PLUMAS BANCORP quarterly report, Q2 FY2016

Plumas Bancorp — Q2 2016 Form 10-Q

Reporting period: Quarter and six months ended June 30, 2016. Plumas Bancorp is a bank holding company whose subsidiary, Plumas Bank, serves small and middle-market businesses and individuals. The Bank operated branches in California and opened its first out-of-state branch in Reno, Nevada, in December 2015. Unless noted otherwise, amounts below are in millions.

Financial performance and condition

MetricQ2 2016Q2 2015Six months 2016Six months 2015
Net interest income, before loan-loss provision$5.830$5.317$11.568$10.294
Provision for loan losses$0.200$0.300$0.400$0.600
Non-interest income$2.055$1.822$3.707$3.867
Non-interest expense$4.680$4.629$9.313$9.335
Pre-tax income$3.005$2.210$5.562$4.226
Net income$1.837$1.355$3.410$2.570
Diluted earnings per share$0.36$0.27$0.67$0.51
Net interest margin4.26%4.26%4.23%4.16%
  • For the six months, management reported annualized return on average assets of 1.15%, versus 0.94% in 2015, and return on average equity of 15.3%, versus 13.5%.
  • At June 30, total assets were $604.0 million, loans net of allowance were $426.7 million, available-for-sale securities were $99.4 million, and deposits were $534.6 million. Compared with December 31, 2015, net loans increased $29.8 million, deposits increased $7.3 million, and total assets increased $4.8 million.
  • Six-month operating cash flow was $4.6 million, investing cash flow was negative $32.4 million, and financing cash flow was positive $0.6 million. Cash and cash equivalents fell $27.2 million to $41.0 million.
  • Shareholders’ equity was $46.4 million, up $3.9 million from year-end. Bank regulatory capital ratios at June 30 included a 12.0% common equity Tier 1 ratio, 9.5% Tier 1 leverage ratio, and 13.3% total risk-based capital ratio; management stated the Bank met capital requirements.
  • Outstanding debt included a $2.625 million term loan and $10.310 million of junior subordinated debentures. Repurchase agreements were $3.894 million. The term loan balance declined $2.250 million during the half-year; the company also repurchased part of a warrant for $0.862 million.

Changes and management commentary

  • Six-month net income rose $0.840 million year over year. Management attributed the improvement principally to $1.3 million higher net interest income, lower loan-loss provision, and slightly lower non-interest expense; lower non-interest income and higher income taxes partly offset the gains.
  • Loan growth was led by commercial real estate and agricultural lending. Commercial real estate represented 47.4% of gross loans; real estate-related lending, including agricultural loans secured by real estate, represented about 72%. The loan portfolio was 73% variable-rate, and 43% of variable-rate loans were at their rate floors.
  • Nonperforming loans declined to $3.0 million from $4.5 million at year-end; nonperforming assets were $5.8 million, or 0.96% of assets, versus $6.3 million, or 1.06%. The allowance for loan losses was $6.430 million, or 1.49% of gross loans. Net charge-offs were $48,000 for the half-year.
  • Other real estate owned increased to $2.817 million from $1.756 million. The company reported three OREO additions totaling $1.166 million and two dispositions totaling $96,000 during the first half.
  • Management cited loan volume as the main driver of higher interest income. Six-month net interest margin improved 7 basis points, while Q2 margin was unchanged year over year. Management noted competitive loan pricing and low deposit rates; growth in savings balances continued.
  • Non-interest income for the half-year decreased $160,000, including lower gains on SBA loan sales and a $32,000 loss on investment-security sales. Q2 non-interest income increased, primarily because of higher SBA loan-sale gains. The 2015 comparison included a one-time FHLB special dividend.

Liquidity, outlook, risks, and contingencies

  • Management said available funding sources were adequate for foreseeable operations. These include deposits, cash, securities, FHLB borrowing capacity, and unsecured correspondent-bank lines. Based on FHLB stock held, borrowing capacity was up to $90.3 million; additional stock would be needed to access the full $161 million facility. No FHLB or correspondent-line borrowings were outstanding at quarter-end.
  • Unfunded loan commitments were $87.925 million and standby letters of credit were $625,000 at June 30. Commitments are not necessarily expected to be fully drawn. The filing identifies $10.775 million of construction commitments expected to fund within twelve months.
  • Management reported no material change in the principal risk factors from the 2015 Form 10-K. Risks include competition, interest-rate and margin changes, economic and credit conditions, regulatory changes, real-estate markets, operational failures or fraud, and regional catastrophes. The company’s lending and operations are concentrated in northeastern California and northwestern Nevada.
  • Management considered the allowance adequate but cautioned that estimates are judgmental and future charge-offs could exceed the allowance. The filing also describes real-estate construction and land-development loans as higher risk. Four securities were in an unrealized-loss position; management attributed losses principally to market rates and said it did not intend to sell them or expect to be required to sell before recovery.
  • Ordinary-course legal claims were not expected by management to have a material adverse effect. No material changes to risk factors or internal controls were reported. The filing provides no earnings or other financial guidance; interim results may not indicate future performance.
  • The company was evaluating new accounting standards, including expected-credit-loss guidance (CECL), which was described as effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2019.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether strong loan growth can continue without weakening underwriting, credit quality, or capital ratios, particularly in commercial real estate and agricultural lending.
  • Trends in nonperforming loans, impaired loans, OREO, charge-offs, and allowance coverage; note that OREO rose despite lower nonperforming loans.
  • How lower cash balances and the $32.4 million investing cash outflow relate to loan growth, and whether deposit growth and available borrowing capacity remain sufficient.
  • The sustainability of net interest margin and earnings, including exposure to rate floors, deposit pricing, SBA loan-sale gains, and variable-rate junior subordinated debt.
  • The terms and remaining balance of the warrant after the $0.862 million repurchase, and the company’s future capital and dividend plans.