Seagate Technology Holdings Plc quarterly report, Q1 FY2014

Seagate Technology plc — Form 10-Q summary

Business and period: Seagate makes HDDs, SSHDs and SSDs for enterprise, client-compute and consumer applications, and provides storage services. This report covers the 13 weeks ended September 27, 2013, the first quarter of fiscal 2014; comparisons are with the prior-year quarter ended September 28, 2012 and, where shown, the quarter ended June 28, 2013. Dollar amounts are in millions unless stated otherwise.

Financial performance and position

MetricQuarter ended September 27, 2013Comparison and context
Revenue$3,489Down 6.5% year over year; up from $3,425 in the preceding quarter.
Shipments and average selling price56 million units; 49 exabytes; $62 per unitPrior-year shipments were 58 million units, 43 exabytes and $63 per unit.
Gross profit and margin$975; 28%Prior-year $1,061 and 28%; preceding quarter $939 and 27%.
Operating income and margin$478; 14%Prior-year $624 and 17%.
Net income and diluted EPS$427; $1.16Prior-year $582 and $1.42; net income declined about 27% year over year.
Operating cash flow$682Prior-year $1,132. The filing attributes part of current-quarter cash movement to a $115 decrease in accrued employee compensation, mainly performance-compensation payments.
Capital expenditures$161Cash used for property, equipment and leasehold improvements.
Cash and investments$2,413 cash and short-term investments; $108 restricted cash and investmentsCash and short-term investments were $2,188 at June 28, 2013.
Debt$2,773 total; $2,772 long-termNo revolving-credit borrowings; $2 utilized for letters of credit. Reported debt fair value was $2,938.
Dividend and repurchases$0.38 declared per share; $182 spent repurchasing about 4 million sharesThe board subsequently approved a $0.43-per-share dividend for November 26, 2013.

Changes, outlook and management commentary

  • Year-over-year revenue fell as unit shipments and average selling prices declined, partly offset by a more favorable product mix. Sequential revenue rose on higher unit shipments, partly offset by lower average selling prices.
  • Management described the pricing environment as stable and gross margin as consistent with both comparison periods. Product-development spending was $294, up from $268 a year earlier, reflecting investment in storage technologies and headcount. Marketing and administrative expense rose to $181 from $150, mainly due to core-business enhancements and headcount.
  • Other expense, net was $38, compared with $24 a year earlier; the prior-year quarter included a gain on strategic-investment sales. The much larger $145 expense in the preceding quarter primarily reflected losses on early debt redemption and repurchases.
  • Management expected fiscal 2014 capital expenditures to remain within its long-term target of 6%–8% of revenue. The filing provides no specific revenue or earnings guidance. Future dividends remain at the board’s discretion.
  • Liquidity sources included approximately $2.4 billion of cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments, operating cash generation, and a $500 million revolving facility. The company reported compliance with debt covenants and expected to remain compliant over the next 12 months.
  • After quarter-end, on October 21, 2013, Seagate repurchased 32.7 million shares from Samsung Electronics for $1.5 billion. This is a significant subsequent capital-allocation event not reflected in September 27 balances.

Risks, contingencies and unusual items

  • Management cited uncertainty in global demand, adverse disk-drive pricing, competition, possible excess industry supply, product qualification and manufacturing execution, and achieving restructuring cost savings as risks to results.
  • Seagate reported $163 million of unrecognized tax benefits; it expected a reduction of approximately $6 million over the following 12 months, primarily from statute expirations. The quarter’s $13 million tax provision included about $3 million of net discrete tax expense.
  • Material litigation included Convolve/MIT patent claims, a former employee’s claims seeking damages exceeding $75 million, LEAP’s claim seeking about $38 million, an ITC investigation involving Realtek, and Enova patent claims. The company disputed the claims and said it could not reasonably estimate possible losses for these matters.
  • Auction-rate securities with approximately $17 million par value remained unable to settle at auction; their estimated fair value was $15 million. Seagate considered the impairment temporary and did not expect to need to sell before recovery.
  • Warranty liabilities totaled $318 million, including $171 million current and $147 million long-term. Warranty costs on new shipments were 1.4% of revenue, versus 1.3% in each comparison quarter.
  • The company disclosed currency, interest-rate, investment and counterparty-credit exposures. It reported disclosure controls were effective and no material changes to internal control over financial reporting during the quarter.

Investor verification priorities

  • Assess whether shipment growth and product mix can offset lower average selling prices and year-over-year revenue declines.
  • Verify the cash-flow trend and the sustainability of working-capital movements, especially employee-compensation payments.
  • Reconcile the October Samsung share repurchase and subsequent dividend with liquidity, debt levels and future capital-allocation plans.
  • Review warranty accrual assumptions, the $163 million tax exposure, and developments in the disclosed litigation, for which loss ranges were not estimable.
  • Track competitive pricing, industry supply, product execution and the company’s progress against its 6%–8% capital-expenditure target.