RING ENERGY, INC. annual report, Q3 FY2009

Business Context and Reporting Period

Company: Ring Energy, Inc. (Nevada Corporation)
Filing Type: Form 10-K (Annual Report)
Period Ended: September 30, 2009
Business Overview: Ring Energy is a development-stage entity that transitioned from mining to oil and gas exploration in March 2008. In May 2009, the company acquired a 25% working interest in the Anderson Project in Howard County, Texas. The company drilled its first well, Eastland #1, which was completed in late 2009. The well is currently producing marginally (1-4 barrels of oil equivalent per day) and has been deemed an impaired asset.

Key Financial Metrics

Metric 2009 2008
Revenue $0 $0
Net Loss $(334,055) $(124,464)
Operating Expenses $122,997 $123,760
Impairment Loss $(241,860) $0
Interest/Dividend Income $30,802 $1,137
Cash and Cash Equivalents $1,050,915 $87,296
Total Assets $1,087,277 $1,394,138
Total Liabilities $27,749 $941
Stockholders' Equity $1,059,528 $1,393,197

Liquidity: The company holds approximately $1.05 million in cash, representing 97% of total assets. Working capital is approximately $995,000. The company has no long-term debt obligations.

Material Changes vs. Prior Period

  • Asset Composition: Total assets decreased by 22% ($306,861) primarily due to the recognition of a $241,860 impairment charge on the Anderson Project oil and gas interest. In 2008, assets were heavily weighted toward available-for-sale securities ($1.25M), which were liquidated in 2009 to fund operations and exploration.
  • Profitability: Net loss increased significantly from $124,464 in 2008 to $334,055 in 2009. This deterioration was driven almost entirely by the impairment loss, which accounted for 72% of the net loss.
  • Operations: The company moved from a pre-exploration stage in 2008 to active drilling and completion in 2009. However, the initial well (Eastland #1) failed to meet commercial expectations in the primary target zone, resulting in the impairment.
  • Capital Structure: No new equity was issued in 2009. The company raised $1.5 million via a private placement in 2008, which funded the 2009 activities.

Outlook, Risks, and Management Commentary

  • Impairment and Future Costs: Management determined the Eastland #1 well is marginally commercial. An additional impairment of approximately $20,000 is expected for costs incurred in Q4 2009. The remaining carrying value of the asset is estimated at $25,780, which will be amortized based on production.
  • Liquidity and Capital Needs: Management believes current cash reserves (~$1M) are sufficient for ongoing operations (approx. $5,000/month) and further exploration of the current prospect. However, future capital raising via equity sales may be necessary for new acquisitions, which would result in dilution.
  • Going Concern: The financial statements include a note stating substantial doubt exists regarding the company's ability to continue as a going concern due to the lack of operating revenue and history of losses.
  • Risks: Key risks include the high probability of dry holes or non-commercial wells, reliance on a single part-time executive (CEO/President), limited trading volume for common stock, and exposure to volatile oil and gas commodity prices.
  • Guidance: The company has no formal guidance but is reviewing alternatives for further development within the existing prospect or seeking new opportunities.

Investor Verification Checklist

  • Impairment Validity: Verify the operator's estimate of the remaining recoverable value ($25,780) and the justification for the $241,860 impairment charge.
  • Production Data: Confirm the actual production rates (1-4 BOE/day) and the commercial viability of the Lower Spraberry formation completion.
  • Cash Burn Rate: Monitor the monthly operating expenses to ensure the $1M cash reserve lasts as projected without immediate need for dilutive financing.
  • Management Concentration: Assess the risks associated with relying on a single part-time executive (Mr. Steve Owens) for all operational and financial decisions.
  • Stock Liquidity: Review the OTCBB trading volume and bid-ask spreads, as the company notes trading is extremely limited and may not reflect intrinsic value.