UNIVERSAL SAFETY PRODUCTS, INC. annual report, FY2022

Universal Security Instruments, Inc. — FY2022 Form 10-K Summary

Issuer and period: The filing is for Universal Security Instruments, Inc. (ticker UUU), rather than a company named Universal Safety Products, Inc. It reports the fiscal year ended March 31, 2022, with comparison to FY2021.

Business context

The company imports and markets smoke and carbon-monoxide alarms and other safety and electrical products. Most products are manufactured in China; principal supplier Eyston accounted for 83.6% of purchases in FY2022. Sales depend significantly on the U.S. housing market and retail demand.

Financial performance and liquidity

MetricFY2022 / March 31, 2022FY2021 / March 31, 2021
Net sales$19.55 million$17.52 million
Gross profit / margin$6.03 million / 30.9%$5.64 million / 32.2%
Operating income$69,690$133,784
Net income (loss)$(78,150)$268,343
Operating cash flow$(1.86) million$1.39 million
Cash at year-end$438,735$160,604
Working capital$4.45 million$5.56 million

Sales rose 11.6%. Gross margin fell to 30.9%, and the company moved from profit to loss; FY2021 results included $221,400 of PPP loan forgiveness. FY2022 net interest expense was $147,840. Cash from operations was more than offset by $2.14 million of net factor borrowings. Inventory increased to $6.23 million from $4.18 million, while accounts receivable and amounts due from the factor also increased.

Current liabilities were $6.55 million, including $2.16 million borrowed under the factoring facility and a $1.08 million supplier note. The factor facility is secured by receivables and inventory, bears interest at prime plus 2% (5.50% effective at year-end), and had only approximately $11,000 of unused availability. The supplier note requires $100,000 monthly payments beginning April 2022. The filing reports no income tax expense for either year and a full valuation allowance against deferred tax assets.

Changes, outlook, and key risks

  • Management attributed lower margins and the FY2022 loss chiefly to higher freight, demurrage, customs and duty costs, as well as merger-related legal and consulting fees. Certain imported products were subject to 25% tariffs.
  • COVID-related operating and port delays disrupted shipping and delivery. Backlog rose to approximately $6.03 million from $3.91 million, primarily because of delays at California ports. Management said it could not yet quantify the pandemic’s full financial impact.
  • Approximately $560,000 of receivables was subject to delivery disputes and withheld from factor financing. Management expected the dispute to be resolved and the amount to become available; it also expected a customs-duty refund of approximately $300,000 in FY2023. These are expectations, not assured receipts.
  • Management said cash flows and credit availability should fund operations for 12 months after the report’s issuance if its sales plan succeeds, but noted the company’s history of unprofitable operations, limited financing sources, and dependence on discretionary factor advances. It offered no formal quantified sales or earnings guidance.
  • Proposed merger: The February 2022 agreement with Infinite Reality contemplated former Infinite Reality shareholders owning approximately 97.6% of the post-merger company, leaving legacy USI holders approximately 2.4%. The agreement also contemplated possible sale or spin-off of USI’s current business, subject to approvals and other conditions. A shareholder lawsuit filed after year-end sought to enjoin the merger over alleged proxy-registration omissions; USI said it believed the suit was without merit.
  • Management concluded disclosure controls and internal control over financial reporting were ineffective at March 31, 2022, citing a material weakness involving financial-statement classification and disclosure. Management planned remediation. The auditor gave an unqualified opinion on the financial statements, but was not engaged to audit internal controls.

Important facts for investors to verify

  • Whether merger approvals, listing requirements, transaction terms, ownership dilution, and any disposition of the legacy business have changed or been completed.
  • Whether disputed receivables were collected and the expected customs refund was received.
  • Current borrowing availability, factor advances and terms, supplier-note repayment status, and the company’s ability to meet near-term cash requirements.
  • Whether shipping costs, tariffs, port delays, inventory levels, and gross margins have improved.
  • Whether the stated internal-control weakness was remediated and disclosure controls became effective.
  • Whether management’s 12-month liquidity expectations were achieved; they were conditional and not assured.