UNION PACIFIC CORP quarterly report, Q3 FY2009

Union Pacific Corporation — Q3 2009 Form 10-Q

Business context and period. This unaudited filing covers the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2009, compared with the same 2008 periods. Union Pacific operates one reportable segment: its integrated railroad network.

Financial results and condition

MetricQ3 2009Q3 2008Nine months 2009Nine months 2008
Operating revenue$3.671 billion$4.846 billion$10.389 billion$13.684 billion
Operating income$967 million$1.215 billion$2.390 billion$2.934 billion
Net income$517 million$703 million$1.347 billion$1.677 billion
Diluted EPS$1.02$1.38$2.67$3.24
Operating ratio73.7%74.9%77.0%78.6%
  • Revenue fell 24% in both comparison periods. Freight revenue declined 25%; Q3 carloads fell 15% and average revenue per car fell 12%. All six commodity groups reported lower freight revenue.
  • Operating expenses fell 26% in both periods, led by lower fuel prices, lower volumes, workforce reductions and productivity gains. Fuel expense declined 59% in Q3 and 62% year to date; diesel averaged $1.87 per gallon in Q3 versus $3.70 in 2008.
  • Operating margin, calculated as operating income divided by revenue, was approximately 26.3% in Q3 versus 25.1% a year earlier, and 23.0% year to date versus 21.4%. The reported operating ratio also improved.
  • Interest expense rose to $156 million in Q3 and $447 million year to date, reflecting higher average debt. Effective interest rates were 6.3% in both 2009 comparison periods.
  • Nine-month cash from operations was $2.222 billion, down from $3.038 billion. Cash used in investing was $1.741 billion; capital investments were $1.831 billion. Free cash flow, as defined by the company, was $73 million versus $685 million.
  • Cash and equivalents were $1.435 billion at September 30. Total balance-sheet debt was $9.793 billion, up from $8.927 billion at year-end 2008. Debt to capital was 37.3% versus 36.6%; adjusted debt to capital was 46.9% versus 47.4%.
  • Current assets were $3.217 billion and current liabilities $2.748 billion. The company had $1.9 billion available under its revolving credit facility, no commercial paper outstanding, and was in compliance with its debt covenant.

Changes, outlook and management commentary

  • Management attributed weaker results chiefly to recession-driven demand declines and lower fuel surcharge revenue. Year-to-date freight revenue fell most sharply in automotive (47%) and industrial products (36%). Core pricing gains partly offset volume and fuel-recovery declines.
  • Cost reductions and improved network fluidity partly cushioned the downturn. Average train speed improved 16% in Q3; the workforce was down 11%, and approximately 1,800 road locomotives and 53,500 freight cars were stored at quarter-end.
  • Management reduced its 2009 capital expenditure projection in April to approximately $2.6 billion from $2.8 billion; spending could be adjusted with business conditions or regulatory developments. Approximately $200 million of planned 2010 capital spending was earmarked for positive train control. The filing provides no specific earnings or revenue guidance.
  • Other income for the first nine months included a $116 million pretax gain on a Colorado land sale. A 2009 restructuring of leases for 813 locomotives changed them from operating to capital leases, adding about $843 million of lease obligations; a further $100 million locomotive capital lease was entered into after quarter-end.
  • The receivables-sale facility was renewed in August with capacity reduced from $700 million to $600 million; $400 million was utilized at quarter-end. Investors may discontinue the facility in certain cases if the company’s credit rating falls below investment grade.

Risks, contingencies and unusual items

  • The company identified 318 sites where it may have environmental remediation liability. It reported a $200 million environmental liability at September 30, while noting that ultimate costs are uncertain.
  • For the Omaha Lead Site, the EPA has directed the Railroad to perform remediation estimated in an earlier order at $50 million; a 2009 EPA notice also sought work at approximately 9,000 yards as part of a final remedy. The Railroad disputes liability and is seeking a negotiated resolution.
  • A consent decree resolving government claims concerning restoration work in Nevada requires an $800,000 civil penalty, a $98,000 payment for weed eradication, and monitoring and maintenance of restored areas for five to seven years.
  • Recorded liabilities included $594 million for personal injury claims and $205 million for asbestos claims. The company also reported $423 million of contingent guarantees, with a $4 million recorded fair-value liability. It stated that known claims and guarantees were not expected to have a material adverse effect, while acknowledging estimation uncertainty.
  • The IRS has issued notices of deficiency for 1999–2006; the company disputes many proposed adjustments and is at IRS Appeals. The reported liability for unrecognized tax benefits was $50 million.
  • Management cited economic conditions, customer demand, fuel prices, legal and environmental matters, and other uncertainties as factors that could cause actual results to differ from forward-looking statements. No material changes to previously disclosed risk factors were reported.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether freight volumes and pricing recover, particularly in automotive, industrial products, international intermodal and energy.
  • How much operating improvement is sustainable if fuel prices rise or volumes remain weak; monitor operating ratio, service measures and cost reductions.
  • Capital spending, cash generation and leverage, including the effect of locomotive lease financing and planned positive train control investment.
  • The outcome and potential cost of the Omaha Lead Site proceedings, other environmental matters, and contested tax assessments.
  • Availability and terms of receivables financing and credit facilities, including refinancing needs and covenant compliance.