BWX Technologies, Inc. quarterly report, Q3 FY2012

BWX Technologies, Inc. (then The Babcock & Wilcox Company) — Q3 2012 Form 10-Q Summary

Business context and reporting period

The filing covers the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2012, with comparative periods ended September 30, 2011. The company operated through Power Generation, Nuclear Operations, Technical Services, and Nuclear Energy segments, serving commercial power, U.S. government, defense, nuclear, and industrial markets. The filing was signed November 7, 2012.

Key financial metrics

MetricQ3 2012Q3 20119M 20129M 2011
Revenue$807.6 million$707.6 million$2,426.1 million$2,151.3 million
Operating income$67.3 million$57.6 million$222.4 million$142.7 million
Operating margin8.3%8.1%9.2%6.6%
Net income attributable to the company$40.5 million$45.7 million$151.3 million$105.4 million
Diluted EPS$0.34$0.39$1.27$0.89
Net margin attributable to the company5.0%6.5%6.2%4.9%
Cash flow from operationsNot separately provided for the quarterNot separately provided for the quarter$(79.2) million$(45.7) million
  • Q3 revenue increased 14.1%; nine-month revenue increased 12.8%.
  • Q3 net income attributable to the company declined despite higher operating income, primarily because other-net expense included a $27.0 million impairment of the USEC investment.
  • Cash and cash equivalents were $200.3 million at September 30, 2012, down from $415.2 million at December 31, 2011. Including restricted cash and investments, total cash, restricted cash, and investments were approximately $408.2 million versus $551.1 million at year-end.
  • Debt was minimal: $2.7 million of current debt and $0.5 million of long-term debt. No borrowings were outstanding under the $700 million revolving credit facility; $198.3 million of letters of credit reduced availability to $501.7 million.
  • Total backlog was $5.44 billion, compared with $5.34 billion at December 31, 2011. Approximately $779 million was expected to convert to revenue during the remainder of 2012, $2.04 billion in 2013, and $2.63 billion thereafter.

Material changes versus the prior comparable period

  • Power Generation revenue rose 10.7% in Q3 and 18.4% for nine months, driven by environmental equipment and new-build steam generation projects. Segment operating income declined because of project cost overruns, competitive margins, lower joint-venture earnings, and a $2.6 million impairment.
  • Nuclear Operations revenue increased 11.8% in Q3 and 2.9% for nine months, while operating income increased to $51.9 million and $148.5 million, respectively, primarily from improved U.S. government nuclear-component activity.
  • Technical Services revenue declined 9.1% in Q3 and 9.5% for nine months, partly because Fukushima-related support work ended. Q3 operating income declined to $11.3 million, including the effect of lower estimated fees from the Y-12 joint venture following a security breach.
  • Nuclear Energy remained loss-making but improved: Q3 operating loss narrowed to $18.6 million from $37.5 million, and the nine-month loss narrowed to $48.4 million from $108.3 million. The improvement reflected the absence of $50.7 million of 2011 project cost overruns and recognition of an $18.1 million net benefit from the Columbia Generating Station contract settlement.
  • Changes in long-term contract estimates increased nine-month 2012 operating income by approximately $75.6 million, compared with approximately $4.0 million in the prior-year period. Contract estimates remain subject to future revisions.
  • The effective tax rate declined to 2.7% in Q3 and 27.1% for nine months, principally because the company recognized $25.3 million of previously unrecognized tax benefits after statutes of limitation expired.

Guidance, outlook, management commentary, risks, and unusual items

  • The filing does not provide clear numerical revenue, earnings, margin, or cash-flow guidance.
  • Management identified potential adverse effects from federal budget constraints and sequestration beginning in 2013, particularly for Nuclear Operations and Technical Services.
  • The Y-12 security breach temporarily halted operations and could reduce joint-venture fees, affect future DOE proposals, and materially affect results or cash flow.
  • Fixed-price and percentage-of-completion contracts create exposure to labor productivity, scheduling, material-cost, performance-guarantee, and liquidated-damages risks. Management stated that changes in estimated costs could materially affect results.
  • The company recognized a $27.0 million other-than-temporary impairment of its USEC preferred-stock investment, reducing its carrying value to an estimated $19.1 million. The company was exploring restructuring alternatives with USEC and continued to monitor the remaining investment.
  • Material contingencies included nuclear-related personal-injury and property-damage litigation involving Nuclear Fuel Services and former facilities in Apollo and Parks Township. Insurance and indemnities may be unavailable or insufficient, and adverse outcomes could materially affect financial results.
  • The company had not recognized amounts sought in the ANI insurance litigation because realization remained uncertain. A favorable judgment was under appeal as of the filing date.
  • The company notified employees that major U.S. and Canadian defined-benefit pension plans would freeze benefit accruals effective December 31, 2015, followed by service-based cash contributions to the thrift plan beginning January 1, 2016.
  • On November 5, 2012, the board declared a $0.08 per-share dividend and authorized up to $250 million of common-stock repurchases over two years.
  • Unfunded pension liabilities remained significant: the balance sheet reported a $541.7 million pension liability and $75.7 million of accumulated postretirement benefit obligations at September 30, 2012.

Most important facts for an investor to verify

  1. Whether improved contract performance and backlog conversion can offset cost overruns and competitive margin pressure, especially in Power Generation and Nuclear Energy.
  2. The sustainability of operating cash flow, given $79.2 million of cash used in operations during the first nine months and increased investment in contracts, inventory, and receivables.
  3. The recoverability of the remaining USEC investment and any additional restructuring or impairment exposure.
  4. The financial and contractual effects of federal sequestration, DOE procurement decisions, and the Y-12 security breach.
  5. The potential magnitude and insurance or indemnity coverage of nuclear-related litigation and environmental liabilities.
  6. The effects of substantial pension obligations and future funding requirements on liquidity.
  7. The extent to which the $5.44 billion backlog is funded, cancellable, or subject to revised estimates; backlog is not a GAAP measure and may not translate into future revenue or profit as expected.