TREDEGAR CORP quarterly report, Q3 FY2016

Tredegar Corporation — Q3 2016 Form 10-Q

Reporting period: Quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2016. Tredegar manufactures polyethylene films (PE Films), polyester films (Flexible Packaging Films) and aluminum extrusions.

Financial performance

MetricQ3 2016Q3 2015Nine months 2016Nine months 2015
Sales$207.7 million$223.8 million$623.6 million$679.2 million
Net income (loss)$12.0 million($36.7 million)$22.7 million($26.3 million)
Diluted EPS$0.37($1.13)$0.69($0.81)
Operating cash flowNot presented by quarter$34.4 million$33.3 million
Capital expendituresNot presented by quarter$30.9 million$23.4 million
  • Consolidated gross margin was 16.3% in Q3 versus 15.0% a year earlier, and 16.5% for nine months versus 14.8%. SG&A and R&D together were 10.5% of sales in Q3 and 11.5% for nine months, compared with 8.3% and 9.7%, respectively.
  • Net sales by segment for Q3: PE Films $82.2 million, Flexible Packaging Films $27.3 million, and Aluminum Extrusions $91.1 million. Ongoing operating profit was $9.0 million, $0.1 million and $9.4 million, respectively.
  • For nine months, segment net sales were $251.5 million, $80.9 million and $270.0 million, respectively; ongoing operating profit was $23.6 million, $1.2 million and $27.8 million.
  • Cash and equivalents were $28.4 million at September 30, down from $44.2 million at year-end 2015. Long-term debt was $91.8 million, versus $104.0 million at year-end; debt net of cash was $63.4 million. Current assets were $217.0 million and current liabilities $124.9 million.
  • Operating cash flow was slightly higher year over year, while investing outflows increased, chiefly from higher capital spending. Financing used $23.5 million, including $10.8 million in dividends and net debt repayments/refinancing costs. Dividends were $0.33 per share for the first nine months.

Changes versus prior period

  • Reported earnings turned positive largely because Q3 and nine-month 2015 results included a $44.5 million non-deductible goodwill impairment charge for Flexible Packaging Films.
  • Sales fell 7.2% in Q3 and 8.2% for nine months. PE Films sales declined 12.5% and 14.0%, respectively, mainly from lost customer business and product-transition timing. Aluminum Extrusions sales declined 3.9% and 5.8%, largely reflecting lower aluminum prices. Flexible Packaging Films sales increased 0.5% and 4.6%.
  • Ongoing operating profit improved in Aluminum Extrusions, up 29.6% in Q3 and 33.2% for nine months, on operational efficiencies and lower freight, utility and other costs. Flexible Packaging Films profit declined sharply in Q3, partly because prior-year results included a $2.0 million U.S. trade-program refund and larger currency transaction gains.
  • Nine-month PE Films ongoing operating profit fell 34.3%, reflecting lost business, product-transition timing and weaker surface-protection demand, partly offset by productivity and lower costs.

Outlook, risks and unusual items

  • Management expects the PE Films Lake Zurich domestic-facility consolidation to finish around mid-2017. Estimated total cash expenditures are approximately $16–17 million; expected annual pre-tax cash savings are $5–6 million. Expenses incurred since launch were $5.7 million and cash expenditures $12.5 million through September 30, 2016.
  • PE Films expects 2016 R&D spending to exceed 2015 by about $4 million. It estimates a possible annual operating-profit impact of up to $5–10 million from surface-protection customer transitions, with timing uncertain, and about $10 million from a personal-care transition expected after 2018. Management cautions that offsets from growth, cost reductions or new products are not included in these estimates.
  • Management estimated 2016 capital expenditures of $27 million for PE Films, $5 million for Flexible Packaging Films and approximately $17 million for Aluminum Extrusions. It stated existing cash, borrowing availability and operating cash flow should cover working capital, capital expenditures and dividends for the next 12 months.
  • The March 2016 secured revolving facility provides $400 million and matures March 1, 2021. Approximately $237 million was available to borrow at September 30. The company reported covenant compliance, a 1.14x leverage ratio and 13.66x interest-coverage ratio; covenant limits are 4.00x maximum leverage and 2.50x minimum interest coverage.
  • A June 2016 explosion damaged Bonnell’s Newnan, Georgia casting facility and injured five employees, one seriously. Extrusion and finishing resumed the next day; casting operations were expected back by the end of Q2 2017. Replacement equipment and related costs are partly insured, while approximately $2 million of planned equipment and facility upgrades are not expected to be covered.
  • Tredegar recognized a $1.9 million insurance-recovery gain in Q3 related to the explosion; additional recoveries were expected. Q3 also included a $1.3 million unrealized loss on its private kaléo investment. That investment’s $18.4 million fair value uses Level 3 assumptions; a 500-basis-point change in discount rate was estimated to change value by about $4–5 million.
  • Flexible Packaging Films faces competitive pressure, global excess capacity and weak economic conditions in Brazil. The filing also identifies raw-material and energy costs, foreign exchange, customer concentration in PE Films, pension funding and possible asset impairments as risks.
  • A court decision remained pending in an appeal concerning whether certain Brazilian PET films fall within a U.S. antidumping-duty order. The filing says related liabilities are covered by acquisition-agreement indemnifications if duties are ultimately imposed.

Investor verification priorities

  • Track PE Films customer losses and product transitions, including whether new products and the facility consolidation offset the disclosed potential profit impacts.
  • Monitor completion costs, timing and insurance recoveries for the Lake Zurich consolidation and Newnan explosion.
  • Assess Flexible Packaging Films’ profitability amid Brazil’s economic conditions, competition, currency movements and raw-material pass-through timing.
  • Review kaléo’s Auvi-Q relaunch assumptions and the sensitivity of Tredegar’s reported investment value to valuation inputs.
  • Confirm liquidity, covenant headroom, pension contributions and the ability to fund planned capital spending and dividends.