SOUTHERN FIRST BANCSHARES INC quarterly report, Q2 FY2015

Southern First Bancshares, Inc. — Q2 2015 Form 10-Q

Business context and reporting period. The company is a South Carolina bank holding company whose subsidiary provides commercial, consumer and mortgage lending and deposit services. This unaudited filing covers the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2015; balance-sheet comparisons are with December 31, 2014.

Financial performance and condition

  • Q2 earnings: Net interest income was $9.5 million, up 17.6% year over year; provision for loan losses was $1.0 million. Noninterest income was $2.1 million, up 39.3%, while noninterest expense rose 5.2% to $6.6 million. Net income was $2.56 million versus $1.57 million; diluted EPS was $0.39 versus $0.26.
  • First-half earnings: Net interest income was $18.6 million, up 18.1%; provision was $1.6 million versus $2.0 million. Noninterest income was $4.3 million, up 71.1%, and noninterest expense was $14.1 million, up 16.7%. Net income was $4.59 million versus $2.82 million; diluted EPS was $0.70 versus $0.48.
  • Revenue and margins: Q2 interest income was $11.3 million and interest expense $1.8 million. Tax-equivalent net interest margin was 3.73%, compared with 3.66% in Q2 2014; net interest spread was 3.56%, versus 3.50%. Management attributed the margin improvement principally to lower funding costs and slightly higher earning-asset yields.
  • Key income and expense drivers: Loan and mortgage fee income reached $1.4 million in Q2, up $796,000, primarily reflecting expanded mortgage operations. Compensation expense increased 16.8% in Q2, including costs for 18 additional employees. The Q2 efficiency ratio improved to 57.3% from 65.9%.
  • Assets and lending: Total assets increased 8.7% from year-end to $1.119 billion. Gross loans grew $92.1 million to $963.5 million; net loans were $950.6 million. Loans were 81.7% real-estate-secured, and commercial loans represented 66.1% of the portfolio.
  • Credit quality: The allowance for loan losses was $12.9 million, or 1.34% of gross loans, versus $11.8 million and 1.35% at year-end. First-half net charge-offs were $450,000, or 0.10% of average loans annualized, compared with $1.06 million and 0.28% in first-half 2014. Nonperforming assets declined to $9.6 million, or 0.85% of assets, from $10.0 million, or 0.97%, at year-end. Loans 30 or more days past due increased to 0.97% of total loans from 0.73%.
  • Funding, debt and liquidity: Deposits rose $105.6 million to $894.5 million; FHLB advances and other borrowings declined $20.0 million to $115.2 million. The loan-to-deposit ratio was 108%. Cash and cash equivalents were $41.4 million, roughly unchanged from year-end. Available borrowing capacity included $115.4 million from the FHLB, $45.0 million in unused correspondent-bank lines and an unused $10 million line with another financial institution.
  • Cash flow and capital: First-half operating cash flow was $5.6 million, investing cash outflow $91.2 million and financing cash inflow $85.7 million; cash increased $146,000. Shareholders’ equity was $87.7 million. The Bank’s total capital ratio was 11.54%, and the holding company’s was 11.90%; both exceeded the stated well-capitalized threshold of 10.00% for the Bank. No cash dividends have been paid since inception.

Material changes, outlook and risks

  • Growth in loans and deposits drove higher average earning assets and net interest income. Mortgage expansion materially boosted fee income, while added staff and higher real estate-owned expenses contributed to expense growth.
  • Management said it did not anticipate significant further reductions in deposit or borrowing costs, which it described as historically low. The filing provides no earnings, revenue or loan-growth guidance and cautions that interim results are not necessarily indicative of full-year results.
  • Interest-rate sensitivity modeling estimated net interest income changes versus the base case of +4.26% for a 100-basis-point increase and -5.09% for a 100-basis-point decrease; larger modeled moves ranged from +15.89% at +300 basis points to -13.47% at -300 basis points. These are estimates based on assumptions, not forecasts.
  • Risks highlighted include credit deterioration and real-estate concentration, loan growth and seasoning, funding and deposit flows, competition, interest-rate changes and margin pressure, regulatory requirements, cybersecurity, and the adequacy of loan-loss reserves. Unfunded credit commitments were $181.4 million, mostly variable-rate; management expected a significant portion not to be funded.
  • Unusual items included a $737,000 first-half write-down of real estate owned, partly reflected in $855,000 of first-half OREO expenses. Management also attributed lower Q2 “other” expenses partly to litigation-related costs incurred in Q2 2014. Management reported no subsequent events requiring accrual or disclosure and no material pending legal proceeding known to it.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether rapid loan growth can be sustained without weakening underwriting or increasing delinquencies, nonperforming loans or charge-offs.
  • The adequacy of the $12.9 million allowance, especially given real-estate collateral concentration and the stated risks from loan growth and limited seasoning.
  • Deposit growth, the 108% loan-to-deposit ratio, wholesale-deposit maturities and continued access to borrowing facilities.
  • Whether mortgage-fee growth and improved efficiency persist as staffing and operating costs rise; assess the effect of lower market loan yields on margins.
  • Actual results versus the filing’s interest-rate sensitivity assumptions and the stated absence of formal financial guidance.