Howmet Aerospace Inc. quarterly report, Q2 FY2018

Business context and reporting period

Entity note: The supplied filing is Arconic Inc.’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2018, not a filing under the name Howmet Aerospace Inc. Arconic was a global manufacturer of engineered aluminum, titanium, and nickel products serving aerospace, transportation, construction, and industrial markets. Figures are in millions of dollars except per-share amounts.

Financial performance and liquidity

MetricQ2 2018Q2 2017Six months 2018Six months 2017
Sales$3,573$3,261$7,018$6,453
Operating income$324$320$657$603
Net income$120$212$263$534
Diluted EPS$0.24$0.43$0.53$1.07

Q2 gross profit was $670 (18.8% of sales), versus $712 (21.8%) a year earlier; operating margin was 9.1% versus 9.8%, and net margin was 3.4% versus 6.5%. For the first half, operating margin was 9.4% versus 9.3%, while net margin was 3.7% versus 8.3%. Sales increased 10% in Q2 and 9% year to date, but earnings were lower.

  • Cash flow: First-half cash used for operations was $260, compared with $316 used in 2017. Investing provided $146, including $420 in receipts from sold receivables; financing used $577. Capital expenditures were $288, implying approximate free cash flow of negative $548 (operating cash flow less capital expenditures).
  • Balance sheet and liquidity: Cash was $1,455 at June 30, down from $2,150 at year-end 2017. Current assets were $6,075 and current liabilities $2,977 (current ratio approximately 2.0). Debt was $6,357, comprising $6,312 long-term debt and $45 short-term debt; cash less total debt was approximately negative $4,902. The $3.0 billion revolving credit facility was undrawn, and the company reported compliance with its covenants.
  • Other: Shareholders’ equity was $5,204; dividends were $0.06 per share in Q2. Pension contributions were $237 in the first half.

Material changes versus prior comparable period

  • Revenue growth reflected higher volumes across segments, higher aluminum prices, and favorable currency movements. Higher input costs and aluminum prices, unfavorable mix, customer-claim settlements of $38, and a $23 inventory adjustment weighed on costs and profitability.
  • Q2 net income fell 43%; first-half net income fell 51%. Comparisons were affected by 2017 gains that did not recur: a $167 debt-for-equity exchange gain in Q2 2017 and, for the first half, a $351 gain from selling Alcoa Corporation shares as well as the $167 exchange gain.
  • Segment operating profit declined year to date in Engineered Products and Solutions ($433 versus $497) and Global Rolled Products ($235 versus $269); Transportation and Construction Solutions improved ($164 versus $139). Rings and disks operating shortfalls particularly affected Engineered Products and Solutions.
  • Interest expense declined to $89 from $183 in Q2, partly because 2017 included debt-redemption costs and debt outstanding was lower. First-half restructuring charges declined to $22 from $99, including the prior-year $60 loss on the Fusina mill sale.

Outlook, risks, contingencies, and unusual items

  • Management expected continued strength in commercial aerospace, defense, automotive, commercial transportation, and building and construction markets, alongside cost savings. It also expected continuing industrial gas-turbine weakness, pricing pressure and operating challenges in rings and disks, unfavorable effects from higher aluminum prices in rolled products, and continued packaging-operation ramp-down. No consolidated numerical earnings guidance is provided in the supplied text.
  • The company identified uncertainty around U.S. sanctions affecting Rusal, a supplier of primary aluminum. It did not anticipate interruption at its Samara plant and expected U.S. and European facilities could source metal elsewhere if needed; aluminum prices could remain volatile.
  • Q2 included a $21 tax charge related primarily to updated provisional estimates under the 2017 U.S. tax law. A Spanish tax assessment was under appeal; a potential tax charge of up to approximately $59 was identified for Q3, with Alcoa Corporation responsible for 49% of the net liability under the tax agreement. A separate foreign tax matter could produce recognition of a tax benefit of up to approximately $38 in Q3.
  • Grenfell Tower-related securities litigation and a derivative action remained unresolved; the company said it could not reasonably estimate the likelihood or potential loss. Environmental remediation reserves were $287, including $211 for the Massena West, New York, project. Other guarantees include a long-term energy-supply guarantee for an Alcoa Corporation facility with an estimated present value of approximately $1,156; management considered payment-default risk remote.
  • There was no impairment recorded for the disks operation or Arconic Engines goodwill after interim reviews, but the company warned that weaker forecasts or changed assumptions could lead to a material future non-cash impairment. In July 2018, after quarter-end, Arconic announced a sale process for its Building and Construction Systems business, which had 2017 sales of approximately $1,070.

Most important facts for investors to verify

  1. Confirm the issuer: this is an Arconic Inc. 2018 filing, despite the Howmet Aerospace metadata.
  2. Assess whether volume growth and cost savings can offset aluminum/input-cost inflation, customer claims, and rings-and-disks performance issues.
  3. Review cash conversion and working-capital needs: operating cash flow remained negative, and cash fell materially during the first half.
  4. Track debt, refinancing needs, and compliance with the revolving-credit leverage covenant as its limit tightens over time.
  5. Monitor the Spanish tax matter, Grenfell-related litigation, environmental remediation, and guarantees made on behalf of Alcoa Corporation.
  6. Evaluate execution of the announced Building and Construction Systems sale process and the outlook for the affected segment.