Amplify Energy Corp. annual report, FY2021

Amplify Energy Corp. (NYSE: AMPY) — 2021 Form 10-K

Business context and reporting period. This annual report covers the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021; it is not a standalone fourth-quarter report. Amplify is an independent oil and natural gas producer operating in Oklahoma, Wyoming, offshore Southern California (Beta), East Texas/North Louisiana, and the Eagle Ford. Its assets are managed as one reportable segment.

  • Year-end proved reserves were 121.2 MMBoe, 98% proved developed; fourth-quarter average net production was 20.8 MBoe/d.
  • Beta was shut in after the October 2, 2021 pipeline incident. No Beta operations were underway at the report date, and restart depended on regulatory approvals.

Financial performance and liquidity

MetricFY 2021FY 2020
Oil and gas sales$335.8 million$200.9 million
Total revenues$342.9 million$202.1 million
Net loss$32.1 million$464.0 million
Adjusted EBITDA (non-GAAP)$84.7 million$85.2 million
Cash from operating activities$63.0 million$74.3 million
Capital expenditures$29.8 million cash additions to oil and gas and other property$35.9 million
  • Net loss per share was $0.84. FY 2021 results included a $142.4 million loss on commodity derivatives, versus a $60.7 million gain in 2020; the 2021 amount included $88.3 million of cash settlements paid on expired positions.
  • Average production fell 14%, to 24.0 MBoe/d from 27.8 MBoe/d. Average realized price excluding derivatives rose to $38.39/Boe from $19.71/Boe. Oil and gas sales increased 67%, primarily reflecting higher commodity prices despite lower volumes.
  • Average lease operating expense increased to $13.88/Boe from $11.75/Boe; gathering, processing and transportation was $2.38/Boe versus $2.02/Boe. The filing does not provide a single consolidated profit-margin percentage.
  • Year-end cash was $18.8 million, working capital deficit was $39.4 million, and Revolving Credit Facility debt was $230.0 million. The $245.0 million borrowing base left approximately $15.0 million of availability at year-end; it was scheduled to decline by $5.0 million monthly beginning February 2022 pending the expected April redetermination.
  • FY 2021 operating cash flow was below 2020, in part reflecting derivative cash payments. The company repaid $25.0 million net under its revolver during 2021 and had no letters of credit outstanding at year-end. It reported compliance with credit facility covenants at December 31, 2021.
  • Asset retirement obligations were $103.4 million. The company also had substantial future funding commitments for Beta decommissioning, including $6.7 million in 2022 under its supplemental bonding trust arrangements.

Material changes and unusual items

  • The 2021 net loss improved substantially from 2020, when the company recorded $476.9 million of impairment expense. No impairment expense was recorded in 2021.
  • Proved reserves increased to 121.2 MMBoe from 113.8 MMBoe. Higher pricing contributed materially to the increase, while revised development plans removed 16.0 MMBoe of PUD locations; year-end PUDs were 2.2 MMBoe.
  • Winter Storm Uri caused approximately two weeks of shut-ins in February 2021. Natural decline and the Beta shutdown also reduced production.
  • The $5.5 million PPP loan was forgiven in 2021 and recorded as a gain on extinguishment of debt. The company also recognized $2.8 million of employee retention credits.
  • The 2021 dividend remained suspended; the company said it did not intend to pay cash dividends currently.

Outlook, risks, and contingencies

  • Management expected 2022 capital expenditures of approximately $20 million to $30 million, funded from operating cash flow, revolver borrowings and, potentially, debt or equity financing. The company said it would adjust spending as conditions change.
  • The company estimated Beta incident response, remediation and certain legal costs at $90 million to $110 million. That estimate excludes lost Beta revenue, pipeline repair and restart costs, and costs or claims not then reasonably estimable; management cautioned total costs could increase.
  • At December 31, 2021, Amplify reported $99.0 million in gross incident costs and $97.4 million in insurance recoveries received or considered probable, with a $1.6 million net charge. It had collected $48.3 million of those recoveries by year-end and reported further insurance receipts of $22.1 million through March 1, 2022. Separately, it recognized and subsequently received a $6.7 million loss-of-production-income insurance settlement.
  • Beta’s pipeline could not restart until required approvals, including PHMSA approval of a written restart plan. The filing gave no assurance whether or when operations would resume. The incident also prompted federal and state investigations, a federal misdemeanor Clean Water Act indictment, and consolidated class-action litigation; potential liability could not be estimated clearly.
  • Commodity-price volatility, reserve-based borrowing base reductions, covenant compliance, hedging outcomes, customer concentration, environmental regulation, decommissioning collateral needs, and access to financing are material risks. Three customers represented at least 10% of revenue each in 2021.
  • Deloitte issued an unqualified opinion on the financial statements and internal controls; management also concluded disclosure controls and internal control over financial reporting were effective at year-end.

Most important facts for investors to verify

  • Beta pipeline repair and restart approvals, expected timing, production impact, and any change in the company’s 2022 outlook.
  • Final incident costs, uninsured exposures, litigation and enforcement outcomes, and the amount and timing of insurance collections. The filing’s narrative cites an approximately $49.1 million year-end insurance receivable, while the balance sheet note reports $55.8 million; reconcile this difference with the underlying statements and subsequent collections.
  • Actual revolver borrowing base after the scheduled monthly reductions and subsequent redetermination, available liquidity, and ongoing covenant compliance.
  • Hedge settlements and coverage relative to actual production, especially while Beta is shut in, and the resulting effect on cash flow.
  • Whether planned capital spending, production, reserves, and decommissioning trust funding remain achievable under current operating and financing conditions.