ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. quarterly report, Q2 FY2015

Business context and reporting period

Ormat Technologies, Inc. designs, builds, owns and operates geothermal and recovered-energy power plants, and sells related equipment and services. This unaudited Form 10-Q covers the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2015; comparisons are with the corresponding 2014 periods. Dollar amounts below are in millions unless stated otherwise.

The business has Electricity and Product segments. Electricity generated 69.4% of first-half revenue; Product generated 30.6%. In February, the company completed its share exchange with former parent Ormat Industries, increasing public float from about 40% to about 76%. In April, it sold Northleaf a 36.75% interest in a subsidiary holding selected power assets, while retaining control.

Financial performance and position

MetricQ2 2015Q2 2014Six months 2015Six months 2014
Revenue$140.5$127.6$260.7$270.0
Gross margin$50.8; 36.1%$40.0; 31.3%$94.8; 36.4%$93.4; 34.6%
Operating income$38.6$22.3$68.5$64.9
Net income attributable to Ormat stockholders$14.4$9.1$24.4$30.7
Diluted EPS$0.28$0.20$0.49$0.67
Operating cash flowNot stated separatelyNot stated separately$112.7$103.6
  • Revenue mix: Q2 Electricity revenue was $90.9, down 0.8%; Product revenue was $49.6, up 38.0%. First-half Electricity revenue fell 3.0% to $180.9, and Product revenue fell 4.4% to $79.8.
  • Margins and costs: Q2 operating margin was 27.5%, versus 17.5% a year earlier. First-half operating margin was 26.3%, versus 24.0%. Lower electricity costs and stronger Product revenue/margins supported improvement; 2014 included an $8.1 exploration write-off.
  • Cash flow and investment: First-half capital expenditures were $86.1; operating cash flow less capital expenditures was approximately $26.6. Investing cash outflow was $79.4. Cash and cash equivalents rose to $137.7 from $40.2 at year-end; this excludes $104.9 of restricted cash.
  • Debt and liquidity: Balance-sheet current and long-term debt totaled approximately $920.9, including project and corporate debt; the filing distinguishes limited/non-recourse debt from full-recourse obligations. Cash and cash equivalents were $137.7. Management reported $160.5 of unused corporate borrowing capacity; committed corporate facilities totaled $538.9, of which $378.4 was utilized, largely through letters of credit.
  • Other metrics: Power generation increased 12.4% in Q2 and 5.7% in the first half. Adjusted EBITDA was $67.8 for Q2 versus $61.8, and $133.2 for the first half versus $135.3. Quarterly dividend declared was $0.06 per share; a further $0.06 dividend was declared in August.

Material changes versus prior comparable periods

  • Q2 revenue rose 10.1%, mainly from Product segment timing and new contracts; first-half revenue declined 3.5% in both segments.
  • Q2 attributable net income improved, while first-half attributable net income fell 20.3%. The first-half comparison was affected by the $7.6 gain on the 2014 Heber Solar sale, which did not recur.
  • First-half interest expense declined to $36.7 from $42.6, partly due to debt repayments. The June repurchase of $30.6 principal of OFC secured notes reduced future interest expense by an estimated $2.5 but generated a $1.7 loss.
  • Northleaf contributed $156.8 net proceeds and created a substantial noncontrolling interest; the transaction generated an approximately $102.1 U.S. taxable gain, which the company expects to offset with NOLs and tax credits.
  • Share exchange-related costs contributed to higher first-half general and administrative expense. First-half cash flow benefited from timing of customer billings, while receivables increased.

Outlook, commentary and risks

  • No full-year revenue or earnings guidance is provided. Management estimated approximately $79.0 of capital expenditures and $36.5 of debt repayments for the remainder of 2015, and expects to use available liquidity, operating cash flow and project financing/refinancing.
  • Projects under development include Don A. Campbell Phase 2, expected to start commercial operation toward year-end 2015; Olkaria III Plant Four, expected in the second half of 2016; and Sarulla, whose first phase is expected in 2016, although the filing warns of possible schedule delay. A $98.8 Chile EPC contract was announced; completion is scheduled by mid-2017.
  • Management’s multi-year strategy targets geographic and customer-base expansion and diversification into higher-temperature geothermal, solar, hybrid renewable energy and storage. Management cautions that timing and results are uncertain.
  • Key exposures include geothermal resource and operating performance, project delays, competition, changing oil and gas prices under variable-rate PPAs, foreign exchange, political and regulatory conditions, environmental requirements, and customer concentration. About 77.7% of first-half Electricity revenue came from fixed-energy-rate PPAs. Four utilities accounted for significant revenue, including NV Energy subsidiaries and Kenya Power.
  • As of June 30, the company reported compliance with stated debt covenants. The OFC secured-note debt-service coverage ratio was close to its 1.25 distribution threshold: actual 1.26 and pro forma 1.29. Other disclosed covenant ratios were above their stated minimums or below their maximums.
  • Legal matters include a Hawaii night-drilling suit, an appeal concerning union recognition at Puna, and a qui tam case alleging improper grant applications; the company disputes the allegations. A Clean Air Act case was dismissed in June. Management says other proceedings are not expected to be material.
  • Subsequent events: a $42.0, 12-year limited-recourse Amatitlan refinancing closed July 31; the board declared a $0.06-per-share dividend on August 3. The interim results are not necessarily indicative of full-year results.

Most important facts for investors to verify

  1. Whether first-half revenue weakness in both segments persists, and how Product backlog, order timing and margins develop.
  2. Project schedules, capital requirements and returns for Don A. Campbell Phase 2, Olkaria III Plant Four and Sarulla, including Sarulla’s stated delay risk.
  3. Available unrestricted liquidity versus restricted/project-level cash, committed facilities and planned 2015 capital spending and debt repayments.
  4. Debt covenant headroom, particularly the OFC distribution coverage ratio, and the distinction between project-level non-recourse debt and corporate recourse obligations.
  5. Northleaf transaction economics, ongoing control and distributions, and the use and realizability of tax attributes against the taxable gain.
  6. Effects of oil and natural-gas prices, customer concentration, resource performance, and the disclosed litigation and regulatory risks.