GRAN TIERRA ENERGY INC. annual report, FY2012

Gran Tierra Energy Inc. — 2012 Form 10-K

Reporting period: Fiscal year ended December 31, 2012. This is an annual report, not a standalone fourth-quarter filing. Amounts are in U.S. dollars unless stated otherwise.

Business context

Gran Tierra is an independent oil and gas exploration, development and production company operating in Colombia, Argentina, Peru and Brazil. Colombia remained its principal operating and revenue base. The company reported 16,897 BOEPD of production, net after royalties and adjusted for inventory changes; 66% came from Colombia’s Chaza Block. Its strategy combines acquisitions with exploration and development drilling.

Key financial and operating metrics

Metric20122011Change or context
Oil and gas sales$583.1 million$596.2 millionDown 2%
Revenue and other income$585.2 million$597.4 millionDown 2%
Net income$99.7 million$126.9 millionDown 21%; diluted EPS was $0.35 versus $0.45
Funds flow from operations$323.8 million$319.0 millionUp 1%; non-GAAP measure
Net cash from operating activities$156.3 million$353.8 millionLower, in part due to a $167.4 million adverse change in operating assets and liabilities
Capital expenditures$313.2 million$327.6 millionIncludes changes in non-cash working capital; separate Brazil acquisition cash payment was $35.5 million
Cash and cash equivalents$212.6 million$351.7 millionDown $139.1 million
Working capital, including cash$222.5 million$213.1 millionUp $9.4 million
Proved reserves, NAR40.6 MMBOE34.0 MMBOEUp 19%; 72% developed

Average realized oil price was $97.31 per barrel, versus $96.60 in 2011. Production declined 3% to 16,897 BOEPD, primarily reflecting Colombian pipeline delivery restrictions and increased oil inventory. Operating expenses rose to $124.9 million, or $20.20 per BOE, from $86.5 million, or $13.61 per BOE. Net income margin was approximately 17% of revenue and other income.

Fourth-quarter detail: Revenue and other income were $145.2 million and net income was $42.3 million, or $0.15 per basic and diluted share. The comparable 2011 quarter reported $161.7 million revenue and $32.6 million net income.

Material changes and unusual items

  • Colombian production and deliveries were disrupted by sabotage-related closures of the Ecopetrol-operated OTA pipeline for more than 162 days in 2012. The filing estimates the disruption reduced production by approximately 4,000 BOPD NAR during the year.
  • A February 2012 change in the Ecopetrol sales point shifted transportation charges into operating expenses and increased reported oil inventory. The company also incurred more costly trucking to alternative sales points.
  • Foreign exchange loss was $31.3 million, including $17.1 million unrealized. A $9.3 million Colombian VAT recovery was recorded as an unusual gain.
  • 2012 DD&A included a $20.2 million Brazil ceiling-test impairment related to Block BM-CAL-10. By comparison, 2011 included impairments of $42.0 million in Peru and $25.7 million in Argentina, as well as a $21.7 million gain on the Petrolifera acquisition.
  • A $10.9 million revenue reduction followed an arbitration decision on a third-party Chaza Block net-profits interest. It also increases future amounts payable to that party.
  • Gran Tierra acquired the remaining 30% interest in four Brazilian blocks for $35.5 million cash, with up to $3.0 million of contingent consideration. It also received commerciality approval for Brazil’s Tiê field and expanded its interests and operatorship in Peru, subject to approvals.

Liquidity, outlook and principal risks

Gran Tierra reported no debt outstanding at year-end and had not drawn on its revolving reserve-based credit facility. Its committed borrowing base was $50 million at December 31, 2012 and increased to $100 million effective February 15, 2013; borrowings bear interest at LIBOR plus 3.5%. Management expected cash, operating cash flow and potential facility draws to fund its 2013 program, while noting that lower prices or further delivery restrictions could require spending reductions, asset sales or new financing.

The planned 2013 capital program was approximately $363 million: Colombia $224 million, Brazil $67 million, Peru $38 million, Argentina $31 million and corporate $3 million. Planned spending included $202 million for drilling, $65 million for facilities, pipelines and other, and $93 million for geological and geophysical work. This is a plan, not a guarantee of expenditure or results.

  • Concentration and transport: 84% of 2012 revenue and other income came from Colombia; Ecopetrol accounted for 74% of consolidated revenue. Pipeline sabotage, limited transport capacity, storage constraints and higher-cost trucking may constrain sales or production.
  • Political, regulatory and currency exposure: Risks include Argentine price controls and investment-plan review, potential royalty and concession-cost increases, currency restrictions, and regulatory and permitting uncertainty across operating countries. Most company cash was held by foreign subsidiaries; 89% was outside the United States, and transfers may be restricted or taxed.
  • Contingencies: The ANH disputed royalty interpretations relating to Moqueta and transportation-cost deductions. Potential compensation was estimated at $15.1 million and $11.6 million, respectively, if the agency prevails; neither amount was accrued because the company did not consider a loss probable. Ecopetrol also claimed approximately $5.9 million in a separate Guayuyaco contract dispute.
  • Exploration and execution: Reserve estimates, drilling outcomes, permits, work commitments, environmental obligations and community relations carry material uncertainty. Management warned that lower oil prices, higher costs or unsuccessful drilling could impair assets and reduce liquidity.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether Colombian pipeline access and alternative transportation arrangements remain reliable, and how they affect realized sales, production and unit costs.
  • Whether the 2013 capital program can be funded from operating cash flow, cash balances and the credit facility without material reductions or additional financing.
  • Progress on the ANH royalty disputes and Ecopetrol litigation, including any change in the probability or estimated amount of potential losses.
  • Whether reserve growth converts into production and cash flow, especially in Colombia, Brazil and Peru; verify independent reserve assumptions and development timing.
  • Changes in Argentina’s regulatory and concession terms, cash-transfer restrictions, and the company’s ability to collect and repatriate funds.
  • Quarterly operating cash flow versus non-GAAP funds flow, working-capital movements, and the effects of foreign exchange and unusual tax recoveries.