PLUMAS BANCORP quarterly report, Q2 FY2012

Plumas Bancorp — Q2 2012 Form 10-Q

Business context and reporting period. Plumas Bancorp is a California bank holding company whose subsidiary, Plumas Bank, operates 11 branches in California and focuses on lending to local businesses and individuals. This unaudited filing covers the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2012; balance-sheet comparisons are with December 31, 2011. Unless otherwise noted, amounts are in millions.

Financial performance and condition

  • Quarter earnings: Net income was $633,000 versus $101,000 in Q2 2011. Income available to common shareholders was $462,000, or $0.10 per share, compared with a $70,000 loss, or $(0.01) per share.
  • First-half earnings: Net income was $857,000 versus $325,000 in the first half of 2011. Common-shareholder income was $515,000, or $0.11 per share, versus a $17,000 loss, or $0.00 per share.
  • Interest income and margin: First-half net interest income before loan-loss provision was $8.392 million, up $22,000 year over year; net interest margin was 4.19%, versus 4.06%. Q2 net interest income was $4.284 million, up $95,000; margin was 4.30%, versus 4.12%.
  • Other income and expenses: First-half non-interest income fell $999,000 to $3.015 million, mainly from lower gains on sales of government-guaranteed loans and securities. Non-interest expense decreased $616,000 to $9.131 million. The $900,000 first-half loan-loss provision compared with $2.3 million in 2011.
  • Assets and funding: Total assets were $455.8 million, broadly unchanged from year-end. Net loans rose to $301.0 million from $287.4 million, and available-for-sale securities increased to $74.5 million from $57.9 million. Deposits increased to $394.8 million from $391.1 million; repurchase agreements declined to $3.8 million from $8.3 million.
  • Cash flow and liquidity: Cash and cash equivalents fell $28.0 million to $35.1 million during the first half. Operating activities provided $2.7 million; investing activities used $29.9 million; financing activities used $0.8 million. Management said available funding sources were adequate for foreseeable operations. The Bank had no FHLB advances outstanding and reported an unsecured $6 million Federal Funds line; its stated FHLB borrowing capacity was $41.5 million at existing stock levels, or up to $87.5 million if it purchased additional stock.
  • Capital and debt: Shareholders’ equity was $40.6 million. At June 30, the Bank’s Tier 1 leverage, Tier 1 risk-based and total risk-based capital ratios were 10.5%, 13.7% and 15.0%, respectively. Junior subordinated debentures were $10.3 million. The filing reports deferred Series A preferred dividends of $1.5 million and deferred trust-preferred-related interest payments of $740,000, each representing nine quarterly payments.

Material changes and asset quality

  • Management attributed the first-half earnings improvement primarily to the $1.4 million reduction in loan-loss provision and lower expenses; lower loan and securities sale gains partly offset these benefits. First-half return on average assets was 0.38%, versus 0.14% in 2011.
  • Nonaccrual loans declined to $12.9 million from $16.8 million at year-end. Impaired loans declined to $20.6 million from $24.4 million, and total substandard loans fell to $20.5 million from $29.2 million. Net charge-offs were $1.625 million for the first half; the allowance was $6.183 million, or 2.02% of total loans.
  • Other real estate owned and vehicles acquired through foreclosure totaled $7.75 million, down from $8.68 million. The Bank recorded a $493,000 first-half OREO valuation provision, reflecting appraisals on eight properties. Nonperforming assets were 4.54% of total assets, down from 5.60% at year-end.
  • Loans grew overall, including commercial real estate and construction and land-development lending. Management identified construction and land-development loans as higher risk. Real-estate-related lending accounted for 78% of the loan portfolio; approximately 74% of loans had variable rates.

Outlook, regulatory matters and risks

  • No specific earnings or financial guidance was provided. Management noted that interim results may not indicate future performance and described expected savings from outsourcing statement processing.
  • The FDIC and California regulator terminated the Bank’s formal Consent Order in February 2012. An informal agreement nevertheless requests a Tier 1 leverage ratio of at least 9% and continued reduction of classified assets; the classified-assets measure was 47% at June 30, down from 68% at year-end, and the Bank’s leverage ratio was 10.5%.
  • A Federal Reserve written agreement with the holding company remains in place. It requires prior written approval for specified dividends and distributions, payments on subordinated debentures or trust-preferred securities, new debt, and stock purchases or redemptions. The company also must submit annual cash-flow plans.
  • Preferred dividends are cumulative. The filing states that after six quarters without payment, holders may appoint representatives to the Board; nine quarterly payments were in arrears, and holders had not appointed representatives as of the filing. The company said no common cash dividend was anticipated in 2012.
  • Management cited risks including regional economic and real-estate conditions, credit deterioration, interest-rate and competitive pressures, regulatory changes, operational failures or fraud, securities-market changes, and regional catastrophes. Proposed Basel III capital rules were pending; management believed the company and Bank would comply if the proposals were then in effect.
  • Loan commitments were $76.2 million and standby letters of credit were $110,000. Management said many commitments may expire unused. Ordinary-course legal proceedings were not expected to have a material adverse effect.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether credit quality continues to improve, particularly nonaccrual, substandard and construction-related exposures, and whether the $6.183 million allowance remains adequate.
  • Whether OREO appraisals, additional valuation provisions, or property sales materially affect future results.
  • How sustainable earnings are given lower securities and guaranteed-loan sale gains, changing interest rates, and the contribution from reduced provisions and expenses.
  • Whether the Bank maintains the informal-agreement capital and classified-asset targets, and whether the Federal Reserve agreement continues to constrain holding-company actions.
  • The status and terms of accumulated preferred-dividend and subordinated-debt interest arrears, including any consequences under the governing agreements.
  • Liquidity trends following the $28.0 million first-half cash decline, planned loan growth, and the availability of contingent borrowing capacity.