Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. — Q2 2017 Form 10-Q
Reporting period: Quarter and six months ended June 30, 2017. Unaudited results; comparisons are with the same periods in 2016. Goodyear operates tire businesses in the Americas, Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA), and Asia Pacific.
Key financial results
| Metric | Q2 2017 | Q2 2016 | Six months 2017 | Six months 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net sales | $3.686bn | $3.879bn | $7.385bn | $7.570bn |
| Goodyear net income | $147m | $202m | $313m | $386m |
| Diluted EPS | $0.58 | $0.75 | $1.23 | $1.43 |
| Total segment operating income | $361m | $531m | $746m | $950m |
| Segment operating margin | 9.8% | 13.7% | 10.1% | 12.5% |
- Q2 gross margin was approximately 24.3%, versus 27.5% a year earlier; cost of goods sold was 75.7% of sales versus 72.5%.
- Q2 tire shipments fell 10.2% to 37.4 million units. Replacement volume declined 10.9%; original-equipment volume fell 8.3%.
- Q2 operating income declined in each region: Americas $213m (down 26.8%), EMEA $77m (down 48.0%), and Asia Pacific $71m (down 22.8%). EMEA’s sales fell 11.7%.
- Cash and cash equivalents were $903m at June 30, 2017, down from $1.132bn at year-end 2016. Unused credit availability was $2.440bn, down from $2.970bn. Current assets were $6.632bn and current liabilities $5.069bn.
- Six-month operating cash flow was negative $185m, versus negative $67m in 2016. Capital expenditures were $497m; operating cash flow less capital expenditures was negative $682m, versus negative $533m.
- Balance-sheet debt, capital leases, and notes payable/overdrafts totaled approximately $6.076bn at June 30, compared with $5.479bn at December 31, 2016. The filing reports 38% of debt at variable rates, averaging 4.78%.
Material changes and management commentary
- Management attributed weaker earnings primarily to higher raw-material costs and lower tire volumes. Q2 raw-material costs rose $166m year over year, partly offset by $127m of price and product-mix improvement; lower volume reduced segment income by $98m. Six-month comparisons show a $178m raw-material headwind, partly offset by $174m from price and mix, with lower volume reducing income by $132m.
- Management cited challenging industry conditions: raw-material volatility, increased price competition, and weaker demand, particularly for OE and consumer replacement tires in the United States and Europe. Cost savings were approximately $59m in Q2, including $23m from raw-material measures.
- Operating cash flow was pressured by $762m of working-capital use in the first half, including increased accounts receivable and inventories. Net financing cash inflow of $426m included $538m of net borrowings.
- In March, Goodyear issued $700m of 4.875% senior notes due 2027; in May it used the proceeds plus cash to redeem $700m of 7% notes due 2022, paying a $25m premium. Interest expense declined year over year, partly reflecting lower average debt and interest rates.
Outlook, contingencies and risks
- For 2017, management expected tire unit volume to decline approximately 3.5% versus 2016 and under-absorbed fixed overhead costs to be approximately $155m higher. Cost savings were expected to more than offset general inflation; foreign-currency translation was expected to be essentially neutral at then-current spot rates.
- Management expected full-year raw-material costs to be approximately 20% above 2016, excluding savings, and expected the increase to exceed price-and-mix improvement by approximately $175m. This estimate was subject to significant commodity-price volatility.
- Expected 2017 cash needs included $800m–$900m of capital expenditures, $340m–$365m of interest, approximately $225m of restructuring payments, approximately $100m of common dividends, and $50m–$75m of non-U.S. pension contributions. Working capital was expected to use approximately $150m. Management considered liquidity adequate for 2017 needs and debt maturities.
- Goodyear recorded $235m of rationalization liabilities at June 30, including $128m related to the Philippsburg, Germany plant closure; approximately $120m of that closure accrual was expected to be paid in the second half of 2017. The closure involved approximately 890 job reductions; about 600 associates were released in July.
- Approximately 850 former Amiens, France employees asserted wrongful-termination or other claims totaling €118m ($135m); Goodyear intends to defend the claims and said it could not estimate any eventual payment.
- Asbestos liabilities were recorded at $175m gross, with a $126m related insurance receivable; approximately 61,400 claims remained pending. The filing notes potential for material costs above reserves, with excess amounts not reasonably estimable. Workers’ compensation liabilities were $249m, and the reasonably possible excess over recorded amounts was estimated at approximately $30m.
- Other risks include variable-rate debt and borrowing-base availability, commodity and foreign-exchange exposures, access to capital, and restrictions on transfers of subsidiary funds. Goodyear reported compliance with applicable material covenants at June 30.
Most important facts for investors to verify
- Whether tire volumes and demand stabilize, particularly in EMEA and the Americas, and whether price and mix can offset raw-material inflation.
- Whether the 2017 raw-material, unit-volume, overhead, cash-flow, and capital-spending outlook remains achievable as commodity prices and market conditions change.
- How working-capital investment, debt levels, and available borrowing capacity evolve; also monitor the first-lien facility’s borrowing base and the October 2017 renewal of European securitization back-up liquidity commitments.
- Actual costs and timing of the Philippsburg closure and other restructuring actions, along with developments in Amiens labor claims, asbestos matters, and insurance recoveries.
- Whether the reported liquidity and covenant headroom remain adequate, including the availability of cash held in jurisdictions subject to transfer restrictions.