MIDDLESEX WATER CO annual report, FY2015

Middlesex Water Company — 2015 Form 10-K

Reporting period: Fiscal year ended December 31, 2015. This is an annual filing; the filing also provides unaudited fourth-quarter results. Amounts below are in U.S. dollars.

Business context

Middlesex provides regulated water and wastewater services in New Jersey, Delaware and Pennsylvania, alongside contract operations and other non-regulated services. The regulated segment generated about 88% of 2015 revenue and 94% of net income. Demand is seasonal, generally strongest in warmer months, and results depend materially on utility commission rate decisions, weather, customer growth and cost control.

Financial performance and liquidity

Metric20152014
Operating revenue$126.0 million$117.1 million
Operating income$35.8 million$34.4 million
Net income$20.0 million$18.4 million
Basic / diluted EPS$1.23 / $1.22$1.14 / $1.13
Operating margin28.4%29.4%
Net margin15.9%15.7%
Cash from operating activities$51.2 million$32.6 million
Utility plant expenditures$25.8 million$22.6 million
Common dividends per share$0.776$0.763

Revenue increased 7.6% year over year, while operating income rose 4.2% and net income 8.6%. Operations and maintenance expense increased $6.0 million, chiefly from employee benefit costs; total operating expenses rose about 9.0%, contributing to lower operating margin. Revenue gains reflected Middlesex rate increases and stronger weather-related demand, higher Tidewater demand and the Dover Air Force Base system, and scheduled Perth Amboy contract fee increases.

Operating cash flow increased by $18.6 million, substantially reflecting a net federal tax refund related to the company’s adoption of IRS tangible-property repair-cost regulations, as well as higher earnings and tax-payment timing. Management said operating cash funded all 2015 utility plant expenditures. Cash was $3.5 million at year-end; current assets of $24.4 million were below current liabilities of $28.3 million. The company had $60.0 million in credit lines, with $3.0 million drawn and $57.0 million available at year-end.

Long-term debt was $136.2 million on the balance sheet, excluding its $5.7 million current portion; notes payable were $3.0 million. The weighted-average rate on long-term debt was 3.87%. The company reported compliance with mortgage covenants. Estimated capital expenditures for 2016–2018 total $159.7 million, including $47.3 million planned for 2016.

Fourth-quarter 2015 revenue was $30.9 million versus $28.1 million in 2014; operating income was $8.5 million versus $8.1 million, and net income was $4.6 million versus $3.8 million.

Material changes and unusual items

  • A New Jersey rate settlement effective August 29, 2015 authorized $5.0 million in annual revenue increases, below the $9.5 million request. The settlement reset Middlesex’s distribution system improvement charge to zero.
  • Operating cash flow benefited from the IRS tangible-property repair-cost tax treatment. The company sought a $10.3 million federal refund, recorded a $2.3 million provision against refundable taxes because the deduction could be challenged, and said its 2014 federal return was selected for IRS examination. Management said the tax-regulation adoption was not expected to significantly affect the financial statements or effective tax rate.
  • Tidewater’s acquisition of the Dover Air Force Base water assets began contributing regulated service in October 2014; Tidewater revenues also benefited from higher customer demand.
  • Employee benefit expense increased $3.4 million in 2015, reflecting higher healthcare costs and retirement-plan costs, including the effects of a lower discount rate in the prior-year comparison and updated mortality assumptions.

Outlook, risks and contingencies

Management expected 2016 revenue to benefit from the full-year effect of Middlesex’s 2015 rate increase, Tidewater’s higher improvement-charge rate effective January 1, 2016, and pending Pinelands and Twin Lakes rate cases. It also expected a market-driven higher discount rate to lower employee benefit expense. The filing gives no quantified earnings or revenue guidance. Pinelands sought annual increases of approximately $0.3 million for water and $0.2 million for wastewater; Twin Lakes sought approximately $0.2 million. Decisions were expected in the third quarter of 2016, but approval and amounts were uncertain.

Principal risks include delayed, reduced or denied rate relief; continued weakness in commercial and industrial water demand; weather-driven usage variability; water availability or contamination; tighter water-quality and environmental requirements and related unrecovered costs; capital-market access and financing costs; benefit-plan assumptions and investment performance; competition for contracts and service territories; and cybersecurity or operational disruptions. The company also guarantees an unaffiliated operator’s performance at a Monmouth County leachate facility through 2028 unless replaced by an acceptable guarantor; it considered a payment under the guarantee unlikely and had recorded a liability of about $0.2 million. Management stated that ordinary-course litigation was not expected to have a material adverse effect.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Progress and final outcomes of the Pinelands and Twin Lakes rate cases, and whether 2016 revenue benefits match management’s expectations.
  • IRS examination outcome, the recoverability and timing of the requested refund and related tax benefits, and whether the $2.3 million provision proves sufficient.
  • Whether operating cash flow remains strong excluding tax-related cash-flow effects, and the funding mix and cost for the approximately $159.7 million 2016–2018 capital program.
  • Trends in commercial and industrial demand, weather-related consumption, and operating and employee-benefit costs.
  • Water-quality compliance, environmental capital requirements, and any changes in the status or exposure of the Monmouth County guarantee.