Service Properties Trust quarterly report, Q2 FY2013

Service Properties Trust (then Hospitality Properties Trust) — Q2 2013 Form 10-Q

Reporting period: Three and six months ended June 30, 2013; unaudited. The filing was submitted under the name Hospitality Properties Trust. At quarter-end, the REIT owned 290 hotels and 185 travel centers, operated under 11 management or lease agreements.

Financial performance and position

MetricQ2 2013Q2 2012First six months 2013First six months 2012
Total revenue$412.3 million$343.2 million$766.8 million$644.6 million
Operating income$74.3 million$73.7 million$137.4 million$151.3 million
Net income$45.4 million$37.7 million$72.9 million$80.6 million
Net income available to common shareholders$37.3 million$27.0 million$56.7 million$55.8 million
Basic and diluted earnings per common share$0.27$0.22$0.43$0.45
Normalized FFO per share$0.78$0.75$1.52$1.53
  • Revenue mix and hotel trends: Q2 hotel operating revenue was $349.9 million, up 32.0%; rental income was $61.9 million, down 16.1%. For comparable hotels, Q2 ADR rose 1.8%, occupancy increased 3.8 percentage points to 76.9%, and RevPAR rose 7.1%. Reported hotel revenue growth was substantially affected by converting 53 hotels from leased to managed in January 2013.
  • Cash flow: First-half operating cash flow was $171.9 million, versus $180.4 million; investing cash outflow was $311.8 million, versus $301.8 million; financing cash inflow was $320.6 million, versus $137.8 million. Cash and equivalents ended June at $200.7 million, up from $20.0 million at year-end 2012.
  • Debt and liquidity: At June 30, revolving-credit borrowings were $90 million, the term loan was $400 million, and senior and convertible notes had carrying values of approximately $2.303 billion combined. The $750 million revolver had $660 million available; borrowings were $120 million and availability $630 million on August 6. The company reported covenant compliance.
  • Distributions: Common shareholders received $0.47 per share in February and May; a further $0.47 distribution was declared in July. Preferred distributions were also paid during the period.

Material changes versus the prior period

  • Q2 revenue growth primarily reflected the 53-hotel lease-to-management conversion, better hotel revenues and acquisitions. The conversion also shifted amounts from rental revenue to hotel revenue and added hotel operating costs; therefore, reported revenue growth does not by itself represent comparable-property growth.
  • Q2 operating income was nearly flat, while first-half operating income fell 9.2%. Higher depreciation, hotel expenses and interest expense contributed to the first-half decline.
  • Q2 net income included a $6.868 million tax benefit from restructuring certain taxable REIT subsidiaries. Excluding this item, reported net income growth would have been lower. First-half common earnings per share declined despite slightly higher common earnings, partly reflecting the March common-share issuance.
  • First-half hotel performance improved overall, but results varied: Sonesta and Wyndham comparable portfolio RevPAR declined 10.1% and 13.3%, respectively, while other major portfolios generally improved.

Outlook, risks and unusual items

  • Management expected hotel renovation activity to remain high through year-end 2013 and believed operating cash flow would cover operating costs, interest and declared distributions over the next 12 months. This was not a quantified earnings or FFO forecast.
  • Planned capital spending remained substantial: the filing described further 2013 funding for hotel renovations and rebranding, including approximately $19.2 million for Marriott No. 234, $63 million for InterContinental, approximately $79 million for Sonesta, and $75.6 million for Wyndham; it also expected about $35 million for travel-center improvements. Actual costs and operating returns were uncertain.
  • Hotel minimum-return shortfalls were significant: certain managed portfolios were $8.0 million below minimum returns in Q2 and $30.4 million below in the first half. Of these, $6.8 million and $21.6 million, respectively, were not funded by managers under the agreements. Guarantees and security deposits are limited, can be exhausted, and deposit applications do not provide new cash.
  • Eight of nine hotel operating agreements had trailing-12-month coverage below 1.0x; the hotel total was 0.82x. Travel-center lease coverage was 1.60x. The company cautioned that property-level coverage is not a complete measure of tenant or manager ability to pay.
  • TA, the largest tenant, had $150 million of deferred rent due in 2022 and 2024 that HPT had not recognized because collection was uncertain. TA also accounted for 37% of HPT’s real estate properties at cost.
  • HPT issued $300 million of 4.5% senior notes due 2023 and raised $393.5 million net from a common-share offering. It redeemed all 6.7 million Series C preferred shares on July 1 for $167.5 million plus accrued distributions and expected a $5.627 million third-quarter charge.
  • Acquisitions included a Duluth hotel for $29.7 million and the New Orleans hotel for $120.5 million. Subsequent to quarter-end, HPT acquired travel-center land for $6.3 million and a Florham Park hotel for $52.75 million. A proposed approximately $375 million NH Hoteles investment was abandoned after financing approvals were unavailable.
  • Key risks include tenant and manager payment shortfalls, hotel and travel-center industry weakness, renovation execution and returns, refinancing and interest-rate exposure, REIT qualification, and conflicts of interest involving RMR and related parties. The company has no employees and receives management services from RMR; the filing also describes related-party relationships with TA, Sonesta and AIC.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • How much of revenue and earnings growth reflects the accounting and operating-model change for the 53 converted hotels versus underlying comparable performance.
  • Whether hotel operating cash flows, coverage and guarantee availability improve, particularly for portfolios with unreimbursed minimum-return shortfalls.
  • TA’s ability to pay current and deferred rent, and the collectability and timing of the deferred amounts.
  • Actual renovation and acquisition spending, funding sources, and whether resulting property performance supports increased contractual minimum returns.
  • Liquidity after distributions, preferred-share redemption and planned capital spending, including future revolver usage and debt maturities.
  • The recurring earnings impact apart from the one-time tax benefit and impairment charge; also note that FFO and Normalized FFO are non-GAAP measures and are not substitutes for operating cash flow.