HANMI FINANCIAL CORP quarterly report, Q1 FY2018

Hanmi Financial Corporation — Q1 2018 Form 10-Q

Business context and period: Hanmi Financial is a bank holding company whose subsidiary, Hanmi Bank, conducts traditional banking, including deposit-taking and lending. This unaudited report covers the three months ended March 31, 2018; balance-sheet comparisons are primarily with December 31, 2017.

Financial performance and condition

MetricQ1 2018 / March 31, 2018Comparable period / prior date
Net income; diluted EPS$14.9 million; $0.46Q1 2017: $13.8 million; $0.43
Net interest income before provision$44.9 millionQ1 2017: $42.4 million
Net interest margin, taxable-equivalent3.70%Q1 2017: 3.89%
Noninterest income / expense$6.1 million / $29.8 millionQ1 2017: $7.2 million / $27.2 million
Provision for loan and lease losses$649,000 expenseQ1 2017: $80,000 provision credit
Effective tax rate27.8%Q1 2017: 38.5%
Total assets$5.306 billionDecember 31, 2017: $5.210 billion
Loans and leases, gross$4.414 billionDecember 31, 2017: $4.304 billion
Deposits$4.378 billionDecember 31, 2017: $4.349 billion
Cash and due from banks$151.6 millionDecember 31, 2017: $153.8 million
FHLB borrowings / subordinated debentures$220.0 million / $117.4 millionDecember 31, 2017: $150.0 million / $117.3 million
Stockholders’ equity$564.3 millionDecember 31, 2017: $562.5 million

Operating cash flow was $18.4 million, investing cash outflow was $112.4 million, and financing cash inflow was $91.8 million. Cash and cash equivalents decreased $2.2 million during the quarter.

Return on average assets was 1.16% (1.18% in Q1 2017); return on average equity was 10.65% (10.46%). The efficiency ratio increased to 58.36% from 54.95%. Tangible book value per share was $16.98, versus $16.26 a year earlier.

Material changes and management commentary

  • Net income rose 7.8% year over year. Higher net interest income and lower income tax expense more than offset reduced noninterest income and increased operating expenses.
  • Average loans and leases grew 11.0% year over year to $4.31 billion, primarily from new production. Period-end gross loans and leases rose 2.5% from year-end; deposits increased 0.7%.
  • Interest expense increased 69.4% year over year, reflecting higher deposit costs and subordinated debt. Average cost of interest-bearing liabilities rose to 1.25% from 0.82%; the net interest spread narrowed to 3.28% from 3.62%.
  • Noninterest income declined 16.0%, mainly reflecting a $428,000 net loss on securities sales in Q1 2018 versus a $269,000 gain in Q1 2017; 2017 also included $0.4 million of upcharge income. Noninterest expense increased 9.2%, primarily due to salaries and benefits and professional fees.
  • Available-for-sale securities had a net unrealized loss of $11.5 million at March 31, versus $3.2 million at year-end. The quarter’s other comprehensive loss was $6.3 million, largely reflecting market-value declines. Management said it did not intend, and was not more likely than not required, to sell securities before recovery; it recorded no impairment charge.

Credit, liquidity, capital, and risks

  • Nonperforming loans and leases were $15.4 million, or 0.35% of loans and leases, versus $15.8 million and 0.37% at year-end. Nonperforming assets were $17.0 million, including $1.7 million of other real estate owned. Delinquent loans 30–89 days past due were $11.9 million, up from $11.2 million.
  • The allowance for loan and lease losses was $31.8 million, 0.72% of loans and leases, and 206.85% of nonperforming loans and leases. Q1 charge-offs of $1.6 million were offset by $1.7 million of recoveries. Management considered the allowance adequate, while noting estimates are uncertain and depend on economic and borrower conditions.
  • The portfolio is concentrated in commercial real estate: lessors of nonresidential buildings represented 29.9% of loans and leases and hospitality 16.9%. These concentrations expose the bank to property, borrower, and regional economic risks.
  • The Bank was well capitalized: total risk-based capital was 15.13%, common equity Tier 1 was 14.39%, and Tier 1 leverage was 12.51%. Available FHLB borrowing capacity was $651 million; the Bank also reported $95 million in unused unsecured federal funds lines and $8 million available at the Federal Reserve Discount Window. Brokered deposits were $145.2 million.
  • Undisbursed loan commitments, standby letters of credit, and commercial letters of credit totaled $358.4 million. These off-balance-sheet commitments carry credit risk and may require funding.
  • Interest-rate simulations showed a potential 2.18% decline in net interest income over 1–12 months under a 100-basis-point decrease, and a 0.11% decline under a 100-basis-point increase. Management cautioned that simulations depend on assumptions and are not forecasts.

Outlook, unusual items, and other disclosures

The filing provides no specific earnings or growth guidance. Management described forward-looking risks including interest-rate and spread changes, credit quality and allowance adequacy, competition for loans and deposits, economic and real-estate conditions, regulatory developments, and the ability to control expenses. Management reported no material change in previously disclosed risk factors, no material subsequent events, and no material change in internal control over financial reporting; disclosure controls were considered effective.

The company adopted accounting standards on financial instruments, tax effects in accumulated other comprehensive income, and revenue recognition. Revenue-standard adoption did not change the recognition method for the affected revenue streams or require an opening retained-earnings adjustment. The Tax Act’s accounting remained provisional under the applicable measurement period; no estimate adjustment was made in Q1.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether loan growth and deposit mix can support earnings as funding costs rise and the net interest margin compresses.
  • Trends in criticized and nonperforming credits, particularly hospitality and commercial real estate, and whether the allowance remains adequate.
  • Whether unrealized securities losses recover, and the potential effect of further interest-rate movements on earnings, liquidity, and equity.
  • Reliance on FHLB and other funding, growth in higher-cost time deposits, and the funding needs of outstanding commitments.
  • How the efficiency ratio and expense growth evolve, and whether the lower effective tax rate is sustainable.