ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. quarterly report, Q3 FY2014

Ormat Technologies, Inc. — Q3 2014 Form 10-Q

Business context and reporting period. Unaudited results cover the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, compared with the same 2013 periods. Ormat operates geothermal and recovered-energy power plants and sells power and generating equipment through its Electricity and Product segments. Unless noted, dollar amounts below are in millions.

Financial performance

MetricQ3 2014Q3 20139M 20149M 2013
Revenue$140.2$130.7$410.3$402.3
Gross profit / margin$55.5 / 39.6%$39.8 / 30.4%$148.9 / 36.3%$116.9 / 29.1%
Operating income / margin$43.8 / 31.2%$29.8 / 22.8%$108.7 / 26.5%$75.3 / 18.7%
Net income attributable to shareholders$16.5$13.0$47.2$33.1
Diluted EPS$0.36$0.28$1.03$0.72
Operating cash flowNot separately shownNot separately shown$178.8$32.2
  • For nine months, Electricity revenue increased 18.0% to $289.0 million, while Product revenue fell 22.9% to $121.3 million. Electricity represented 70.4% of revenue, up from 60.9%.
  • Q3 revenue rose 7.3%; operating income rose 46.9% and shareholder net income rose 27.5%. Nine-month operating income rose 44.3%; continuing-operations income increased 65.2% to $47.9 million. 2013 nine-month net income included $4.7 million from discontinued operations.
  • Management attributed stronger electricity results to new capacity, including Olkaria III Plant 3 and Don A. Campbell, and reported improved segment cost ratios. Product revenue varied with project timing and mix.
  • Nine-month operating cash flow increased substantially, helped by collections and working-capital movements, including $21.6 million from lower receivables and $37.4 million from increased billings in excess of costs. Investing cash outflow was $135.4 million, including $122.6 million in capital expenditures; financing cash outflow was $58.2 million.
  • Cash and cash equivalents were $42.5 million at September 30, versus $57.4 million at year-end 2013. Restricted cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities were $127.5 million, principally related to VIEs, and are not equivalent to unrestricted corporate cash.
  • Debt line items total approximately $1.04 billion, including current and long-term project-level and full-recourse debt. Reported unused corporate borrowing capacity was $229.1 million; committed letters of credit outstanding totaled $362.0 million. Management said it was in compliance with its financial covenants.
  • Adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP measure, was $69.2 million for Q3 and $199.6 million for nine months, compared with $60.3 million and $175.7 million, respectively.

Material changes, outlook and commentary

  • Electricity growth was partly offset by lower Product revenue. Nine-month electricity generation increased, primarily with new plants; the filing gives differing nine-month generation totals in separate sections (3,269,048 MWh and 3,281,785 MWh).
  • Reported results included a $7.6 million gain on the Heber Solar project sale, an $8.1 million Wister exploration write-off, and a roughly $1.1 million charge from prepaying the Amatitlan loan. The 2013 comparison included a $9.0 million Mammoth PPA termination fee and $4.7 million of discontinued-operations income.
  • Interest expense increased to $65.1 million for nine months from $51.8 million. Foreign-currency losses were $3.6 million versus gains of $3.8 million in 2013; tax-benefit income increased to $18.3 million from $14.3 million.
  • The company issued $140 million of secured project debt at a 4.61% coupon to fund McGinness Hills Phase 2 and repaid approximately $30 million of Amatitlan debt. It expects McGinness Hills Phase 2 to begin operating in Q1 2015. The Sarulla project reached financial close and construction began; Ormat has a $254 million equipment supply contract and a 12.75% equity stake.
  • No quantified full-year earnings or revenue guidance is provided. Management estimated approximately $55 million of capital expenditures and $31 million of debt repayment for the remainder of 2014, to be funded through available liquidity, operating cash flow and project financing.
  • Key risks include geothermal resource and operating performance, project timing and financing, dependence on long-term PPAs and concentrated utility customers, commodity-price exposure on variable-rate PPAs, foreign-currency and political risks, and competition. Puna’s area was affected by volcanic activity and lava flow; the plants and transmission lines were operating normally as of the filing, but future effects were uncertain.
  • Two lawsuits remain ongoing: a Clean Air Act and district-rules complaint concerning Mammoth plants, and a former-employee qui tam grant-related complaint. The company disputes the allegations and says it will defend itself; it reports no material accrual for these matters.
  • After quarter-end, the board declared a $0.05-per-share dividend. Ormat and parent Ormat Industries were considering a corporate reorganization that could make the parent a wholly owned subsidiary; approval and terms were uncertain. The filing also reported new Menengai project agreements and a $22.3 million Veyo EPC agreement after quarter-end.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Reconcile the inconsistent nine-month power-generation totals in the filing and assess the generation, operating performance and ramp-up of recently commissioned plants.
  • Review the composition and quality of operating cash flow, particularly the effects of customer collections and contract billings, and distinguish restricted project cash from corporate liquidity.
  • Confirm debt maturities, covenant headroom, project financing conditions and remaining capital needs against the stated 2014 spending and repayment estimates.
  • Track Product segment orders, backlog conversion and margins, as revenue is project-timing dependent; assess the Sarulla contract’s execution and Ormat’s minority-investment exposure.
  • Monitor Puna volcanic and transmission risks, major customer concentration, variable-PPA commodity exposure, and the status and potential consequences of the pending legal proceedings.
  • Determine whether the proposed parent-company reorganization proceeds, on what exchange terms, and with what governance or financial effects.