Sensata Technologies Holding Plc quarterly report, Q1 FY2012

Sensata Technologies Holding N.V. — Q1 2012 Form 10-Q

Reporting period: Three months ended March 31, 2012. The filing identifies the registrant as Sensata Technologies Holding N.V. (unaudited interim financial statements). Sensata makes sensors and control products for automotive, industrial, commercial, aerospace, and other markets.

Financial performance

MetricQ1 2012Q1 2011
Revenue$492.0 million$444.2 million
Gross profit / margin$166.8 million / 33.9%$167.0 million / 37.6%
Operating income / margin$78.2 million / 15.9%$78.9 million / 17.8%
Net income (loss) / diluted EPS$38.9 million / $0.21$(9.5) million / $(0.05)
Cash from operations$115.0 million$81.9 million
Capital expenditures$15.9 million$22.1 million

Revenue rose 10.8%. Sensors revenue increased 19.3% to $359.6 million, while Controls revenue declined 7.3% to $132.4 million. Segment operating income was $97.9 million for Sensors and $42.2 million for Controls, versus $96.2 million and $49.4 million, respectively, in the prior-year quarter.

Gross margin declined to 33.9%, primarily reflecting the dilutive effect of acquired businesses; higher cost of revenue also reflected volume and depreciation. Operating income was slightly lower despite revenue growth. SG&A fell to $38.6 million from $44.4 million, attributed mainly to cost-reduction initiatives, while R&D rose to $13.3 million from $8.8 million.

Cash, debt, and liquidity

  • Cash and cash equivalents were $193.1 million at March 31, 2012, up from $92.1 million at year-end 2011.
  • Gross outstanding indebtedness, including capital leases and other financing obligations, was $1.838 billion. Long-term debt net of discount and current portion was $1.776 billion; capital lease and other financing obligations totaled $46.1 million.
  • No revolving-credit borrowings were outstanding. Revolver availability was $244.1 million, net of $5.9 million in letters of credit.
  • Operating cash flow increased year over year, but included a $47.6 million cash benefit from increased accounts payable and accrued expenses; receivables absorbed $28.2 million.
  • Management expected 2012 capital expenditures of approximately $60–$80 million, funded from operating cash flow, and believed available liquidity would fund operations, capital expenditures, and debt service for at least the next 12 months. The company reported compliance with debt covenants at quarter-end.

Changes, outlook, and risks

  • Management attributed revenue growth to higher volumes, including growth from the HTS and MSP acquisitions and increased product content; pricing and foreign exchange were offsets. The filing attributes 10% volume growth to acquisitions and 7% to content, with declines in emerging and mature markets partly offsetting these factors.
  • Net income improved from a loss, but the comparison was heavily affected by currency translation: Q1 2011 included a $46.8 million currency loss on foreign-currency debt that was refinanced with U.S.-dollar debt. Q1 2012 reported a $4.2 million currency translation and other gain, primarily reflecting commodity-forward gains. The earnings improvement therefore should not be read solely as operating progress.
  • Q1 2012 interest expense, net, increased to $25.0 million from $22.9 million, mainly because the refinanced term loan carried a higher rate, partly offset by lower debt. The 2011 refinancing included $700 million of 6.5% Senior Notes due 2019 and a $1.1 billion term loan.
  • Restructuring continued under the 2011 and MSP plans. The 2011 plan was estimated to cost $20–$24 million in total and was expected to affect about 354 employees; actions were expected to finish in 2013. MSP actions were expected to affect 179 employees, with completion and payments through Q1 2013.
  • Key risks include automotive and other end-market demand, customer pricing pressure, competition, non-U.S. operations, and volatility or supply limitations for raw materials and components, including rare-earth materials used in MSP products. Commodity hedges may not be effective economically and their fair-value changes can add earnings volatility.
  • Contingencies include Ford speed-control-switch litigation (with a $0.3 million reserve and potential TI indemnification subject to contractual thresholds and caps), product claims, and an ongoing voluntary disclosure to the DOJ and SEC concerning a possible FCPA matter. The company said it could not estimate potential FCPA penalties and recorded no provision.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • How much of reported revenue growth reflects acquisitions versus comparable-business volume, and whether Controls demand stabilizes.
  • Whether gross and operating margins recover as acquired businesses are integrated and restructuring actions proceed.
  • The sustainability and quality of operating cash flow, particularly the contribution from payment timing and working-capital movements.
  • Debt-service capacity, floating-rate exposure, covenant headroom, and access to cash held in foreign subsidiaries.
  • Developments in the Ford litigation, other product claims, and the FCPA review, including any change in reserves, indemnification, or potential exposure.
  • Whether the stated $60–$80 million capital-spending plan and management’s liquidity assessment remain appropriate as demand and operating conditions change.