TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC quarterly report, Q2 FY2014

Tyler Technologies, Inc. — Q2 2014 Form 10-Q

Business context and reporting period. Tyler provides software and services primarily to local governments, schools, and other public-sector entities. The filing covers the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014; financial statement amounts below are in millions unless otherwise noted. Its reportable segments are Enterprise Software Solutions (ESS) and Appraisal and Tax Software Solutions and Services (ATSS).

Financial performance

MetricQ2 2014Q2 2013Six months 2014Six months 2013
Revenue$124.4$103.1$237.0$198.9
Gross profit$58.6$47.0$111.1$90.9
Gross margin47.1%45.6%46.9%45.7%
Operating income$23.6$15.3$43.5$29.8
Net income$14.7$9.0$26.6$17.5
Diluted EPS$0.42$0.26$0.75$0.51
Operating cash flowNot separately reported by quarter in the cash flow statement$28.8$16.6
  • Q2 revenue increased 21% year over year; six-month revenue rose 19%. Q2 and six-month net income increased approximately 63% and 52%, respectively.
  • Q2 operating margin was 19.0%, up from 14.9%; the six-month margin was 18.3%, up from 15.0%.
  • Subscriptions were $20.9 million in Q2, up 51%; maintenance was $52.0 million, up 11%; software services were $30.1 million, up 25%; and software licenses and royalties were $12.1 million, up 20%.
  • At June 30, cash and cash equivalents were $88.1 million, with $0.8 million of short-term investments. Current assets were $261.0 million and current liabilities $215.8 million. The company had no borrowings outstanding; it had a $2.0 million letter of credit.
  • Six-month investing cash outflow was $6.1 million, primarily capital expenditures. Financing cash outflow was $13.5 million, including $22.8 million spent repurchasing approximately 294,000 shares.

Material changes and management commentary

  • Subscription growth reflected SaaS customer additions and conversions, as well as e-filing activity. The Texas e-FileTexas.gov contract contributed to the increase; management expected it to generate approximately $17 million in 2014 and $19 million in 2015.
  • Management attributed license growth to a more active market, stronger competitive position, larger contracts, and West Coast expansion. It noted that a higher mix of subscription arrangements can reduce initial-year license revenue compared with perpetual licenses.
  • Gross margin improved with revenue mix and lower initial investment costs for e-FileTexas.gov, partly offset by hiring to expand implementation and development capacity. Employee count rose to 2,735 from 2,431 a year earlier.
  • Appraisal services were affected by severe weather earlier in 2014; Q2 benefited from new New York revaluation contracts. Management expected appraisal-services revenue to grow over the prior year for the remainder of 2014, including an Indiana appraisal-cycle ramp-up.
  • Management plans continued significant investment in hiring and product development to support backlog and anticipated new business. It expected 2014 R&D expense to grow more slowly than revenue and capital spending, excluding acquisitions, of $12–$13 million.

Outlook, risks, and contingencies

  • No consolidated revenue or earnings guidance was provided. Management said available cash, operating cash flow, and credit-market access were expected to fund working capital, capital expenditures, taxes, and repurchases for at least 12 months.
  • The $150 million revolving credit facility was scheduled to mature August 11, 2014. Tyler was discussing a replacement facility and expected it to be smaller. It reported covenant compliance at June 30.
  • Key stated risks include public-sector budget or regulatory changes; data security and data-center continuity; reliance on Internet infrastructure; customer project delays and renewal trends; product-development and competition risks; acquisition integration; and retaining qualified personnel.
  • Other than routine litigation, the filing reported no material pending legal proceedings. A $2 million client letter of credit expires in 2015; management did not expect it to be drawn.
  • The company was assessing the impact and adoption method for the new revenue-recognition standard, effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016; it could not yet estimate the financial impact.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether the replacement credit facility was completed before the existing facility’s August 2014 maturity, and its size and terms.
  • Whether subscription, SaaS, and e-filing growth—particularly the Texas contract—translated into sustained revenue and margin performance.
  • Whether hiring and backlog delivery supported growth without materially diluting margins, and whether DSO (104 days at June 30, versus 87 at year-end) converted to cash after seasonal billings.
  • Actual 2014 capital spending and appraisal-services performance versus management’s stated expectations.
  • The eventual estimated impact and adoption approach for the new revenue-recognition standard.