Riley Exploration Permian, Inc. quarterly report, Q3 FY2012

Filing summary: Tengasco, Inc. — Form 10-Q

Identity note: The filing provided is for Tengasco, Inc., not Riley Exploration Permian, Inc. It covers the unaudited quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2012; comparative periods are 2011.

Business context and financial results

Tengasco explores for and produces oil and natural gas, primarily in Kansas and Tennessee. Subsidiaries operate a Tennessee gas pipeline and a landfill-methane project. Unless otherwise noted, amounts below are in millions of dollars.

MetricQ3 2012Q3 2011Nine months 2012Nine months 2011
Revenue$5.813$4.357$16.009$12.804
Operating income$2.132$1.649$5.545$4.415
Net income$1.219$1.186$3.179$2.517
Diluted EPS$0.02$0.02$0.05$0.04
Operating margin36.7%37.8%34.6%34.5%
Net margin21.0%27.2%19.9%19.7%

At September 30, 2012, cash was $0.060 million, current assets $3.565 million, and current liabilities $2.127 million (current ratio about 1.68). Total debt was $11.620 million, including $11.388 million under the revolving facility; total liabilities were $15.706 million. Stockholders’ equity was $33.346 million.

Nine-month operating cash flow was $7.407 million, investing cash outflow $7.158 million, and financing cash outflow $0.257 million. Net additions to oil and gas properties were $7.700 million. Cash declined $0.008 million from year-end 2011.

Changes versus prior periods

  • Q3 revenue rose 33% year over year, while net income increased modestly from $1.186 million to $1.219 million. Nine-month revenue increased 25% and net income rose about 26%.
  • Management attributed revenue growth mainly to higher Kansas oil volumes: net sales were 170 MBbl for the first nine months versus 139 MBbl in 2011. Average Kansas oil price increased slightly, to $88.58 per barrel from $88.22.
  • Costs increased: nine-month production costs and taxes rose to $5.575 million, DD&A to $2.643 million, and G&A to $2.246 million. Higher production and depletion contributed to DD&A; G&A included a $0.238 million allowance for overdue Hoactzin-related receivables.
  • Derivative results were less favorable: the company reported a $0.140 million nine-month derivative loss in 2012 versus a $0.114 million gain in the income statement in 2011. The 2011 period also included settlement losses described in the filing.

Outlook, risks, and unusual items

  • No formal earnings or production guidance is provided. Management cautions that interim results are not necessarily indicative of full-year results.
  • The F&M Bank borrowing base was reduced from $23 million to $21.5 million in September 2012; $11.4 million was drawn. The facility rate was 5.25%, and the next borrowing-base review was expected in March 2013. The company was in covenant compliance at quarter-end, but warned that a future borrowing-base reduction could require repayment.
  • Commodity-price volatility, production and reserve estimates, drilling outcomes, and access to capital are key risks. A $65-per-barrel oil-price floor hedge covered 10,000 barrels monthly through December 2012; the methane-gas sales contract ran through July 2014.
  • The company received approximately $1.0 million under the federal Section 1603 program for its methane facilities. It stated that recapture was not anticipated, but the award is subject to specified conditions.
  • As designated operator for Hoactzin properties, Tengasco appealed a $386,000 BOEM civil penalty related to late contractor reporting. The company said it was not at fault, posted a collateralized appeal bond, and estimated possible payment from zero to $386,000.
  • Hoactzin had not paid overdue vendor balances; Tengasco recorded a $0.238 million allowance against the related-party receivable. The related management agreement was due to end no later than December 2012.
  • Management concluded disclosure controls were adequate and effective; no material change in internal control over financial reporting was reported. The filing lists no other legal proceedings.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Confirm the issuer: this source is Tengasco, Inc., not Riley Exploration Permian, Inc.
  • Review the status and outcome of the BOEM penalty appeal and whether any payment or additional cost was recorded.
  • Check the March 2013 borrowing-base review, covenant compliance, and any repayment requirements.
  • Assess collectability of Hoactzin receivables and the consequences of the management agreement’s expiration.
  • Verify production, commodity pricing, reserve assumptions, and the effect of the expiring oil hedge on future cash flow.