Northwest Bancshares, Inc. quarterly report, Q2 FY2012

Northwest Bancshares, Inc. — Q2 2012 Form 10-Q

Business context and reporting period. This unaudited quarterly filing covers the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, with comparisons to 2011. Northwest Bancshares is a savings and loan holding company operating Northwest Savings Bank, which had 167 community-banking offices across Pennsylvania, western New York, eastern Ohio and Maryland. Its reportable segments are Community Banking and Consumer Finance.

Financial performance and position

  • Q2 earnings: Net income was $16.4 million, up 9.1% from $15.0 million; diluted EPS was $0.17 versus $0.15. Pretax income rose to $23.9 million from $21.1 million.
  • First-half earnings: Net income was $31.5 million, down 2.2% from $32.3 million; diluted EPS increased to $0.33 from $0.31. Pretax income was $45.4 million versus $45.8 million.
  • Interest income and margins: Q2 net interest income was $66.0 million, down 1.1%; first-half net interest income was $131.4 million, down 1.8%. GAAP net interest margin was 3.55% for Q2 and the first half, compared with 3.53% and 3.54%, respectively, in 2011. Lower asset yields were partly offset by reduced funding costs.
  • Other income and expenses: Q2 noninterest income declined 2.8% to $14.8 million, while noninterest expense declined 1.0% to $52.0 million. For the first half, noninterest income fell 3.8% to $28.5 million and noninterest expense rose 1.3% to $103.2 million.
  • Cash flow: First-half operating cash flow was $61.2 million, versus $73.6 million in 2011. Investing activities used $65.2 million, compared with $26.1 million provided in the prior-year period; financing activities provided $37.6 million, compared with $105.4 million used. Cash and cash equivalents increased $33.6 million to $721.9 million.
  • Balance sheet and funding: Total assets were $8.038 billion, up 1.0% from year-end 2011. Gross loans were $5.670 billion, up 2.1%; deposits were $5.806 billion, up 0.4%. Borrowed funds totaled $853.1 million, up from $827.9 million. Shareholders’ equity was $1.169 billion.
  • Liquidity and capital: The bank’s liquidity ratio was 18.4%. Additional borrowing capacity included $1.919 billion at the FHLB, $188.5 million at the Federal Reserve Bank and $80.0 million at correspondent banks. Northwest Savings Bank’s total risk-based capital ratio was 20.20%, Tier 1 risk-based ratio 18.95%, and Tier 1 leverage ratio 12.29%; each exceeded the disclosed well-capitalized thresholds.
  • Credit quality: The allowance for loan losses was $70.1 million, or 1.24% of loans, versus $71.1 million, or 1.28%, at year-end. Nonaccrual loans fell to $117.3 million, or 2.07% of loans, from $131.1 million, or 2.36%. Nonperforming assets were $147.7 million, or 1.84% of assets, compared with $158.0 million, or 1.99%. Impaired loans increased to $193.8 million from $179.4 million.

Material changes versus comparable periods

  • Q2 net income improved mainly because loan-loss provision fell $3.4 million and noninterest expense fell $0.5 million; lower net interest and noninterest income and higher taxes partly offset those gains.
  • First-half net income declined despite a $4.3 million reduction in loan-loss provision, as lower net interest and noninterest income and higher expenses outweighed the provision benefit.
  • Loan growth was led by business banking, up 3.9% from year-end, and personal banking, up 1.3%. Deposit balances shifted from time deposits, down 11.0%, toward savings and transaction accounts.
  • Nonperforming loans and delinquency balances improved from year-end, while real estate owned rose to $30.5 million from $26.9 million.

Outlook, management commentary, risks and unusual items

  • The filing provides no specific earnings or financial guidance. Management said first-half results are not necessarily indicative of full-year results and did not anticipate a significant change in the effective tax rate during 2012.
  • Management attributed pressure on asset yields to low market rates, variable-rate loan repricing and competition. Its interest-rate simulation projected net income increases of 6.5%, 10.7% and 11.8% under immediate parallel rate increases of 1%, 2% and 3%, respectively, and a 5.3% decline under a 1% decrease. These are model estimates subject to uncertain assumptions.
  • Q2 provision expense benefited from upgrades of two commercial real estate loans, releasing $2.7 million of specific reserves. First-half securities impairment included $238,000 of credit-related impairment on a non-agency mortgage security. Management considered other disclosed securities losses temporary and noncredit-related.
  • Q2 marketing expense rose with campaign timing; first-half professional-services expense increased as consultants assisted consumer-compliance efforts. The Q2 effective tax rate was 31.5%, including a $250,000 prior-year state tax adjustment.
  • Key risks identified include interest-rate changes, loan and securities credit losses, economic conditions and collateral values, loan growth and underwriting, regulatory and deposit-insurance changes, competition, technology execution and liquidity. Management reported no material change to previously disclosed risk factors. It said ordinary-course claims were not expected to have a material adverse effect; disclosure controls were effective.
  • The company declared a $0.12-per-share dividend payable August 16, 2012. No shares were repurchased during the quarter; the disclosed repurchase plans remained available.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether the improvement in nonperforming loans and delinquencies continues, and whether the allowance remains adequate as business lending grows.
  • How low rates, deposit mix changes and asset repricing affect net interest margin and earnings.
  • Credit performance and valuation of impaired loans, real estate owned and securities with unrealized losses, particularly trust-preferred and non-agency mortgage securities.
  • Whether elevated marketing, processing and compliance-related spending persists, and how dividend payments compare with earnings and capital needs.
  • The assumptions behind the interest-rate simulation and the availability and terms of stated borrowing capacity.