El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. quarterly report, Q2 FY2017

Business context and reporting period

El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. filed this unaudited Form 10-Q for the 13 weeks ended June 28, 2017; comparable quarter ended June 29, 2016. Year-to-date figures cover 26 weeks. The company develops, operates and franchises El Pollo Loco restaurants. At quarter-end it had 208 company-operated and 264 franchised locations.

Financial performance

Amounts below are in millions of dollars except per-share data and percentages.

MetricQ2 2017Q2 201626 weeks 201726 weeks 2016
Total revenue$105.6$97.5$205.3$191.8
Operating income$12.7$13.4$22.1$23.7
Net income$7.8$7.3$12.7$12.7
Diluted EPS$0.20$0.19$0.32$0.33
Operating margin12.1%13.7%10.8%12.4%
  • Quarterly revenue grew 8.3%; company-operated restaurant revenue rose 8.8% and franchise revenue 1.4%. Year-to-date revenue grew 7.0%.
  • System-wide comparable sales increased 2.9% in Q2 and 1.3% year to date. Company-operated comparables rose 2.4% in Q2, with transactions up 0.5% and average check up 1.9%; year-to-date they rose 1.1%, as a 1.9% average-check increase was partly offset by a 0.8% transaction decline.
  • Restaurant contribution margin, a company-defined non-GAAP measure, was 21.8% in Q2 versus 22.0%; year to date it was 21.1% versus 21.3%. Food and paper cost rates improved, but labor, occupancy and other operating cost rates increased year to date.
  • Q2 net income rose 7.6%, while year-to-date net income was essentially flat. Lower tax expense helped quarterly earnings; operating income declined in both comparison periods.

Cash flow, debt and liquidity

  • For the first 26 weeks, operating cash flow was $30.7 million, up from $21.0 million; capital expenditures were $19.0 million, versus $14.3 million. Investing cash use was $19.0 million and financing cash use was $9.5 million. Cash increased $2.2 million to $4.4 million.
  • Revolver borrowings were $94.5 million at June 28, 2017; available revolver capacity was approximately $97.4 million, with $8.1 million of letters of credit outstanding. Total debt including capital leases was $94.9 million. The company reported covenant compliance.
  • Management said cash, operating cash flow and available revolver borrowings should cover liquidity needs for at least 12 months. The company made a further $4.0 million revolver prepayment after quarter-end.
  • Operating lease obligations were $307.2 million. The company expects the lease accounting standard to add right-of-use assets and lease liabilities, materially increasing balance-sheet amounts upon adoption, without an expected change to lease-expense recognition.

Outlook, changes and notable items

  • For 2017, management planned 17–19 new company-operated restaurants and 9–11 franchised restaurants; 9 and 5, respectively, had opened year to date. Long-term unit growth objective is 8%–10% annually.
  • Expected 2017 capital expenditures were $42–$44 million: $29–$31 million for new restaurants, $7 million for remodeling and $6 million for maintenance and corporate needs.
  • After quarter-end, the company decided to close three Texas restaurants. It was assessing its plans; impairment charges of up to $3.4 million related to two restaurants’ remaining assets could be recorded in Q3. Separately, it recorded $0.4 million of impairment and $0.9 million of closed-store reserves during the first half.
  • Management is monitoring its Texas portfolio; the carrying value of company-operated Texas restaurants was $28.4 million. It warned that unsuccessful profitability improvements could lead to significant future impairment.
  • Q2 included a $0.5 million insurance recovery of prior securities-litigation legal expenses. The prior-year comparison included a $0.9 million fire-insurance recovery. These unusual items affect comparability.
  • The company introduced its Loco Rewards points program in Q2; related deferred revenue was not material at quarter-end.

Risks, contingencies and governance

  • Pending matters include California wage-and-hour litigation, a federal securities class action and Delaware shareholder derivative actions. Damages sought were unspecified; the company stated it intends to defend the securities claims. The SEC closed its earlier inquiry in July 2016.
  • The CEO had announced plans to retire on or before December 31, 2017, subject to hiring a successor. The succession process could disrupt operations or strategy.
  • After a director resignation, only four of eight directors qualified as independent. The company was relying on Nasdaq’s cure period, expected to run through September 25, 2017; failure to regain compliance could lead to delisting risk.
  • Previously identified material weaknesses in financial-reporting controls were being remediated but were not yet considered fully remediated. Management concluded disclosure controls were effective at quarter-end.
  • Revenue is geographically concentrated: greater Los Angeles-area restaurants generated approximately 73% of revenue in the reported periods. The largest supplier accounted for 32% of first-half purchases. Other stated exposures include minimum-wage and labor-cost increases, volatile food commodities, floating interest rates, restaurant competition and payment-data security.

Important facts for investors to verify

  1. Whether Texas restaurant performance improves and whether the possible Q3 impairment or planned closures materially affect results.
  2. Progress on CEO succession and Nasdaq board-independence compliance before the stated cure-period deadline.
  3. Developments in wage-and-hour, securities and derivative litigation, including any financial exposure or settlement.
  4. Delivery of the 2017 restaurant-opening and $42–$44 million capital-spending plans, and the resulting effect on cash flow and revolver borrowings.
  5. Whether comparable-sales growth and restaurant margins can offset labor, occupancy, other operating-cost pressures and continued geographic and supplier concentration.