TRIMAS CORP quarterly report, Q1 FY2015

TriMas Corporation 2015 Q1 Form 10-Q Summary

Business context and reporting period

TriMas is a global manufacturer and distributor serving commercial, industrial and consumer markets through six segments: Packaging, Energy, Aerospace, Engineered Components, Cequent APEA and Cequent Americas. This unaudited report covers the three months ended March 31, 2015, with comparison to the three months ended March 31, 2014.

Management was pursuing a targeted mid-2015 tax-free spin-off of the Cequent businesses into Horizon Global Corporation, subject to board, regulatory, tax and registration conditions.

Key financial metrics

MetricQ1 2015Q1 2014Change
Net sales$366.5 million$365.4 millionUp 0.3%
Gross profit$98.2 million$95.9 millionUp $2.3 million
Gross margin26.8%26.3%Up 50 basis points
Operating profit$27.5 million$32.3 millionDown 14.8%
Operating margin7.5%8.8%Down 130 basis points
Net income attributable to TriMas$14.0 million$18.6 millionDown 24.7%
Diluted earnings per share$0.31$0.41Down $0.10
Cash used in operating activities$23.3 million$24.7 millionUse improved $1.4 million
Capital expenditures$8.0 million$9.0 millionDown $1.0 million

Interest expense increased to $4.7 million from $3.5 million, while other expense increased to $2.6 million from $1.0 million. The effective income tax rate was 31.0% in both periods.

At March 31, 2015, cash and cash equivalents were $23.7 million, compared with $24.4 million at December 31, 2014. Total debt was $671.5 million, including $580.0 million under the Credit Agreement and $91.5 million under the receivables facility and other arrangements. General-purpose borrowing capacity, after leverage restrictions, was $141.0 million, compared with $192.0 million at year-end 2014.

The company reported actual leverage of 2.90x against a 3.50x covenant limit and interest coverage of 12.95x against a 3.00x minimum. TriMas was in compliance with its debt covenants.

Material changes versus the prior comparable period

  • Sales were essentially flat because approximately $19.4 million of acquisition-related sales and organic growth were largely offset by lower oil-related demand and approximately $7.7 million of unfavorable currency effects.
  • Operating profit declined primarily because of $3.6 million of Cequent separation costs, Energy restructuring and footprint-consolidation inefficiencies, weaker Engineered Components results and higher corporate-level financing costs.
  • Aerospace sales increased 68.2% to $45.7 million, largely from the fourth-quarter 2014 acquisition of Allfast. Aerospace operating profit increased to $8.1 million from $4.9 million.
  • Energy sales declined 3.1% to $51.2 million, while operating profit fell to $0.3 million from $2.6 million because of lower demand, sourcing costs, port delays and restructuring inefficiencies.
  • Engineered Components sales declined 12.9% to $48.3 million, and operating profit declined to $6.0 million from $7.9 million, principally because lower oil prices reduced engine and related product demand.
  • Packaging sales declined 3.0% to $79.0 million, while operating profit declined to $17.5 million from $18.4 million. Cequent APEA sales declined 9.2%, primarily because of currency effects. Cequent Americas sales declined 2.3%, but operating profit increased modestly to $5.9 million.
  • Foreign currency translation reduced other comprehensive income by $6.5 million, compared with a $1.9 million gain in the prior-year quarter.
  • Operating cash flow remained negative because receivables increased by $29.1 million, inventories increased by $10.2 million and accounts payable and accrued liabilities decreased by $9.6 million.

Outlook, commentary, risks and unusual items

Management expected 2015 to present headwinds from lower oil prices, a stronger U.S. dollar and limited general economic growth. No specific revenue, earnings or cash-flow guidance was provided in the filing. Management expected productivity, footprint optimization, restructuring and product-portfolio actions to support future margin expansion.

  • The Cequent spin-off was targeted for mid-2015. One-time separation costs were expected to total approximately $30 million, with $3.6 million recorded in the first quarter.
  • Energy restructuring included facility closures, branch consolidation and the planned relocation of certain production from Houston to Mexico. Management stated that further actions might be required if demand and profitability remained weak.
  • Lower oil prices materially affected the Arrow Engine business and other energy-related demand. Currency volatility affected reported sales and profitability across international operations.
  • The company had variable-rate debt; management estimated that a 1 percentage-point increase in applicable interest rates would increase annual interest expense by approximately $5.2 million after considering the interest-rate swap.
  • TriMas was defending 1,074 pending asbestos cases involving 7,733 claimants. It reported approximately $7.4 million of cumulative settlement costs to date and stated that it did not expect the matters to have a material adverse effect, although future claims and periods of uninsured costs remain risks.
  • A competitor asserted a false-advertising claim and may seek more than $10 million; no formal demand had been made, and TriMas considered the potential demand unreasonable and without merit.
  • Forward-looking results remain subject to leverage, debt covenant, market demand, competitive, supply, raw-material, currency, litigation, regulatory, acquisition-integration and spin-off risks.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Progress, timing, tax treatment and total costs of the proposed Cequent spin-off.
  • Whether Energy and Engineered Components demand and margins recover amid lower oil prices.
  • Integration performance and expected synergies from the Allfast and Lion Holdings acquisitions.
  • Cash conversion, working-capital requirements and the reduction in general-purpose liquidity to $141.0 million.
  • Debt maturities, variable-rate exposure, covenant headroom and the October 2018 maturity of the principal Credit Agreement.
  • Future asbestos defense and settlement costs, insurance availability and developments in the false-advertising claim.
  • The filing’s statement that disclosure controls were effective and that no material changes occurred in internal control over financial reporting.