The rate-shock table reports a $444 thousand estimated decline under a 300-basis-point increase but shows a positive 0.34% change; verify this apparent sign inconsistency in the filing.