REGENCY CENTERS CORP quarterly report, Q2 FY2012

Regency Centers Corporation / Regency Centers, L.P. — Q2 2012 Form 10-Q

Reporting period: Quarter and six months ended June 30, 2012; dollar amounts below are in millions unless noted. Regency is a REIT focused primarily on grocery-anchored shopping centers. At quarter-end, it directly owned 217 centers and held interests in 147 additional centers through joint ventures. Consolidated operating centers were 93.7% leased, versus 91.7% a year earlier. The Parent Company and Operating Partnership report substantially the same assets, liabilities, and operating results.

Financial performance

MetricQ2 2012Q2 2011Six months 2012Six months 2011
Revenue$129.8$124.6$256.5$248.3
Net income$11.3$18.9$38.1$27.1
Net income attributable to common shareholders$5.7$12.9$18.9$15.0
Diluted earnings per share$0.06$0.14$0.21$0.17
Cash provided by operating activitiesNot separately presentedNot separately presented$111.3$101.7
  • Q2 revenue rose 4.1%; first-half revenue rose 3.3%. Minimum rent grew with higher occupancy, rent per square foot, and acquisitions. Fee revenue fell, principally because the prior-year period included a $5.0 million transaction fee.
  • Q2 common earnings declined year over year, primarily due to a $23.5 million impairment charge. First-half common earnings and diluted EPS increased despite that charge, supported by higher revenue, lower interest expense, property-sale gains, and increased earnings from real estate partnerships.
  • Same-property NOI increased 3.4% in Q2 and 3.7% for the first half. The filing does not present a conventional consolidated profit-margin measure.
  • First-half operating cash flow increased $9.6 million. Investing cash use was $72.8 million, including $79.8 million for development and land; financing cash use was $26.8 million. Cash increased $11.6 million to $23.0 million.

Balance sheet, debt, and liquidity

  • Total assets were $4.03 billion at June 30, 2012, compared with $3.99 billion at year-end 2011. Net real estate investments were $3.73 billion.
  • Consolidated debt was $2.06 billion: $1.76 billion of notes payable and $305 million drawn on unsecured credit facilities. Debt was $1.98 billion at year-end 2011. Regency also reported its pro-rata share of joint-venture debt at approximately $582 million; those loans are described as non-recourse.
  • At quarter-end, the $600 million unsecured line had $155 million outstanding and the $250 million term loan had $150 million outstanding. Regency reported a 45.3% debt-to-asset ratio, including its pro-rata share of joint-venture debt and assets, and a 2.5x coverage ratio for the first half. It said it was in compliance with debt covenants.
  • Regency reported 79.4% of real estate assets as unencumbered. Cash was $23.0 million; the filing also reports $6.1 million of restricted cash.
  • Scheduled consolidated maturities include $185.5 million in 2014 and $557.1 million in 2015. The company repaid $192.4 million of 6.75% unsecured notes in January, using new borrowing; lower-cost debt contributed to lower interest expense.

Material changes, outlook, and risks

  • In February, Regency issued $241.4 million net of costs of 6.625% Series 6 preferred stock and redeemed its Series 3 and 4 preferred stock for $200 million. It also repurchased Series D preferred units for $48.1 million. The preferred-stock redemption resulted in a $7.0 million non-cash charge to common earnings.
  • Regency sold four operating properties in the first half for net proceeds of $39.2 million and recognized $8.6 million of net sale gains in discontinued operations. A separate 15-property portfolio sale to a Blackstone affiliate closed July 25 for $321 million. Regency retained a $47.5 million preferred equity investment with a 10.5% annual preferred return and no leasing or management role after closing.
  • After that closing, Regency used proceeds to repay the $150 million funded term-loan balance and $120 million on its unsecured line. It retained the option to draw the remaining $100 million under the term loan, with the option extended to January 11, 2013.
  • Management expected $417.7 million of dispositions and $187.1 million of acquisitions during the remainder of 2012, with proceeds also intended to repay $150 million of term debt. It estimated approximately $4.6 million of remaining-2012 funding needs, including $83.4 million of in-process development costs offset by disposition capital. These are management estimates, not earnings guidance.
  • The development program expanded: 11 projects were under construction or in lease-up at June 30, with estimated net development costs of $282.3 million and $144.2 million remaining to complete. Development spending and returns depend on leasing, construction schedules, tenant demand, and access to capital.
  • The Board declared a quarterly dividend of $0.4625 per share, payable August 29, 2012. The dividend had been unchanged since May 2009; future payments remain at the Board’s discretion and depend on capital needs and availability.
  • Key risks include tenant financial distress or lease rejection in bankruptcy, economic weakness affecting occupancy, rents and expense recoveries, difficulty completing property sales or refinancing, development execution, joint-venture funding needs, and environmental liabilities. Management reported no known litigation expected to materially harm financial position or results; it cautioned that environmental reviews may not reveal all potential liabilities. No material changes to the risk factors in the 2011 Form 10-K were reported.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether the completed 15-property transaction and the expected $417.7 million of dispositions occur on the reported terms, and the resulting impact on recurring rent, fees, and debt.
  • How the $23.5 million impairment, including the portfolio-related charge and other property impairments, affects reported earnings and the valuation assumptions behind the remaining properties.
  • Whether occupancy, rent growth, and same-property NOI continue to improve, and how much growth depends on joint ventures or nonrecurring property-sale gains.
  • Debt maturities, actual borrowing availability after letters of credit and other uses, covenant headroom, and refinancing needs at Regency and its joint ventures.
  • Development costs to complete, leasing and opening schedules, and the cash available for development, acquisitions, and the dividend.
  • Environmental exposures and any future tenant bankruptcies, lease terminations, or joint-venture capital calls.