Mastech Digital, Inc. quarterly report, Q1 FY2017

Mastech Digital, Inc. — Q1 2017 Form 10-Q

Business and period: Provider of IT staffing and digital transformation services, reporting for the three months ended March 31, 2017, compared with Q1 2016. All figures below are in U.S. dollars; financial statement amounts are in millions unless noted.

Financial performance

MetricQ1 2017Q1 2016Change
Revenue$33.1$31.7+4.4%
Gross profit / margin$6.2 / 18.8%$6.1 / 19.3%Profit up; margin down 0.5 percentage points
Operating income$0.403$0.135Improved
Net income$0.201$0.011Improved
Diluted EPS$0.04$0.00Improved
Operating cash flow$(3.254)$(2.873)Greater cash use
  • Revenue growth reflected more billable consultants (893 versus 854) and a slightly higher average bill rate ($75.40 versus $74.80). Wholesale revenue rose about 9% to $20.8 million; retail revenue fell about 3% to $12.3 million. Placement fees were under $0.1 million in both periods.
  • Gross margin pressure reflected higher self-insured benefit costs and weaker retail margins. Retail gross margin fell to 21.4% from 22.5%; wholesale margin was 16.9% in both periods.
  • SG&A was $5.806 million, down from $5.978 million. Q1 2016 included $0.780 million of executive-severance costs; 2017 had none. Sales and recruiting expenses increased in 2017, including from staff expansion and higher India recruiting-center compensation.
  • Cash from operations was negative, largely due to a $3.9 million working-capital increase, including higher receivables and lower accrued payroll. Investing used $0.043 million; financing provided $3.344 million, mainly net revolving-credit borrowings.

Financial position and liquidity

  • At March 31, 2017, cash was $0.876 million, accounts receivable $18.704 million, unbilled receivables $4.673 million, and total assets $41.575 million. Accounts-receivable days sales outstanding remained 58 days.
  • Balance-sheet debt was $13.280 million ($1.800 million current and $11.480 million long term); management reported $12.4 million of bank debt net of cash. Revolver borrowings were $7.4 million, with $9.6 million of unused capacity; term-loan borrowings were $5.9 million. The company said it was compliant with facility provisions.
  • Management believes cash, operating cash flow and available credit should fund business needs and debt service for the next 12 months, excluding potential acquisitions.

Outlook, risks and other notable items

  • No quantified revenue or earnings guidance was provided. Management described activity levels as solid in Q1 2017, while recruitment challenges from a tight supply of skilled IT professionals continued.
  • Management noted sensitivity to U.S. economic conditions and key-client prospects. The top ten clients generated 47% of Q1 2017 revenue, versus 42% in Q1 2016; CGI alone accounted for 13%. Wholesale mix can weigh on margins, and MSP cost pressures may further pressure retail margins.
  • The company had no currency-hedging program in 2017 and cited foreign-exchange exposure from its Indian recruitment operations. A $5 million-notional interest-rate swap hedged part of its variable-rate term debt.
  • Operating lease commitments were approximately $3.2 million. Management expected adoption of the new lease accounting standard to materially affect financial condition and results of operations.
  • Ordinary-course lawsuits and administrative proceedings were not expected by management to have a material adverse effect. No material changes to previously reported risk factors were disclosed. Disclosure controls were assessed as effective.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether revenue and consultant growth continue, particularly in wholesale, and whether client concentration increases.
  • Whether gross-margin pressure from benefit costs, retail/MSP mix and staffing constraints persists.
  • Whether receivables and payroll timing normalize and operating cash flow improves without increased revolver borrowing.
  • Available borrowing capacity, debt amortization and covenant compliance under the credit facility.
  • The expected financial-statement impact and timing of lease-standard adoption, and any developments in legal or tax contingencies.