OLD REPUBLIC INTERNATIONAL CORP quarterly report, Q2 FY2012

Old Republic International Corporation — Q2 2012 Form 10-Q

Reporting period: Quarter and six months ended June 30, 2012; comparisons are with the corresponding 2011 periods unless noted. Dollar amounts are in millions except per-share data. The company operates General Insurance, Title Insurance, and the RFIG mortgage-guaranty and consumer-credit run-off businesses.

Financial performance

MetricQ2 2012Q2 2011Six months 2012Six months 2011
Operating revenues$1,201.9$1,097.9$2,357.0$2,221.0
Net premiums earned$981.4$890.5$1,925.0$1,813.3
Net investment income$85.0$93.1$170.9$184.6
Net realized investment gains (losses)$22.0$(2.9)$24.9$3.5
GAAP net loss$(34.0)$(66.3)$(33.5)$(79.2)
GAAP diluted loss per share$(0.13)$(0.26)$(0.13)$(0.31)
Operating net loss, excluding realized gains/losses$(48.3)$(64.3)$(49.7)$(81.5)

Revenue growth reflected higher General and Title premiums and fees, partly offset by lower RFIG run-off revenue and investment income. Improved reported net results included higher realized gains and tax credits; the RFIG run-off segment continued to generate substantial operating losses.

Segments, underwriting and material changes

  • General Insurance: Q2 revenue was $657.8 and pretax operating income was $59.6, versus $604.0 and $82.0. For the first half, pretax operating income fell to $140.1 from $170.9. Excluding the reclassified CCI run-off book, the composite underwriting ratio rose to 99.8% in Q2 from 95.6%, and to 97.8% for the half from 94.8%. Management cited increased claim costs in commercial auto, general liability and workers’ compensation, plus new accounting-standard acquisition-cost charges of about $11 for Q2 and $22 year to date.
  • Title Insurance: Q2 premiums and fees rose 23.3% to $403.4; pretax operating income increased to $22.5 from $5.5. The six-month composite ratio improved to 97.1% from 100.5%. Management cited market-share gains, refinancing activity, lower claim ratios and expense rationalization.
  • RFIG run-off: Q2 pretax operating loss narrowed to $160.2 from $186.9; the six-month loss narrowed to $251.5 from $308.4. However, CCI claim costs increased markedly, reflecting higher estimated litigation costs and lower expected salvage recoveries. Mortgage-guaranty premiums and investment income declined as the book ran off.
  • The company combined CCI and mortgage-guaranty activities in the RFIG run-off segment for reporting; prior-period segment data was reclassified. Both businesses are closed to new production. Mortgage-guaranty new insurance written was only $2.0 in the first half of 2012.

Cash flow, balance sheet, debt and liquidity

  • First-half operating cash flow was positive $130.3, compared with a $153.4 outflow in 2011. Investing activities provided $315.8; financing activities used $430.0, including $338.9 of debt redemptions and $90.6 of common dividends. Cash ended at $109.2.
  • At June 30, total assets were $15,875.2, total liabilities $12,162.8, and shareholders’ equity $3,712.3. Book value was $14.50 per share, down from $14.76 at year-end 2011 and $15.56 at June 2011. Cash and invested assets totaled $10,464.2.
  • Debt fell to $573.8 from $912.8 at year-end 2011. The company redeemed $316.2 of 8% convertible notes in May and $20.0 of junior subordinated debt in June; $550.0 of 3.75% convertible notes due 2018 remained. Debt-to-equity was 15.5%.
  • Management said subsidiary dividends of up to $361.4 could be paid to the parent in 2012 without prior regulatory approval and considered liquidity adequate for expected parent-company needs. The filing says liquid resources were sufficient to redeem a substantial portion of the remaining convertible notes.

Outlook, risks and contingencies

  • No quantitative earnings or revenue guidance was provided. Management emphasized long-term performance across insurance cycles. It reported that its mortgage-guaranty model continued to indicate ultimate profitability, but expected 2012–2013 operating losses to exceed RMIC’s year-end 2011 statutory capital.
  • RMIC has been under North Carolina insurance-department supervision since January 2012. The order requires 50% cash payment on claims during an initial period of up to one year, with the unpaid portion retained as a deferred payment obligation. The accumulated obligation was $192.3 at June 30. Supervision is not itself a debt default, but a future receivership following statutory impairment could trigger acceleration of the 3.75% notes because RMIC is defined as a significant subsidiary. Management is considering possible responses, with no assurance they would succeed.
  • Mortgage-guaranty and CCI losses have depleted capital previously allocated to those coverages. Combined mortgage-insurance subsidiaries had approximately $195.9 of statutory capital, including the deferred payment obligation; the filing says future recapitalization would require separate external funding at an unknown date.
  • Material uncertainties include long-tail insurance reserve estimates, housing and mortgage-market conditions, claim rescissions and recoveries, and interest-rate effects on investment values and yields. Net investment income declined year over year amid historically low market yields.
  • Pending litigation includes title-insurance class actions, mortgage-insurance disputes and RESPA-related suits. The company said it did not believe the actions were probable to have a material adverse effect, but could not reasonably estimate potential liability; outcomes remain uncertain.
  • Other notable item: the company recorded no other-than-temporary investment impairments in the first half, compared with $8.0 in 2011. It reported no material change in risk factors from its 2011 Form 10-K and stated disclosure controls were effective.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • RMIC’s statutory capital position, supervisory-order status, claim-payment deferrals and any implications for the 2018 notes.
  • Developments in the planned external recapitalization of the run-off businesses and the sustainability of their reported loss trajectory.
  • General Insurance reserve development and loss trends, particularly in commercial auto, general liability and workers’ compensation.
  • Whether Title Insurance growth and underwriting improvement persist as refinancing activity and housing conditions change.
  • Cash generation, permitted subsidiary dividends, debt repayments and the effect of low investment yields on income and liquidity.
  • Progress and potential exposure from the disclosed litigation and mortgage-claim disputes; the filing provides no clear estimate of possible liability.